Get the Latest BuZZ Each Week

Transcript: Digital Production Buzz – December 31, 2015

Digital Production Buzz

December 31, 2015

[Transcripts provided by Take 1 Transcription]

(Click here to listen to this show.)

HOSTS
Larry Jordan
Mike Horton

SEGMENTS
Randi Altman’s Perspective
Tech Talk with Larry Jordan
BuZZ Flashback: Philip Hodgetts

GUESTS
Philip Hodgetts, President, Lumberjack System
Ned Soltz, Contributing Editor, Digital Video Magazine, Ned Soltz Inc.
Michael Kammes, Director, Technology, Key Code Media
Larry O’Connor, President & Founder, Other World Computing
Jonathan Handel, Entertainment/Technology Attorney & Labor Reporter, TroyGould and The Hollywood Reporter
===

Larry Jordan: A very happy New Year’s Eve and a wonderful New Year. Tonight on The Buzz, we take a look forward at key trends that we can expect appearing in 2016. We’ll cover hardware, software, workflow, labor and legal issues with our Buzz team, including Randi Altman, Philip Hodgetts, Ned Soltz, Larry O’Connor, Michael Kammes and Jonathan Handel. A happy New Year’s Eve and tonight we look forward to 2016. The Buzz starts now.

Announcer #1: Tonight’s Digital Production Buzz is brought to you by Other World Computing at macsales.com; and by Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Announcer #2: Since the dawn of digital filmmaking – authoritative – one show serves a worldwide network of media professionals – current – uniting industry experts: production, filmmakers, post production and content creators around the planet – distribution. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now.

Larry Jordan: Welcome to The Digital Production Buzz, the world’s longest running podcast for creative content creators and the industry covering media production, post production and marketing around the world. Tonight, we conclude our two special shows to end the year. Last week, we looked back at 2015; tonight, we look forward to 2016 with our best guess as to what some of the most significant trends in media might be. And just as we did last week, we’ll start with our own resident expert, the man who knows the future, the man who, well, suffice it to say it’s Mike Horton. Hello Mike and a very happy New Year’s to you.

Mike Horton: Happy New Year to you, Larry, and I’m trying to think about what’s going to happen in 2016. I haven’t a clue. It’s going to be tough. Let’s see, last year and the last couple of years there was 4K, so 2016 must be 8K.

Larry Jordan: Yes, probably.

Mike Horton: And we will probably have thinner, lighter, more affordable everything.

Larry Jordan: Boy, you’re really going out on a limb there.

Mike Horton: Yes I know. Another codec. There’s going to be another codec, Larry, I guarantee it, and it’ll be the best codec yet.

Larry Jordan: There’s no question.

Mike Horton: Yes, right, but everybody’ll still use ProRes.

Larry Jordan: How about video compression? And we still haven’t talked about changes to cable coiling which, I think, is going to be important for 2016.

Mike Horton: I think there are only a few tutorials out there right now, but I think it’s going to explode. It’s an industry unto itself and, believe me, if you get in on the ground floor of this thing, you don’t have to worry about money ever again.

Larry Jordan: No.

Mike Horton: Video coiling and video compression. There it is. That’s my stock tip of the week. Oh gosh. Do you have any prognostication on what’s going to happen in 2016?

Larry Jordan: Well, personally I think it’s going to be HDR. I think once people see HDR…

Mike Horton: Yes, of course, of course, of course.

Larry Jordan: …it’s going to be amazing, and I think the other thing – and we’ll hear more of this as we talk with the gang a little bit later; well, Philip Hodgetts has the best line of all where he says, “Whatever I predict is not going to happen” – but we’re going to see, I think, a slowdown in new products being released. We’re going to see more time spent with development, because the products are coming out so quickly nobody wants to buy and Ned Soltz has a really good discussion on how that’s going to impact camera manufacturers. So I think we’re going to see technological change continue, but not at the same pace as the last year. I think it’s going to slow down.

Mike Horton: So it’s going to be much more R&D? Are events like NAB and IBC and even CES, which is going to happen next week, there’s a slowdown in all sorts of stuff there?

Larry Jordan: I think the best word to use is refinement. It’s not that the products aren’t going to be there. We’re going to keep upgrading and refining, but we’re not going to keep releasing brand new things. I think we’re going to see a little bit of a slowdown there. We’ll see.

Mike Horton: I hope so.

Larry Jordan: I’m really curious to hear what the rest of our gang has to say and it’s going to be an interesting show.

Mike Horton: So do I and I’m looking forward to it.

Larry Jordan: Well, have yourself a great holiday, enjoy your celebration and I look forward to seeing you here back in your seat next week.

Mike Horton: Absolutely, and happy holidays to you and the best to you and everybody there for 2016.

Larry Jordan: And the same to you.

Mike Horton: We deserve it. We deserve it!

Larry Jordan: Take care, Michael, thank you. I want to remind you to subscribe to our free weekly show newsletter at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Every issue every week gives you an inside look at both The Buzz and the industry, plus quick links to all the different segments on the show. Best of all, every issue is free.

Larry Jordan: I’ll be back with Philip Hodgetts right after Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News.

Larry Jordan: This is Randi Altman’s Perspective.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman has been writing about our industry for more than 20 years. In fact, she’s the editor in chief of her own website at postperspective.com. And here, the day before the new year starts, it’s the perfect opportunity to say welcome back, Randi, it’s good to see you.

Randi Altman: Thanks for having me back. How was your Christmas, Larry?

Larry Jordan: It was a wonderful Christmas. I got to sleep late. How can you complain about that? Clearly there are no young children in our house. How about yourself?

Randi Altman: It was great, very good.

Larry Jordan: Excellent. Last week, we spent time talking about the trends that we saw in 2015. You mentioned virtual reality as one that you’ve been fascinated with for a long time; but now I want to turn our attention forward to 2016. What are you keeping an eye on now?

Randi Altman: Oh, absolutely more virtual reality trends, expecting more camera rigs, more ways to view it, but what interests me most is how they’re going to present VR content. I want to know is it going to be dramatically presented or is it going to focus more on scientific and maybe therapeutic uses? As long as they stay away from the gags that might get people a little cynical about it being the next stereo, I think that it’s going to continue its march along and be successful.

Larry Jordan: Well, if you think about it, the whole idea of interactive fiction, interactive narrative, has been with us for years and we’ve been struggling to find ways to actually make it take off. Games have probably been the most successful example of this, but an interactive feature film has been something that’s never quite made it. Perhaps VR gives us that opportunity to finally have interactive narrative fiction.

Randi Altman: I’m looking forward to seeing if that can be the case, yes.

Larry Jordan: What other things? We’ve got VR, what else is on your list for the coming year that we should pay attention to?

Randi Altman: Well, I think drones, in particular the GoPro Karma drone, which is coming out in 2016, so I’ll be eager to see that and also how the government is regulating who’s got drones and where they use them and that they don’t take down any airplanes, so it’s very important from a safety issue but also in terms of once we get into the production and using drones, how they’re used in the workflow.

Larry Jordan: That’s true. December 21st the FAA rolled out drone registration, where you need to identify the drone and the operator of the drone so they can track it down in case there’s a problem. I’m really curious to see if that starts to minimize some of the safety violations that we’ve seen with drones. So we’ve got VR, we’ve got drones, anything else?

Randi Altman: I expect to see more editors embracing color and I think that’s going to be easier for them based on tools like Resolve and Adobe Premiere, which allow for coloring within those systems. I don’t think that the high end colorist is going anywhere, there is always a need for them, but I think that some of the editors out there will definitely be taking advantage of some of these tools and doing some color work.

Larry Jordan: Well, if you think about it, even with YouTube videos, they’re all over the map in terms of color and anything that we can do to make even simple movies look better I think is a good thing; and the more people know about color, the more opportunities there are for the high end to take advantage of basic skills and then bring it up to the next level. I think color is absolutely migrating to the mainstream. Any other trends? Do you realize, CES is coming up next week? I can’t wait to go to Las Vegas and see what the latest toys are. Anything that you’re looking to see at CES besides the latest virtual reality glasses?

Randi Altman: I’m looking forward to seeing the next generation of phones that are out there, because when you’ve got people shooting 4K on their handhelds, I’m curious what’s next.

Larry Jordan: And curious of what’s next is what 2016 is all about. Randi, thanks for joining us today. Have yourself a wonderful new year and we’ll see you next week.

Randi Altman: Thank you. Take care, Larry.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman is the editor in chief of postperspective.com. You can visit her website for some amazing interviews with leaders in the industry; and we’ll be back with Randi’s Perspective on the News next week.

Larry Jordan: To read more from Randi Altman, visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: Philip, last week we spent a lot of time talking about trends that were going on in 2015. Tonight, we’re devoting the show to looking forward to 2016, so put your prognosticating hat on. What are you expecting from the new year?

Philip Hodgetts: I’m expecting that most of my predictions will be wrong.

Larry Jordan: Oh, go out on a limb.

Philip Hodgetts: I think probably this will be the year that Final Cut Pro 10 is finally taken seriously, that there’s enough evidence that even those people who are still going through separation issues from the way it was launched will get over that and realize that it may not suit them but it is a viable professional tool and a lot of people are using it, so it’ll be nice to get over that. There’s been enough controversy over it since it was released and too many people are still letting the way it was released get in the way of what’s a damn good application and every bit as capable as Premiere Pro or Media Composer in the professional editing space.

Larry Jordan: Yes, but if we look back two weeks, remember the flurry that blew up when Beats announced that they were hiring an Avid or Premiere person and all of a sudden the world was ending and the Twittersphere just exploded? And Beats isn’t even a part of Apple in that regard, it’s totally separate from Apple HQ, and everybody was saying, “It’s my NLE and not yours,” and the fingerpointing was just as fast as ever.

Philip Hodgetts: Well, it was definitely a click bait link. As you said, Beats is a completely separate company. It is owned by Apple, but I suspect that maybe they had some visitation from people on the Final Cut Pro team to explain to them just why Final Cut Pro 10 would be a much better choice for them in production and I suspect that every other Apple subsidiary is having a little review of their production features. But it’s very common.

Philip Hodgetts: Apple makes no dictate as to what their commercials have to be edited on. Internally, they obviously use Final Cut for all internal production – they always have since they acquired it, both versions. Outside companies that are contractors or independent of Apple don’t necessarily have to use that but, as I said, I suspect that Beats might be strongly encouraged to move over to the modern platform that Apple supports.

Larry Jordan: Well, I think it points out just a bigger issue – that we still like to define ourselves in terms of the tools that we use as opposed to the jobs that we create and that, I think, is always going to cause a problem as long as we are tool operators rather than storytellers. What do you think?

Philip Hodgetts: Absolutely. I still cringe to this day when somebody describes themselves as an Avid editor, or defined by the tool. Carpenters don’t define themselves by the brand of saw that they use. I’ve never heard of somebody describing themselves as a Ryobi carpenter or anything remotely like that. The engine tuning products that your garage uses, you don’t care about them.

Philip Hodgetts: I don’t know why we are so obsessed with the tools. Partly, I guess, it’s because the tools take a long time to learn to a degree of fluidity and there is a big investment in that, but really I think it’s a projection of insecurity, that I’m not really sure that I made the right decision because I really don’t know the capabilities of every single tool, so I’m going to defend my decision as being the right one because I made it, and there’s a little bit of that goes on. Hopefully we’ll get over that and realize that, look, if you’re using iMovie, it’s going to be perfectly fine. If you’re a storyteller you can tell a story with Windows Moviemaker, iMovie on an iPad, anything, it’s the storytelling skills that matter. How you use the edits to advance the story and effect emotion is really what’s important. It’s whatever’s most comfortable for you.

Philip Hodgetts: I think we’re in a great era where there are no bad choices, there can only be inappropriate choices for you, but every NLE that’s available now is capable of being used in a fully professional environment. Whether it suits you, that’s another question.

Larry Jordan: Ok, so we’ve got Final Cut 10 now sitting on a professional shelf. What else are you expecting for 2016?

Philip Hodgetts: I’m actually really intrigued by the iPad Pro. I’ve heard from a couple of early adopters and they seem to find it a very viable field production tool with a camera built in, straight into iMovie on the iPad Pro, it’s got a big enough screen and enough storage space to make that viable, and immediate uploads. You have an intelligent camera that you can edit on and upload as well, so I think that’s going to be an important trend. A lot of production is going to happen on cell phones and pad devices simply because it can be and they’re always with you. I’m often asked, “What’s the best camera?” and of course the absolute best camera is the one that I have with me when I want to take a picture or a piece of video.

Philip Hodgetts: I do B roll for our cooking shows wherever I see something that’s interesting, so a meat cabinet of aging meat in Gallagher’s Restaurant in New York, New York. I’m not sure when exactly I might want to use that, but I can capture the B roll while I’m there for when I use it in the future. So having small cameras – and I think small cameras, as I mentioned in the wrap-up show, are an important trend – we can put cameras where we never could put cameras before and get footage that we could never have before. People put GoPros all over the place on a production in the hope that they might get just three seconds of really unique footage that they couldn’t have got any other way and these inexpensive very small cameras make it very easy.

Larry Jordan: One of the issues of having more cameras and more camera formats is suddenly storage becomes even more important. What I was noticing in 2015 is that, one, there was a lot of longevity left in spinning media, they keep holding more and more on a hard disk, and SSDs still have not dropped in price, nor have they increased in storage. Are you seeing new storage trends coming in 2016?

Philip Hodgetts: I don’t think we’re seeing much that’s uniquely new. We’re seeing faster storage and more affordable storage. We’re getting tools like SHARESTATION from Lumaforge that are shared storage in a much more affordable package than we’ve been used to with the hundreds of thousands of dollars of package, and that’s an area which I think is still ripe for disruption – shared storage that’s suitable for a very small shop, two or three, four people. Most of the solutions are at the Media Enterprise level and that’s not really appropriate for the small shop.

Philip Hodgetts: I think storage is just consolidating and becoming bigger so we can lose more at once, RAID storage, so that it’s protected, and just slowly processes just trending down. I’m amazed, three terabyte portable drive on Amazon a week or two ago was under $140 and I thought, “No, I don’t really need another portable drive right now but that’s outstanding.”

Larry Jordan: I bought a four terabyte drive two weeks ago and it was $120. Four terabytes. It’s just ridiculous. What’s your take on virtual reality? Is it going to move into storytelling or is it going to stay with games?

Philip Hodgetts: I’m pretty sure that we’re going to move into storytelling with virtual reality. It’s going to take a while because it’s going to be a new medium and people will take a while to understand how you best tell a story within that medium. Unlike 3D, I think the immersiveness of the virtual reality environment will allow more complicated and interesting stories and I think it’ll be a nightmare to produce because you won’t have one fixed storyline that you have to pass through, this is the whole interactive storytelling which has been tried before but never, I think, really conquered. If we can get that conquered now with virtual reality, I think that will become very, very immersive and very powerful. It has a lot of applications in training and education as well.

Larry Jordan: Philip, for people who want to keep track of your thinking and your writing, where can they go on the web?

Philip Hodgetts: The best place is philiphodgetts.com or you can find me on lumberjacksystem.com or intelligentassistance.com.

Larry Jordan: Philip Hodgetts at philiphodgetts.com, it’s been a wonderful year spending time listening to your thinking and I look forward to doing the same thing in 2016. Thank you very much.

Philip Hodgetts: My pleasure.

Larry Jordan: Still to come on The Buzz.

Larry Jordan: When you’re working with media, one thing is essential – your computer needs peak performance. However, when it comes to upgrading your Mac, there are so many different options to choose from that the process can be confusing. That’s why Other World Computing carries the best upgrades that let your computer performance and storage grow as your needs grow.

Larry Jordan: Since 1988, OWC has become one of the most trusted names in quality hardware and comprehensive support to the worldwide computer industry. With an extensive online catalog of Mac, iPhone and iPad enhancement products, as well as a dedicated team of knowledgeable experts providing first rate tech support, OWC has everything you need to take your current system to the next level. Whether you need to maximize your system’s memory, add blazing speed or enhance reliability, look no further than the friendly experts at OWC. Learn more by visiting macsales.com today. That’s macsales.com.

Larry Jordan: Ned Soltz is an author, an editor, an educator and a consultant on all things related to digital video. He’s also a contributing editor for Digital Video magazine, a moderator on 2Pop and Creative Cow forums and a regular correspondent here on The Buzz. As always, I’m delighted to say Ned, welcome back.

Ned Soltz: Always good to be back, Larry, and Happy New Year to you and to all of our viewers. I postponed my New Year celebration until after we’re finished, just to make certain that I’m absolutely completely coherent, but the Korbel is chilling in the fridge right now, so you’re the beginning of my New Year celebration.

Larry Jordan: I appreciate that very much and I want to duck when you pop the cork. A very Happy New Year to you as well. We’re devoting tonight’s show to looking forward to 2016. You spent a lot of time last week telling us about some new camera technology that caught your eye last year, but what are you expecting from the new year?

Ned Soltz: Well, I’m hoping in the new year to see much more with HDR, with high dynamic range, because already we have the cameras that can shoot the high dynamic range, we certainly have the software that can deal with high dynamic range. I’m looking for that in displays right now. Hopefully we’ll begin to see, if not in the new year actual physical delivery, perhaps proposals in the new year for HDR standards and the beginning of monitors that are going to be able to display HDR in price ranges that are both the astronomical as well as certainly the higher end price range. I think that’s where video and production really needs to go right now and I suspect we’re going to see a lot more of that over the coming year.

Larry Jordan: Do you think HDR is going to take some of the steam out of the engine for 4K and 8K, that once you see HDR the migration to higher resolution is going to lose force?

Ned Soltz: Well, that was the great debate last year at NAB, which was do we want more pixels or better pixels? And I think we’re going to see that debate continue with HDR. We’re seeing it to some degree right now with the OLED TVs. As an example, with the LG OLED TV, you can get both an HD version and a 4K version and the HD version’s about $2,000 and the 4K version’s about $4,000. But if you look at a $2,000 OLED TV in HD up against one of the midrange 4K UHD TVs today, you’re probably going to take the OLED TV, it’s going to look better. So I think while on the one level it’s going to be the 4K kind of mantra, on the other side of it I think what people are going to be more attracted to is actually how the image looks. Now, obviously if we’re going to be able to blend the worlds of HDR and 4K, that’s going to be the best of all possible scenarios.

Larry Jordan: I don’t want to start a debate that’s really over, but are you going to be able to see 4K when you’re sitting at a living room distance from a 55 inch screen?

Ned Soltz: Actually, you are. I’m pretty much amazed at this. Just a few weeks ago, I lamented the loss of our trusty old Panasonic plasma TV. I loved that set, I loved the picture that it delivered and one day it just went poof, so I did replace it with one of the 2015 models of the Samsung. They call it an SU HD, which is their quantum dot technology, whatever that means, but it’s basically a color space somewhere between Rec. 709 and DCIP3 and, believe me, I can see the difference, whether it is an up ressed 4K signal or whether it’s a 4K coming from Netflix or the like. In fact, it is too good, it is too sharp. I found myself dumbing that TV down by turning down a lot of the sharpness and by doing other tweaks in the picture profile. I think you can see it, you can see it too much. There’s a point where the quality is excessive and it’s lost its fantasy now.

Larry Jordan: I’m a big fan of HDR and I’m looking forward to that rolling out into the broad market, but if we put HDR aside, what other trends are you looking to see for the next year?

Ned Soltz: Well, I’m certainly looking to see fewer new cameras and much more development for the existing cameras. I think manufacturers are beginning to recognize that they just cannot keep obsoleting their existing camera line and expecting people to throw away a two or three year old camera and immediately buy a new one, so we’ll probably see much more firmware development. Sony had already said, as an example, for their F55 series they saw really as potentially five year cameras and we’re going to be seeing that right now, even in midrange cameras from Panasonic and JVC and from other vendors, that we’re going to be looking at the very least at three year cameras, so we’ll be seeing incremental firmware developments of these cameras.

Ned Soltz: I am hoping that we’ll see something from Apple which has been completely MIA in terms of professional hardware. I’m going onto 2016 with a 2013 Mac Pro. Apple just worries me right now and also we haven’t seen an update to Final Cut 10 for a while and I am hoping that Apple hasn’t forgotten about Final Cut 10 but continues the excellent stream of development that they’ve had up to this point. So it’s a hope and it’s a concern from Apple.

Ned Soltz: Obviously we’re going to see ongoing increments from Blackmagic with DaVinci Resolve, which I love as a color grader and color corrector and I’m actually even learning how to use it from the perspective of being a colorist. The software itself is remarkably easy to use, being a colorist is another set of skills. But I’ve yet to really be taken by its editing features. I think they’re there, they’re very nice, it’s a little slow, it’s a little cumbersome and I hope they put some development into that editing area of it, which I’m positive they will be.

Ned Soltz: The other thing is I’m looking forward to the great excitement of what I see coming out of small vendors right now, people with small machine shops making new sliders or camera accessories, people with small shops creating new and interesting and intriguing products that may or may not be funded by vendors, as we talked about last week, but I think that is another area of great creativity and I think great potential of people who are extraordinarily talented in terms of computer programming and people extraordinarily talented in terms of electronics and metallurgy and industrial design, so I think we’ll see a lot more of that.

Larry Jordan: Well, Randi Altman mentioned in her segment that she’s very interested in virtual reality. What’s your sense on that?

Ned Soltz: I love it, I’m interested, I think it’s really got a great way to go. We’re seeing GoPro, for example, with its VR development. There’s even this cute little Kodak 360 camera and I think VR is amazing. I, like all other New York Times subscribers, got my little VR glasses and you log on to the app and there it is in VR, so I think that’s another exciting technology which is also going to be very accessible to the consumer and even accessible to the developer on multiple levels because you can evolve a cheap VR acquisition system, you can go all the way end to a high end VR acquisition system, and in this interactive age I think it’s got a lot of potential. I would agree with her.

Larry Jordan: What other trends are you keeping your eye on as we wrap up our conversation?

Ned Soltz: Oh, I think I’m keeping my eyes open for greater sophistication in particularly long GOP codecs. Each year they seem to be getting stronger and stronger to the point that many times you can’t tell the difference between an iFrame and a long GOP codec, so I think we’ll continue to see development in that area and direction and also in terms of camera sensitivities, of the increasing development of the CMOS chips to eliminate much of the rolling shutter and Jell-o vision, global shutters or at least compensation for that in the hardware design of these sensors, so I think that’s another direction that we’re going; and then lighting is a whole other area as we move into other forms of LED lighting with no green spikes, with much higher CRIs, so that’s another untouched area right now and that’s the excitement, really, of lighting. If you can say lights are exciting, now they are.

Larry Jordan: Ned, just listening to you gets me excited about new technology. For people who want to know more about what you’re writing, where can they go on the web?

Ned Soltz: They can always go to www.creativeplanetnetworks.com, where you’ll find a plethora of articles from me and from many of my other colleagues writing for the New Bay Media family of publications.

Larry Jordan: That’s creativeplanetnetworks.com and Ned Soltz himself is a contributing editor. Ned, thanks for joining us today.

Ned Soltz: Thank you, Larry, and Happy New Year to everyone.

Larry Jordan: And a Happy New Year to you. Take care.

Larry Jordan: In his current role as Director of Technology at Keycode Media, Michael Kammes consults on the latest in technology and best practices in the digital media communications space. Also in his spare time, he creates a new series of web videos called Five Things and basically lives and breathes tech. Hello, Michael, welcome back.

Michael Kammes: Hello, Larry. Good to see you again.

Larry Jordan: A very Happy New Year. New Year’s Eve today, New Year’s tomorrow, I hope you had a good Christmas and a good holiday tomorrow.

Michael Kammes: Thank you very much, I appreciate it, and to you and your team as well. Thank you.

Larry Jordan: Thank you. We’re devoting tonight’s show to look forward at 2016, so let me just give you a general question – what are you expecting from the new year?

Michael Kammes: I’m expecting people wanting more storage, because they don’t want to delete anything.

Larry Jordan: I think just more storage in general. I have yet to find somebody who says, “Please give me a smaller hard disk.”

Michael Kammes: We’ve got a couple of things which are very interesting. I’m sure you’ve been reading the blogs that the new helio drives were released a couple of months ago and those are ten terabytes, but we’re still not finding the cost of the per terabyte dropping drastically. We’re still looking at sub-30 or 40 cents for consumer oriented drives, we’re still seeing 80 or 90 cents to a dollar per gig for more robust enterprise solutions, so a lot of folks are looking into what else is there besides disk.

Larry Jordan: You mentioned a helio drive. I haven’t heard of this. Tell me about that.

Michael Kammes: They’re drives that internally have helium inside, which helps with the amount of air pressure that’s actually on the platters inside the drive. It also, with newer technology, allows you to cram more data on the drive, so coming out in ten terabyte capacities allows you to keep more data and delete less.

Larry Jordan: Do you realize that you said ten terabytes with a straight face? Think about this. Ten terabytes is just a phenomenal amount of room to squeeze onto spinning media.  I’m just blown away, and we accept it. It’s just amazing.

Michael Kammes: It boggles the mind, but when we look at 4K and image sequences and these larger files that are being generated from set, we need a place to keep that and that’s why we’re looking at not only larger spinning discs but also other solutions. LTO is obviously getting larger, LTO 7 now, but also there is a new acronym and that’s ODA – optical disk archive. Maybe like you, Larry, when I was younger, I had a CD changer in my car and you could put multiple discs in there. Well, that’s kind of what ODA is. It’s a cartridge that has multiple Blu-Rays in it that stores data and, since it’s random access, being a disc like a CD ROM or a DVD, it allows you to randomly access this data even quicker and it’s cheaper per terabyte than spinning disc.

Larry Jordan: But the ODAs are using a technology which, if I remember correctly, is mpeg2 and it’s a Sony video format. Are we storing data in its native format or are we compressing data into this older video format?

Michael Kammes: It’s a lot like the LTFS technology that we’re using for LTO tapes. It’s using it as a storage medium, so we’re copying the file as it stands, as it is, as opposed to compressing video into a mpeg2 or with Blu-Ray H.264 format, so it’s just another storage medium.

Larry Jordan: Ok, so clearly we need more storage and, with ten terabyte drives – and I can’t believe I’m actually saying that phrase – coming along and ODA, which I had a chance to look at at a Keycode seminar about three months ago and it looked very impressive, the one thing you didn’t mention was SSDs. SSDs are still very expensive, they’re still very small. Is there any breakthrough technology that we can expect in 2016 that could open up that high performance format?

Michael Kammes: At this point, it’s just cheaper prices and, although it’s great to get larger sizes, it still isn’t handling the amount of storage we need for unscripted shows or long form documentaries, so we’re seeing it used primarily for a user’s OS or for a cache, maybe on a per project basis, moving just that media to the spinning disc, working with it and then pushing it off to spinning disc or LTO tape on a chunked basis.

Larry Jordan: One of the things you mentioned last week when we were looking back at 2015 was the fact that prices are continuing their race to the floor and so it sounds like SSDs, rather than increasing the technology or performance, are just lowering the prices. We’ve seen that storage is one of the big things you’re looking for 2016. What else are you looking at?

Michael Kammes: Well, I think we’re seeing workflows that involve more color manipulation from on set. For years, we were doing Rec.709 for HD and that was the chosen color space. That’s the weapon we were handed. Now we’re getting more cameras that can shoot in various color spaces – LOGC is pretty common – so being able to incorporate that or even Aces on the higher level, we’re now dealing with these color spaces that have to have manipulation in post which adds one more layer of complexity when dealing with footage in post.

Larry Jordan: You know, Michael, I just realized we haven’t even talked about cameras. What do you expect to have happen in cameras next year?

Michael Kammes: I can let you in on some insider info. There will be a new camera in the next few months and there will be another new camera a few months after that.

Larry Jordan: Oh man, you go out on a limb, and now you’re going to tell me there’s going to be new camera codecs to go with them.

Michael Kammes: Oh yes, H.269 I think is the next one. What we’re seeing, though, is something that’s been coming down the pipe for a couple of years, and that’s obviously HDR and various color spaces being used on location for acquisition, which in turn requires workflows downwind of that in post. But these cameras require extreme care on set to have a DP that understands what you’re shooting in, as well as when you’re viewing that on set. We’re also seeing an increase in PTZ cameras, and for those out there who aren’t familiar with PTZ, it’s yet another acronym and stands for pan tilt zoom. These are cameras that are motorized, usually controlled by a joystick, and can either be IP based over the network or via a joystick. I’m not going to say it replaces a cameraperson, it doesn’t do that by any stretch, but for a wide shot you may not need to staff that. For houses of worship or other places where you don’t need a lot of camera movement, we’re seeing PTZ cameras really take a very solid place there.

Larry Jordan: Now, where does HDR fit into this? Because I’m really excited about the potential that HDR has for just massively improving image quality.

Michael Kammes: It does, and there’s obviously been a lot of discussion about should we go 4K or should we go HDR? Maybe HDR/HD is better than 4K, which I tend to lean a little bit towards. Then again, bigger’s better, so I like 4K too. But HDR, where it kind of becomes a little bit cumbersome is the workflow in post. A lot of the NLEs out there are not supporting HDR workflows and all the information out there on the web seems to change with every software revision. So there isn’t a dyed in the wool workflow for HDR through all the NLEs that can be tracked all the way through online and finishing.

Larry Jordan: Well, part of the problem we’ve got is that we don’t have a solid spec for HDR. There’s still a war going on in terms of whether it’s Rec. 2020 or whether it’s going to be Dolby Vision or something else. But one of the things I’m most encouraged by is the fact that people are actually now starting to see HDR become real, with Adobe Premiere releasing HDR support and we’re going to see monitors that support HDR at CES. So for me, I think HDR is a trend that we need to keep our eyes on for next year. Would you agree?

Michael Kammes: I would certainly agree. The one thing that has always concerned me is – and I don’t want to get up on a soap box here – but creatives like to create and I think the more we throw technology options at them, sometimes they drown in that. There are many times that you may not have to shoot on set in LOGC, you can use Rec. 709. There may be an opportunity to use HDR and there may be a time when you don’t need it for that particular shoot, and so I really don’t want people to drown in that technology and be overwhelmed by the amount of technological options out there.

Larry Jordan: Ah, but then we’d have nothing to talk about, which is what all of next year is going to be. Michael, for people who want to keep track of what you’re writing and thinking, where can they go on the web?

Michael Kammes: Michaelkammes.com on the internet as well as Twitter or, as you mentioned, my web series, fivethingsseries.com.

Larry Jordan: So that’s michaelkammes.com and the Michael himself has been joining us. Michael, thanks for joining us today. I always enjoy our visits.

Michael Kammes: Thanks Larry, I appreciate it.

Larry Jordan: Still to come on The Buzz.

Larry Jordan: The folks at Blackmagic Design keep shaking up the industry. The new DaVinci Resolve 12 could be all the video editor you need. DaVinci Resolve 12 combines professional non-linear video editing with the world’s most advanced color corrector, so now you can edit, color correct, finish and deliver all from one system.

Larry Jordan: The brand new Blackmagic Video Assist is a high resolution professional monitor and recorder that allows you to see a full pixel 1080 image large enough so you can focus a DSLR camera accurately; and the new Ursa Mini cameras provide stunning quality with a 4.6K sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range, compact, lightweight and built from advanced magnesium alloy.

Larry Jordan: When it comes to state of the art technology, look first at Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com. That’s blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan: Larry O’Connor founded Other World Computing, which is also called OWC, in 1988. Their website, which you may know better than their company name, is macsales.com. OWC is both a reseller and a developer and they support all things Mac and have been doing that for more than 25 years. Hello, Larry, welcome back.

Larry O’Connor: Hey. Thanks for having me back, Larry.

Larry Jordan: And a very Happy New Year to you.

Larry O’Connor: Sure, and to you and yours. I’m looking forward to 2016 rolling in quick here.

Larry Jordan: Yes, well, we’ve just got a few hours, at least on the West Coast. It’s already happening elsewhere in the country. I was just thinking, last week we spent our entire time talking about trends that we saw in 2015 that caught our attention. I want to flip that this week and look forward to 2016. What are you expecting from the new year?

Larry O’Connor: We’ve kind of taken that first painful step to where a lot of systems don’t have those PCAE slots, they don’t have a lot of ports, external, but we have Thunderbolt and, while Thunderbolt’s been great, it’s a little bit low on the bandwidth side versus what we’ve had in the past. In 2016, a little bit further into the year is going to usher in Thunderbolt 3, which I really think starts to fully capitalize on the promise of Thunderbolt.

Larry Jordan: What’s the difference between Thunderbolt 2 and Thunderbolt 3?

Larry O’Connor: The original Thunderbolt was 10 gigabits, so probably about 1.2 gigabytes a second throughput, but you have to take off overhead for display port. Thunderbolt 2, there’s 20 gigabits and if we take the display port overhead off for that, about 1.4 gigabytes of data throughput. Now we have Thunderbolt 3, which doubles that again to 40 gigabits and now you have a percentage of that being eaten by your display channel. Now you’re talking about well over 30 gigabits of actual data throughput available and, while that’s not what a PCI slot gave, you now have a substantially increased, more than a doubling of real available bandwidth. It’s much faster.

Larry Jordan: Now, my understanding about Thunderbolt 3 is that it’s finally fast enough to support 4K, even 5K displays, which Thunderbolt 2 was not able to support. Is that a true statement?

Larry O’Connor: Thunderbolt 2’s display port supports 4K and 5K displays but it eats up a big chunk of the bandwidth, that reduces your availability, even if you don’t have a display attached, for other devices and data storage. In terms of Thunderbolt 3, you now have the throughput… available through a single channel for doing external editing and real time work with 4K and even beyond.

Larry Jordan: Ok, so we’ve got Thunderbolt 3 to look forward to. What else are you looking forward to?

Larry O’Connor: Thunderbolt 3 kind of plays in all things. Right now, when you look to adding capability to your system and certainly supporting the kinds of editing, the kinds of production work that people are already doing, Thunderbolt 3 now makes it really possible to have more of your cake and eat it too. There are a lot of Mac Pro 2010 and 2012s still in service because they’ve got those slots and they need them for the bandwidth that they offer.

Larry O’Connor: More and more of those kinds of solution needs you’ll be able to support through Thunderbolt 3, so the biggest trend is going to be further customization, being able to buy a core box that comes with very little other than this external expandability via Thunderbolt and turn it into what you need to be. Solid state, of course, will continue to get faster and larger. You’ll see good internal storage for the actual processing work, exceptional external arrays and then big spinners. Spinning platter drives will still be a big part of the equation for the store and handle those data flows on the outside.

Larry Jordan: So you’re saying one of the big benefits of Thunderbolt 3 is that it’s going to unlock a whole lot more storage at the same or a lower price. Am I hearing that correctly?

Larry O’Connor: Yes, that would be the true statement. Thunderbolt 2 on its own is plenty fast for the majority, but when you need to add a PCI card for doing external processing or you need more GPU capability, Thunderbolt 2 is kind of a limiting factor, it just doesn’t have the bandwidth. Thunderbolt 3, on the other hand, starts to enable that and make that really practical.

Larry Jordan: In other words, we could start to offload processes like GPUs off to an expansion chassis, rather than have to deal with a GPU that’s inside the computer?

Larry O’Connor: You got it. The silver towers still have a lot of place in today because we need GPU’s capability. The current systems just don’t have that expansion support, you can’t throw a bunch of GPUs into a Mac Pro 2013 and doing it over Thunderbolt, you’re getting a quarter the bandwidth of a PCIE slot. Thunderbolt 3 opens up to where now you put that external GPU in a channel, there is enough bandwidth for that GPU typically to be fully utilized.

Larry Jordan: That could even allow us to have multiple GPUs running at the same time, which could be huge in terms of media and rendering.

Larry O’Connor: Absolutely.

Larry Jordan: That’s very cool. What other things are you keeping your eyes on? Or is everything revolving around storage?

Larry O’Connor: No, not everything revolves around storage, but a trend that I guess I would say I’m hoping for is – being an Apple guy – to see more stability in our OS and a focus on improving the code base and its performance as opposed to deciding this is a year where things need to be broken and remade.

Larry Jordan: Yes, there’s always a lot of debate about whether it’s nice to have a new operating system, but the problem is when it changes every year, you’re never really sure when to upgrade because you’re never sure when the operating system is stable enough to upgrade. Maybe taking a little bit longer between OS updates would be a good thing.

Larry O’Connor: Well, I’m not saying I agree with this 100 percent, although I also don’t disagree with it. I still talk to a lot of people who say 10.6.8 was Apple’s best OS to date and since then it seems to be a lot of functionality being added but the question becomes is it functionality that everybody needs? It’s going to a lot of different places and I’d love to see things really become fully optimized and bug free and the Apple OS that we know and love.

Larry Jordan: Well, as long as operating systems are as complex as they are, I think bug free is a forlorn hope, but as few bugs as possible is more realistic.

Larry O’Connor: I’d say what we have works really well, before we break it and decide it’s time for a bunch of new features and new ways of doing things.

Larry Jordan: Larry, I want to thank you so much for joining us both last week and this week with your thoughts on what to expect in 2016. Where can people go on the web to learn more about you and your company?

Larry O’Connor: They can visit owcdigital.com and they can certainly visit macsales.com to learn a whole lot.

Larry Jordan: And Larry O’Connor is the founder of OWC. Larry, thanks for joining us today.

Larry O’Connor: I’m glad to be here, and Happy New Year, Larry, and thanks for having me.

Larry Jordan: And a Happy New Year to you as well.

Larry Jordan: Jonathan Handel is an entertainment and technology attorney of Counsel at TroyGould in Los Angeles. He’s also the contributing editor on entertainment labor issues for The Hollywood Reporter and, best of all, he’s a regular here on The Buzz. Hello, Jonathan, welcome back.

Jonathan Handel: Larry, how are you?

Larry Jordan: I am doing great. It’s New Year’s Eve. How can you not be excited on New Year’s Eve? Happy New Year’s Eve to you.

Jonathan Handel: That’s pretty much right, happy New Year’s Eve.

Larry Jordan: Last week, we were talking about the key trends in 2015 and this week I want to look forward to 2016. What trends are you watching?

Jonathan Handel: One that I’m certainly watching – and this will be towards the end of the year – is the labor negotiating cycle, so the above the line contracts that the Directors, Writers and Screen Actors Guild, SAG-AFTRA, are all up in 2017 and that means that the negotiations start presumably, probably, first with the DGA in the fall of 2016. So we’re going to be looking at a process of negotiation that’s going to run basically from – when you count the run-up to that and the studying and so forth – probably from September/October of 2016 through the spring of 2017.

Larry Jordan: We’ve talked a lot over the years about the guild negotiations in Hollywood, but film is now a worldwide industry. What do the guilds do? Are they following leads from other countries? Do other countries follow the contracts negotiated here? Or is this really just an isolated labor incident to Hollywood?

Jonathan Handel: It’s interesting you should ask that. There are international associations of writers’ guilds, directors’ guilds. There’s an International Federation of Actors, which is actually not an international federation of actors at all, it’s an international federation of actors’ unions, so there are indeed international associations for each of these. In the past when they’ve tried to coordinate closely, that hasn’t always worked out well. We saw a number of years ago the attempt to unionize local actors on The Hobbit in New Zealand. The international actors were SAG but the local hires they tried to unionize through a local union and through coordination through that International Federation of Actors – FIA it’s called in the French acronym – and that didn’t work out very well, it really blew up in the union’s faces.

Jonathan Handel: So they coordinate to some extent, they certainly are always meeting and talking, and I think there’s awareness of there being numbers from different countries and of differences in the way residuals work, for example, things like that, but in terms of a tight coordination or workers of the world unite, we don’t really see that.

Larry Jordan: Another thought is actors are the largest union in Hollywood. There are 100,000 plus members just in SAG alone, if I remember correctly.

Jonathan Handel: It’s about 160,000 actually, yes.

Larry Jordan: That’s a fair number and the reason this came to mind is a couple of weeks ago the LA Times ran an article about unscrupulous agents who were taking advantage of actors, charging them fees for not delivering work and so on. Do you see any movement toward greater protection of actors against unscrupulous businesses that prey on the fact that actors just can’t find work?

Jonathan Handel: It’s a hard problem. One of the deputy city attorneys in the LA City Attorney’s Office has been very dedicated to dealing with that and has been one of the drivers of legislation that’s passed and enforcement actions and so on, but they’re always, I think, chipping away at a large iceberg because there is such an oversupply of actors, with all due respect to those who are actors. There just are a lot of people who want to act, there are a lot of people who are in town, a lot of people who pass through town and so are not necessarily as well informed as they should be about what’s legit and what isn’t, what can an agent charge you for – which basically an agent shouldn’t be charging you for anything, should be charging you ten percent and that’s the end of it.

Jonathan Handel: The problem of managers can be even more difficult because managers are not regulated in any way by the state or by the unions and so you see even more abuses, frankly, in management contracts than you tend to in agency contracts. It is difficult and only a small number of those rise to the level where you’re actually going to have a criminal enforcement action on the part of the City Attorney, and I’m afraid a lot of people do end up getting burned rather than being protected, unfortunately.

Larry Jordan: Do you see this staying as the role of the City Attorney or do you see any interest in the state in setting overall legislation that would govern agents and managers?

Jonathan Handel: Well, there is legislation that governs agents and that legislation is enforced by the state and there is some enforcement as well by the City Attorney. There isn’t legislation that governs managers per se, but if managers overstep their bounds and start acting as unlicensed agents, they can be brought before the State Labor Commission the same way agents can be. I think it’s hard to see that as getting a lot more attention, for the same reason that we saw an enormous amount of difficulty in getting increased tax incentives for movies passed, which finally did pass in California, and that’s the fact that the state is essentially its own country and Northern California has very separate interests to Southern California.

Jonathan Handel: This is largely, not exclusively of course, but is largely a Los Angeles problem and when you have so much of the state centered on the San Francisco Bay area, if you look at the Lieutenant Governor, the Governor, the Attorney General, most of the state wide officers come from the Bay area and, of course, a lot of the legislators come from the Bay area and from San Diego, they’re not all from LA by any means, obviously, or from other parts of the state that are less urbanized. So it’s difficult to get things like this on the agenda and actually effect additional changes if changes are needed.

Larry Jordan: You’ve mentioned so far that we’ve got the contract negotiations coming up and the contract negotiations are followed far outside of Hollywood. We’ve talked about the issue of rogue managers and agents. Are there any other trends you’re looking at that we should keep our eyes open for, for the next year?

Jonathan Handel: Yes, and this really relates actually to the contract negotiations, and that is that in mid-2017, SAG-AFTRA will start its next election cycle and, as we alluded to last week and as we talked about on the show, the leadership of SAG-AFTRA is somewhat fragmented right now because of frustration on the part of members over certainly aspects of the merger process, particularly the health plans not being merged.

Jonathan Handel: So that’s going to make contract negotiations particularly sensitive for SAG-AFTRA, I think, and that in turn may affect what the DGA decides to ask for later in 2016 in order to come up with a deal that’s going to work for SAG-AFTRA as well. So it’s an interlocking set of jigsaw parts – the SAG-AFTRA politics, which affect the SAG-AFTRA contract negotiations, which in turn effect the DGA contract negotiations.

Larry Jordan: Well, the only solution is we’re just going to have to hang around this next year and see how it turns out. Jonathan, for people who want more information about what you’re thinking and writing, where can they go?

Jonathan Handel: Two places – thrlabor.com and jhandel.com.

Larry Jordan: And Jonathan Handel himself is the person we’ve been talking to of Counsel at TroyGould and the entertainment labor reporter for The Hollywood Reporter. Jonathan, thanks for joining us today and have yourself a great New Year.

Jonathan Handel: Thanks. You too, Larry. Be safe.

Larry Jordan: I want to invite you to become a member of our video training library. Our training library is unique in the industry. It includes more than 1400 in depth movies, each accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Every movie in our library can be streamed to any internet connected device and it includes production and post production hardware, software and techniques. It features current and past software releases from both Apple and Adobe and, unlike YouTube, all our training is complete and, unlike other websites, we focus exclusively on media production and post production.

Larry Jordan: Best of all, our memberships are affordable, starting at only $19.99 per month. Focused, in depth, accessible and complete. This is the training that you need to solve problems, master new software and expand your business. I invite you to become a member today. Thanks.

Larry Jordan: It’s time for a Buzz Flashback. Five years ago today…

Philip Hodgetts (archive): I would love to predict that this is the year that people are going to take workflow seriously, because we will see the first of the RED Epic cameras out, we’re seeing a lot of 3D production happening – whether you and I think that’s a good thing or not, it’s inevitable that there is going to be a lot of 3D happening – and with all of that, people do need to talk about their workflow and think it through very carefully before they start.

Larry Jordan: This was a Buzz Flashback.

Larry Jordan: I want to thank our guests for this week and especially for all their contributions to The Buzz – Randi Altman, Philip Hodgetts, Michael Kammes, Larry O’Connor, Ned Soltz and Jonathan Handel and, as always, Mike Horton.

Larry Jordan: There’s a lot of history in our industry and it’s all posted to our website, at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Here you’ll find thousands of interviews all online and all available to you today; and please sign up for our free weekly show newsletter.

Larry Jordan: Talk with us on Twitter, @dpbuzz, and Facebook at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Our theme music is composed by Nathan Dugie Turner with additional music provided by smartsound.com. Text transcripts are provided by Take 1 Transcription – visit take1.tv to learn how they can help you.

Larry Jordan: Our producer is Cirina Catania; our engineering team is led by Megan Paulos and includes Ed Golya, Hannah Dean, Keegan Guy, Lindsay Luehbert, James Miller and Brianna Murphy. As we wrap up one year and move into the next, all of us at The Buzz wish you a very happy, very healthy and very profitable New Year. On behalf Mike Horton, my name is Larry Jordan and thanks for joining us for The Digital Production Buzz.

Announcer #1: The Digital Production Buzz was brought to you by Other World Computing, providing quality hardware solutions and extensive technical support to the worldwide computer industry since 1988; and by Blackmagic Design, creating revolutionary solutions for film, post production and television.

Digital Production Buzz – December 31, 2015

Join Larry Jordan and Mike Horton as they talk with Philip Hodgetts, Ned Soltz, Michael Kammes, Larry O’Connor, and Jonathan Handel.

View Show Transcript

Watch the Full Episode


Buzz on YouTubeTranscript

Listen to the Full Episode


Buzz on iTunesTranscript

Guests this Week

Philip Hodgetts
Philip Hodgetts, President, Lumberjack System
It’s New Year’s Eve and a chance for The Buzz to look forward at key trends and technologies in 2016. To start our round-table, Philip Hodgetts, CEO of Intelligent Assistance and noted industry technology guru, shares his thoughts on technology to watch in 2016.
Ned Soltz
Ned Soltz, Contributing Editor, Digital Video Magazine, Ned Soltz Inc.
Ned Soltz, contributing editor for Digital Video magazine, continues the Buzz roundtable with his thoughts on key camera technologies to watch in 2016.
Michael Kammes
Michael Kammes, Director of Technology, Key Code Media
Michael Kammes, Director of Technology for KeyCode Media, discusses the workflow trends he’s watching for 2016.
Larry O'Connor
Larry O’Connor, President & Founder, Other World Computing
Storage continues to evolve in the coming year – in capacity, speed, price and technology. Larry O’Connor, founder and CEO of Other World Computing, contributes his perspective on key storage trends to watch for 2016.
Jonathan Handel
Jonathan Handel, Entertainment/Technology Attorney & Labor Reporter, TroyGould and The Hollywood Reporter
Jonathan Handel is an entertainment and technology attorney, Of Counsel, at TroyGould in Los Angeles. He is also the contributing editor on entertainment labor issues for The Hollywood Reporter. This week, Jonathan discusses key trends driving labor, contracts and negotiations in 2016.

Transcript: Digital Production Buzz – December 24, 2015

Digital Production Buzz

December 24, 2015

[Transcripts provided by Take 1 Transcription]

(Click here to listen to this show.)

HOSTS
Larry Jordan
Mike Horton

SEGMENTS
Randi Altman’s Perspective
Tech Talk with Larry Jordan
BuZZ Flashback: Bruce Nazarian

GUESTS
Philip Hodgetts, President, Lumberjack System
Ned Soltz, Contributing Editor, Digital Video Magazine, Ned Soltz Inc.
Michael Kammes, Director, Technology, Key Code Media
Larry O’Connor, President & Founder, Other World Computing
Jonathan Handel, Entertainment/Technology Attorney & Labor Reporter, TroyGould and The Hollywood Reporter
===

Larry Jordan:  And a very happy Christmas Eve and a very merry Christmas.  Tonight on The Buzz, we take a look back at key trends during 2015.  We’ll cover hardware, software, workflow, labor and legal issues with our Buzz team, including Randi Altman, Philip Hodgetts, Ned Soltz Larry O’Connor, Michael Kammes and Jonathan Handel.  Tonight, on Christmas Eve, it’s the highlights of 2015, The Buzz starts now.

Announcer #1: Tonight’s Digital Production Buzz is brought to you by Other World Computing at macsales.com; and by Black Magic Design, at blackmagicdesign.com.

Announcer #2: Since the dawn of digital filmmaking… Authoritative…one show serves a worldwide network of media professionals… Current…uniting industry experts… Production…filmmakers… Post production…and content creators around the planet. Distribution. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now.

Larry Jordan:  And welcome to The Digital Production Buzz, the world’s longest running podcast for creative content creators and the industry, covering media production, post production, marketing and distribution around the world.  Tonight we begin the first of two special shows to end the year.  We’re going to start by taking a look back at 2015 to highlight some of the most significant trends in media, and what better place to start than our own resident expert, Mr. Mike Horton.  Hello, Mike, and a very merry Christmas to you!

Mike Horton:   Thank you, Larry.  Thank you very much, and a merry Christmas to you, merry night-before-Christmas!  By the way, what’s your favorite Christmas carol song?

Larry Jordan:  Carol of the Bells.

Mike Horton:  Carol of the Bells.  Little Drummer Boy.  Don’t know the words, I always forget the words but, boy, I love that song.

Larry Jordan:  Yes, that’s very true.

Mike Horton:  That’s a song that gets you in the spirit.  Anyway, I’m in the spirit.

Larry Jordan:  Well, thinking of getting in the spirit, as you look back on 2015, what strikes you as significant about the year?  I want to get your opinion before I ask some of the other guys.

Mike Horton:  Two come to mind really quickly: VR, drones.  Drones and VR, they took over the entire year as far as I was concerned; drones especially were in the news almost every day.  VR, especially just in the last few months.  Giant corporations and companies are growing up around this whole industry.  I guarantee you, in January at CES you’re going to see this thing explode.  It doesn’t feel like 3D, it feels like it’s something that’s sustainable, that people are actually going to use, and I think whatever business models are out there – right now gaming seems to be the only business model, everything else I’m not really sure – but I do know that every studio is on board.  There’s a lot of companies getting on board in terms of filming all the added extras for DVDs.  It’s exploding.

Larry Jordan:  Well, I know Randi Altman is definitely looking forward to seeing how VR develops, but I also was just thinking that you spend a lot of time working with user groups.  What’s been happening with user groups over the last year?

Mike Horton: You know, it’s a fight.  It’s a fight to get people to come out of their little cubicles, their offices, their homes and to meet one another face to face.  It’s always been a fight, and it still continues to be that.  In fact, it gets harder and harder each year because technology develops, and the fact that you and I can have this conversation together, where I’m at my home, you’re at your home or you’re in your office, and we can see each other and we can see behind each other, it just makes it that much more difficult.  But it’s still very, very important for people who are very serious about what they do to get out of the house and shake the hands of somebody that’s a lot smarter than they are.

Larry Jordan: Well, you know, networking is still critical in our industry, not only who you know but who knows you.

Mike Horton: And it’s hard to get the young ‘uns to kind of get out there and do that sort of thing, but I keep trying, and I will keep trying and, eventually, darn it, they’ll listen!

Larry Jordan: Well, Michael, have yourself a great holiday, and we’ll chat with you next week as we celebrate New Year’s Eve together and look forward to 2016.

Mike Horton: Alright, merry Christmas to you and everybody else behind you.

Larry Jordan: And merry Christmas to you as well.  By the way, I want to remind you to subscribe to our free weekly show newsletter at digitalproductionbuzz.com.  Every issue, every week, gives you an inside look at both The Buzz and the industry, plus quick links to all the different segments on the show.  Best of all, every issue is free.  I’ll be back with Philip Hodgetts right after Randi Altman’s Perspective on the news.

Larry Jordan: This is Randi Altman’s Perspective.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman has been writing about our industry for more than 20 years.  In fact, she is the editor in chief of postperspective.com and, as always, it’s a delight to say welcome Randi, good to have you back.

Randi Altman: Hi Larry, happy Christmas Eve!

Larry Jordan:  And a very happy Christmas Eve to you too.  Thanks for taking time out of your holiday schedule to join us, but I wanted to start the show taking a look back at 2015 by talking with you.  What were some of the highlights that you’ve seen over the last year that stick in your mind?

Randi Altman: Some of the trends?  Well, one in particular would be virtual reality.

Larry Jordan:  Why so?

Randi Altman: It came in strong at the beginning of the year, and it has not let go.  More and more workflows, ways to view it, people interested.  It’s just rolling along.

Larry Jordan:  Well, you’ve been a big fan of virtual reality since we started talking with you on these perspectives, so I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts next week as we look forward to what’s happening in 2016.  But what other trends have come to your mind over the last year?

Randi Altman: Well, High Dynamic Range has been a talking point throughout the year.  More and more people have been interested in those kind of workflows.  Adobe recently announced that they can work with High Dynamic Range workflows, so we’ll be seeing more of that, I think.

Larry Jordan:  You know, I’m a big fan of HDR since I saw a technical demonstration of it about a year and a half ago, but it’s just amazing how all that additional light changes your perception of the image.  The biggest challenge, I think, that we’ve had, is that we haven’t been able to look at it; there’s been no monitors on the market for the last year, which we’ll talk more about when we chat with you next week.  Any other trends that caught your mind in terms of editing software or the post process?

Randi Altman: Not necessarily on that end, but I think on the production end, I’ve been seeing more and more people, including feature films, shooting on a variety of different cameras and not just picking one or the other.  They’re picking, essentially, a camera for a particular scene,  including using GoPros or iPhones, the 6S, which can shoot 4K, so I have found that to be very interesting.

Larry Jordan:  So, rather than standardizing on a single codec for shooting, we’re seeing multiple codecs used in production, and we’ve got to standardize in post.  That’s a shift, it  seems to me.

Randi Altman: Yes, absolutely.

Larry Jordan: What I’d like to do is get some opinions of our Buzz family, to see what they think has happened in 2015, and then come back to you next week, and put our prognostication hat on and see what you’re thinking is for 2016.  Does that work for you?

Randi Altman: It does, Larry, absolutely.

Larry Jordan: Randi is the editor in chief of postperspective.com.  Visit her website for all the most fascinating interviews in our industry.  Randi, a wonderful holiday to you, and we’ll see you next week.

Randi Altman: Thank you, Larry.  Take care!

Larry Jordan:  To read more from Randi Altman, visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan:  Philip Hodgetts is the CEO of Intelligent Assistance and Lumberjack Systems.  He is also involved with technology in virtually every area of digital production and post production.  Even better, he is a regular contributor to The Buzz.  Hello, Philip!  Welcome back.

Philip Hodgetts: Thank you for having me.

Larry Jordan:  And a very merry Christmas Eve to you.

Philip Hodgetts:  Merry Christmas to you too!

Larry Jordan:  I wore my lumberjack and Christmas shirt just for you today.

Philip Hodgetts:  I appreciate that, yes, very much.

Larry Jordan:  We’re devoting tonight’s show to take a look back at 2015 and see what some of the trends are, and I couldn’t think of a better person to start with than yourself.  So, as you look back at the year, what trends come first to mind?

Philip Hodgetts:  I think the nicest thing about 2015 is that it’s been kind of a consolidation year.  There’s been nothing new and radical this year that’s upset us and thrown us in a loop.  You know, no completely new camera technology, no completely new editing system, no completely new codec.  Okay, we’re starting to have to deal with H.265, but it’s a soft roll out; we don’t have to worry about that too much just yet.  So it’s been a nice year of consolidation and thank goodness for that, because we need one of those pretty regularly because, if we’re constantly in turmoil every year it’s not good in general, because it’s not good to be reinventing workflows every second week.  So I think it’s been a nice consolidation year.  It’s the year that we’ve seen 4K production become routine, that it’s no longer special.  4K is what you produce if you can afford to, if there’s likely to be any legs on the program material.  It’s also a consolidation year of getting smaller.  We’ve got 4K GoPros, which are tiny.  We’ve got micro cameras from Black Magic Design and other people, both studio and field cameras, that are incredibly tiny compared with what we were used to.  Now, of course, no one toy is perfect for every situation, but having these small cameras, small mounts, opens up a whole lot of new opportunities for production.  This is the year that my partner Greg, and I have produced a lunch video series, where we simply go into a restaurant, put up a couple of GoPros, some microphones on people and record a lunch conversation.

Larry Jordan:  But I want to pick up on a word that you used.  You called it a year of consolidation, and it doesn’t sound like companies are acquiring other companies, they’re not consolidating that way; it sounds more like everybody’s taken a deep breath and it’s a pause before the next big thing.  Am I hearing that correctly?

Philip Hodgetts:  Exactly.  That was the intent, not so much consolidation of companies being bought up or technologies being brought together, but simply a year where nothing too dramatically new was introduced.  I can’t think of a single hugely dramatic release this year that changed the entire production world.  You know, we’ve had it in the past where we had the Red digital cameras coming around, and workflows associated with that.  We had it in 2011 with FinalCut Pro 10 coming.  We’ve had it with a lot of the cameras from Black Magic, who we weren’t expecting to make cameras.  So we’ve had years where there have been some fairly dramatic overturns, changes in the industry that have just created turmoil and the need to generate new workflows.  Offline, how do we link these new media formats?  Once we get those sort of initially conquered, then it’s nice to just be able to roll them out on feature film or production after production.   It’s those times when things are in turmoil that makes it very difficult for everybody in production to have to deal with this constantly changing terrain under their feet, and having some sort of stability for a while lets us consolidate workflows that work, and that everyone is familiar with.

Larry Jordan:  Two things that surprised me, though on the software side.  One was the rise of DaVinci Resolve.  It has continued to evolve into now some people consider it an editing package of its own worth.  The other is the rapid development that Adobe’s been putting Premier through.  It’s not anywhere near the same software that it was a year ago.  What do you think about both of those?

Philip Hodgetts:  I think you’re right.  Both are exciting in their own way.  I honestly don’t really know what to make of DaVinci Resolve.  I mean, certainly it is a basic editing platform at this point.  It could probably still use a little bit better media management and some key word ranges would be nice, but maybe that’s proprietary to other people!  But certainly, Black Magic are putting the effort into bringing in new features and, if they continue with 80 to 100 new features per year, then it gets to a point where it has to be taken seriously as … as well as a finishing tool, as well as a DIT tool for on-set use.  So they are building up from set to distribution tool, there.  I’m just not sure where the user base will come from.  I certainly think new users will come into that and the low, I think, free price will be very attractive, but I think the company that would need to be most concerned about the rise of DaVinci Resolve, particularly since it has collaboration built in, would be Avid, and it would be, I think, threatening their Media Composer product, except the Media Composer is so well entrenched that it probably doesn’t.  I see Adobe have done a lot of really, really great work with Premier Pro, and the whole suite really.  There are some really great innovations in there.  I love the character animation tools that are in After Effects and in the standalone application.  They’re certainly at the forefront of H.265 encoding.  It would be the easiest place to go to get H.265 encoding right now, and I read that, today, Netflix are planning to re-encode their entire library in H.265 for more efficient distribution.  At this point, nobody’s got H.265 playback, but I guess that will come!

Larry Jordan:  Hold it, hold it!  I want to pause on that for just a second.  I’m really excited about what H.265 means for the future and, for the first time we’re now able to encode into it using Adobe Media Encoder, but I do want a word of caution in, in that being able to encode in H.265 doesn’t mean anybody can play it back yet.  So, very much this is the time to experiment and see, but don’t shift your library over to 265, because nobody is going to be able to watch it.  Philip, we’ve talked about the fact that hardware seems to be on a plateau and there’s bubblings in software but nothing that really stands out, but the one thing we haven’t talked about is distribution, and I think distribution has changed a lot this year.  What have you noticed?

Philip Hodgetts:  Certainly, distribution has probably been the thing that’s most disrupted this year, and I think we’re seeing the beginnings of the disruption rather than the result of it.  We already have a lot more program producers, like Amazon, Netflix, Google and YouTube.  There are a lot of new players in the content space, and we’re starting to see a lot of channels come through in apps on various devices: portable devices, Apple TV.  So we’re seeing the appification of channels, I think.  You know, Netflix and Amazon do come up on an Apple TV and other Roku devices and similar places as apps.  So the channel has become the app, I think.

Larry Jordan:  The appification of channels!

Philip Hodgetts:  The appification of channels, you heard it here first!

Larry Jordan:  You should be ashamed of yourself.  Philip, what I want to do, because this really blends us into not only where we’ve been in 2015, but where we’re going next year, is to invite you back next week, and let’s take a look forward at what we could expect for 2016.  Does that work for you?

Philip Hodgetts:  That works for me.  It’s always a minefield to go through, but let’s try it!

Larry Jordan:  You know, I was just thinking we’ve been doing this look forward for years and years, and nobody’s caught us yet, so let’s see what happens for another year.  For people who want to keep track of your writing, what website can they go to?

Philip Hodgetts:  philiphodgetts.com is probably the best point of contact for me.

Larry Jordan:  And Philip Hodgetts himself is who we’ve been talking to.  Philip, is the CEO of Intelligent Assistance and Lumberjack Systems.  Philip, thanks for joining us today.

Philip Hodgetts:  My pleasure.

Larry Jordan:  Still to come on The Buzz…

Larry Jordan:  When you’re working with media, one thing is essential, your computer needs peak performance.  However, when it comes to upgrading your Mac, there are so many different options to choose from that the process can be confusing.  That’s why Other World Computing carries the best upgrades that let your computer performance and storage grow as your needs grow.  Since 1988, OWC has become one of the most trusted names in quality hardware and comprehensive support to the worldwide computer industry.  With an extensive online catalog of Mac, iPhone and iPad enhancement products, as well as a dedicated team of knowledgeable experts providing first rate tech support, OWC has everything you need to take your current system to the next level.  Whether you need to maximize your system’s memory, add blazing speed or enhance reliability, look no further than the friendly experts at OWC. Learn more by visiting macsales.com today.

Larry Jordan:  Ned Soltz is an author and editor, and consultant on all things related to digital video.  He’s also a contributing editor for Digital Video Magazine, a moderator on 2-pop and Creative Cal forums and, best of all, a regular correspondent here on The Buzz.  Hello, Ned!  Welcome back!

Ned Soltz:  Hello Larry, and to you merry Christmas, and to all Christmas celebrators listening today a merry Christmas to all of you.

Larry Jordan:  And a very merry Christmas to you too, Ned.  We’re devoting tonight’s show to look back at 2015, so what are some of the trends that caught your eye this last year?

Ned Soltz:  I think one of the trends that caught my eye last year is a couple of things that happened just in recent weeks.  We’re beginning to see particular vendors now as active financers as well as consultants in the production of hardware specifically.  A couple of years ago we saw Able Cine involved with a German manufacturer in the production of a PL mount to B4 adapter, and just this past week BenPro in LA announced that they had collaborated with a German to produce (and, obviously, then to distribute through BenPro), a rather high end line of full frame macro lenses, 100mm length and a couple that are a little bit longer.  I think one goes up to about 150.  These, of course, are very high end products, designed for full frame cameras like a Sony A7, or to the high end of that like an Alexa 65, but the fact is they’re involved now in the production and possibly even in the financing.  Now, on the level of something more affordable to the likes of you and me, although I’m sure that you’re doing well enough to afford a fleet of Alexa 65s…

Larry Jordan:  I don’t even bother to buy them anymore; they’re a drag on the market.

Ned Soltz:  Yeah, right!  There is this really cool little action camera that I’m hoping to get a hold of in the next couple of weeks, through Adorama.  Adorama collaborated with a Kickstarter campaign from a Chinese company that wanted to produce something about the size of a GoPro except full HD and with a Micro Four Thirds sensor and MFT mount, which they did.  It’s the Z Camera E1, and it’s selling for about $600.  Adorama actually put money into that development through Kickstarter.  Now, wearing my journalistic hat I did try to enquire exactly how much money they did invest, but that amount is certainly not going to be revealed to me, certainly so far.  But the fact is that we’re now seeing vendors who are an active part of development, and to me that’s a significant trend right now.  I mean when you look at the plethora of product, both hardware and software, that came out in 2015, it’s almost very logical that value added resellers know what their customers want, recognize an interesting product, or go about and develop an interesting product with a collaborating manufacturer if nobody else is manufacturing it.  So that, to me, is a significant trend.  Maybe changing gears for a moment, another significant trend is the movement toward mirrorless cameras now, away from the DLSRs.  Indeed, you’re still seeing 7D’s out there and 5D’s shooting video, but more and more something like a GH4 is becoming a real darling of a lot of people.  Sony’s introduction this past year of both the A7R mark 2, and the A7S mark 2, is a whole new dimension right now in the mirrorless cameras, because here we have full frame cameras that can also scale down to APSC size sensor, depending upon the lens.  They are things that are very portable and, in the case of the A7S mark 2 can practically see in the dark.  So we’re seeing that new kind of trend right now with the mirrorless cameras, and alas, I love them, and they’re a sponsor of my Mopictive user group, but we’re still in the situation with poor Black Magic where they can announce at NAB 2015 and still can’t deliver by December 2015.  That’s a shame, because I love the product and what they do, but the ambitious delivery schedules are alienating a number of users, I’m afraid.

Larry Jordan:  Now, are you seeing that camera prices are holding stable, or is there a race for the bottom in terms of the low end?  Is the high end able to even survive these days?

Ned Soltz: I think there’s an interesting market segmentation going on right now, and it’s not just in cameras; it’s in cameras, it’s in accessories, it’s in lighting.  A good example of that, by the way, is Red, because Red, always assuming we’re going to be holding with Red, the announcement this year of both the Raven for the sub-$10,000 market, and the Scarlet-W for the sub-$20,000 market means that, I think, that’s where a great deal of the action is.  There’s probably action in the high end, but I doubt that owner operators are spending the kind of money that they used to spend on buying these high end cameras; they’re going the rental house route.

Larry Jordan:  Yes, the trend is that cameras are obsoleting so quickly you’ll never get your money back if you buy a $20,000 or $30,000 camera; it’s dead before you get your money out.

Ned Soltz:  Oh, absolutely.  For example, what I’m shooting on my Sony FS7, which is a $10,000 camera, let us say, is the equivalent of what I could shoot on $20,000 cameras or more just because of some of the feature sets that Sony puts into that.  So I can make money on that lower end camera.  I can’t make money in my business, if I’m putting $30,000, $40,000, $50,000 into a camera, that’s an absolute impossibility for not that much of a significant return for the kind of work that I do.

Larry Jordan:  Are you seeing any new significant codecs showing up, or are we stabilized in the world of codecs?

Ned Soltz:  Well, we’re seeing more and more of the AVC variant of codecs.  Sony, of course, with its XAVC can now, with the introduction of the C300 mark 2, an XFAVC.  So we’re seeing more and more of the movement towards these AVC codecs in a whole variety of cameras and a whole variety of price ranges.  I wish manufacturers, though, would somehow figure out a way to license and ship Cineform which has been around for a long time and it’s a wonderful codec, wonderfully compact, and I still think has a definite place in the world.  I wish we’d see more of that but, on the other hand, camera manufacturers and everybody else may be introducing codecs based on AVC because they’re efficient to shoot in, but everybody ultimately wants to go to Pro Res, by and large.

Larry Jordan:  My understanding is one of the problems with codecs is the chip that’s used inside the camera has a data rate limitation of around ten megabytes a second, which means that you can’t use some of the high end codecs like ProRes or Cineform, because the chip can’t record the data fast enough.

Ned Soltz:  That is certainly the case in some levels of camera, for sure.

Larry Jordan:  Well, that also would make it cheaper to make the camera, because you don’t have to have that high a bandwidth inside it too.

Ned Soltz:  Right, right.  That’s a factor.

Larry Jordan:  Ned, what I’d like to do is bring you back next week, and New Year’s Eve try to stop your celebrating for just a moment and let’s take a look forward at what the trends of this year mean for what we can expect next year.  Can I bring you back then?

Ned Soltz:  You can bring me back, and I won’t pop the bottle of champagne until after we talk, and that way I’ll be clear!

Larry Jordan:  And Ned, for people that want to keep track of what you’re writing, where can they go on the web?

Ned Soltz:  The easiest place right now is www.creativeplanetnetworks.com.

Larry Jordan:  That’s creativeplanetnetworks.com, and a contributing editor for that network and Digital Video Magazine is Ned Soltz.  Ned, thanks for joining us today.

Ned Soltz:  Thank you, Larry.

Larry Jordan:  In his current role as director of technology at Key Code Media, Michael Kammes consultants on the latest in technology and best practices in the digital communication space.  Also, in his spare time, he creates a new series of web videos called Five Things, and basically lives and breathes technology.  Hello, Michael, welcome back!

Michael Kammes: Thank you very much, Larry, good to see you.

Larry Jordan:  A very merry Christmas Eve!  Before I forget to wish you the happiest of holidays.

Michael Kammes:  And to you and your team as well.  Thank you very much.

Larry Jordan:  We’re devoting tonight’s show to a look back at 2015, and let’s start with the broadest of all questions.  What are some of the media trends that caught your eye?

Michael Kammes:  I wish I could say that trends were sexy, and they were really interesting and shiny, but it’s been asset management, believe it or not.  It’s not the most exciting thing…

Larry Jordan: Michael!  Asset management?  I’m supposed to stay awake for asset management?

Michael Kammes:  It’s a dirty phrase, I know.  I’d like to call it automation, because at the end of the day that’s what it does.  It helps to streamline a lot of the things that assistant editors are doing and a lot of loggers are doing and make data accessible, and then be able to automate transcoding or archiving, things that just take up your time during the day that could be used to create content instead of organizing and finding it.

Larry Jordan:  Now, why is asset management, after struggling for visibility for years, suddenly starting to wake up this year?

Michael Kammes:  People aren’t deleting media!  People are using less cameras and people aren’t deleting things.  So the ability to find all this content, and not just find it but be able to store and then do something with it after the project’s over, that’s become an increasingly large responsibility, and facilities just don’t have someone to dedicate to that.

Larry Jordan:  Okay, so we’ve got asset management, which really is partly hardware but mostly software, that has been something that caught your attention.  What other trends have you spotted?

Michael Kammes:  I think we discussed this a little bit last year, and we definitely saw an uptake this year, and that’s not only the asset management portion but also remote editing.  You know, we talked about the Avid Everywhere, and the Interplay portion.  We talked about the Adobe Anywhere scenario.  We’ve seen technologies like Teradici really pick up steam, and so the ability to edit outside the confines of your four walls has really garnered a lot of interest.

Larry Jordan:  Has it been that the interest is caused by remote editing with storing media in one spot and editors in another, or is it the collaboration aspect that’s got people excited?

Michael Kammes:  It’s mainly the collaboration aspect, and we also find smaller boutiques don’t want to have 50,000 square feet for editors.  They want to be able to have a smaller footprint, to be lean and mean, and be able to sub out work when they need it.  Of course, the conversation always goes to well, are you just subbing out to less expensive labor overseas or elsewhere? But more than often that not we’re finding that no, we just have good talent locally that we feel hey, let them create in their own environment as opposed to being in a traditional box or an edit room, which is a square with, you know, no excitement.  So, being able to do it in your own space has a lot of attention.

Larry Jordan:  Well, also that makes it a lot easier to do scaling, where you’ve got a project where you need ten editors and you need to scale down to two or up to 20.  If you don’t have to worry about office space for all of them it makes scaling a lot easier, too.

Michael Kammes:  That makes complete sense.  We’re also finding folks who are going out and shooting overseas or in other States.  They can now start cutting almost immediately, with some caveats, but be able to edit a lot quicker than waiting for the dailies to get back to home base and waiting for that whole process to start.

Larry Jordan:  How about trends in hardware?  Any hardware suddenly lighting up in ways that they haven’t before?

Michael Kammes:  We’re seeing a lot more stuff from manufacturers supporting VMs, and while that isn’t fantastic…

Larry Jordan:  Define VM, what’s a VM?

Michael Kammes:  VM is what they call a virtual machine, and it’s the ability to run a Linux or Windows OS on a larger machine that can host multiple VMs.  So instead of having one computer dedicated to one user, we now can have one computer operating as a central hub for multiple OS’s.

Larry Jordan:  That strikes me as like the mini and the mainframe computers of 30 years ago, where we simply had a dumb terminal accessing a screen that was connected to the computer, that did the computing.  Are we going back to that?

Michael Kammes:  I love that you brought that up, because when I start bringing up the concept of a mainframe topology the younger end users’ eyes glaze over, like they have no idea what I’m talking about!  We are going back to that to some extent.  Obviously, with the previously mentioned remote editing, that’s a very much mainframe topology, and doing centralized hosting of software and being able to have that go out to dumb terminals, that’s obviously a part of that.  Now, we’re not seeing it as much on the creative end, but we are seeing it on the server end.  A lot of facilities who are running databases, who are running Avid, etcetera, those are now supported inside VMs, which makes management a heck of a lot easier.

Larry Jordan:  Alright, well you’ve touched on the other aspect and we’ve looked at hardware trends, how about software?  What’s happening in software that’s caught your eye?

Michael Kammes:  The race to zero.  Obviously the price of software, the bottom has just fallen out of it.  Even if we look at some of the juggernauts like Autodesk, right, who have always had very high tier pricing, even those prices have dropped.  If we look at things like Resolve, right, the base version is free!  The other manufacturers, Apple aside, have gone to monthly fees instead of several thousand dollar flat fee buyouts.  So we’re seeing the price of entry is a lot lower, which means a lot more people can create.

Larry Jordan:  I think one of the trends that’s impressed me, to pick up on that pricing, is the success of subscriptions, of software rental.  While there’s a lot of users that are concerned about it, from the developers’ point of view a steady cash flow has a very, very pleasant sound to it.  It’s not just Adobe, but I’ve seen it throughout the creative space.  We’re seeing more and more companies are pushing subscriptions.  Are you seeing the same thing, or am I misunderstanding what’s going on?

Michael Kammes:  No, it’s amazing, the Pied Piper mentality.  We had Apple several years ago who did the “Let’s sell a lot cheap”, and they made a boatload.  So we had Adobe a couple of years ago say the same thing: look, we’re going to do a monthly fee.  And then who followed suit?  Autodesk did it, Avid did it.  To Avid’s credit, I find that they kind of capitalized on the areas that Adobe didn’t with offering flexibility in terms of perpetual yearly, monthly, etcetera, whereas Adobe just said no, it’s monthly and deal with it!  We’ve seen a lot of companies move to that methodology because Adobe had success with it.

Larry Jordan:  One of the strengths you’ve got is a much greater understanding of Avid than I do.  How is Avid doing as a company?  Because for a while there it was having some problems.  Are they coming back?

Michael Kammes:  We’re very excited about Avid Interplay and Everywhere becoming more adopted within the industry, and with that I think there’ll be an influx of excitement into the company.  They obviously released a new IO this year, which they branded with Black Magic, which we all were kind of excited about.  Of course, Media Composer 8.3 and 8.4 were released this year and have 4K, so that kind of rounds that out, the feature set that we’ve been looking for from Avid.  So I think we’re pretty optimistic.  As it is, with every NLE, every year, it’s always a crap shoot, but we’re definitely excited about what’s going to happen.

Larry Jordan:  Well, thinking about what’s going to happen leads me to what’s going to happen next.  In less than a week, it’s going to be New Year, so what I’d like to do is invite you back next week to give us your sense of where the future’s taking us and what we can look forward to in 2016.  Does that work for you?

Michael Kammes: I would love to.  I always have acronyms to share with you!

Larry Jordan:  Michael, for people that want to keep track of what you’re thinking and doing, where can they go on the web?

Michael Kammes:  A couple of different places.  You can go to michaelkammes.com.  You can also follow me on Twitter, @MichaelKammes, or my aforementioned series, Fivethingsseries.com.

Larry Jordan:  Michael himself is the person we’re talking to and, Michael, I look forward to talking to you next week.  Thanks for joining us today.

Michael Kammes: Thanks a lot, Larry.

Larry Jordan:  Still to come on The Buzz…

The folks at Black Magic Design keep shaking up the industry.  The new DaVinci Resolve 12 could be all the video editor you need.  DaVinci Resolve 12 combines professional non-linear video editing with the world’s most advanced color corrector.  So now you can edit, color correct, finish and deliver all from one system.  The brand new Black Magic Video Assist is a high resolution, professional monitor and recorder that allows you to see a full pixel 1080 image large enough so you can focus a DSLR camera accurately.  And the new Ursa mini cameras provide stunning quality with a 4.6K sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range, compact, lightweight, and built from advanced magnesium alloy.  When it comes to state of the art technology, look first at Black Magic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan:  Larry O’Connor founded Other World computing, which is also called OWC, in 1988.  Their website, which you may know better than their company name, is macsales.com.  OWC is both a reseller and a developer, supporting all things Mac for more than 25 years, and it’s wearing the developer hat that we want to talk with Larry today.  Hello, Larry!  Welcome back.

Larry O’Connor: Hey, thanks for having me, Larry!

Larry Jordan:  A very merry Christmas Eve to you,

Larry O’Connor:  A merry Christmas to you and all yours, you know.  Happy New Year, too.

Larry Jordan:  Well, now we’re going to have you on the New Year’s show as well, so let us not anticipate too widely here.  Anyway, we’re devoting tonight’s show to look back at 2015.  What are some of the trends that caught your eye this last year?

Larry O’Connor:  A wider adoption, substantial in what highly capable creative folks have been able to do with technology and their use of technology, and their dependence on the technology in the stores and such to do more.  Talking about that dependence, though, easier use to get the job done.  I mean better solutions that, you know, let people focus on what they’re best at and where their time should be focused.

Larry Jordan:  So the principle advantage trend for 2015 sounds like it’s workflow to you, doing things more efficiently?

Larry O’Connor:  I would say yes.  There’s bigger, higher capacity drives, arrays that offer a better plug and play capability.  You know, less techno work, but not by any means as easy as everybody would love it to be, but the technology is becoming less of a hindrance and more of an enabling factor than ever before.  Higher capacity drives certainly make a big difference in people’s workflow.

Larry Jordan:  Thinking about storage for just a second, we’ve seen that the storage capacities have significantly increased over the last year, but are you seeing anything new in storage evolve over the last year, or has it just been evolutionary growth?

Larry O’Connor:  I call it revolutionary and evolutionary at the same time but, you know, one thing that has trended, certainly, and I may be biased here, is the emergence of Thunderbolt, especially Thunderbolt 2.  You have different kinds of storage technologies which now work really well with that extra bandwidth, and provide exceptionally improved flexibility to those that need different kinds of storage solutions.  So it’s subtle yet, and easily taken for granted, but it’s really more than just an evolution and, of course, solid state is playing into the equation.  In good balance, it’s not the be all, end all.  However, hybridized and utilized in concert with the right platter storage, there’s amazingly effective solutions today, with exceptional flexibility that really weren’t possible just a couple of years ago, and certainly not in the budget range that’s within reach of so many.

Larry Jordan:  I was just reading a couple of days ago that Western Digital announced a brand new ten terabyte hard drive.  I mean the amount of storage that we’re able to squeeze onto a traditional spinning media disk just is stunning to me.  I could never have imagined we’d have gotten that much capacity out of a single drive.  Are you seeing that trend is continuing, or are we starting to reach the top on what we can put on spinning media?

Larry O’Connor:  You know, there’s always limits in today’s technology, but today’s technology is substantially evolved compared to the same arguments that were made five, six or even seven years ago with spinning platter drives.  In terms of where things are going, from what I understand and the technologies that are currently emerging, we’re going to continue to see higher and higher densities in the spinners, and we’re not yet done with where that platform can go.  Consider it a platform, because the technology inside a hard drive on a lot of levels is a lot different than what it was just a few years ago.  Enabling the high densities is really revolutionary steps and we continue to march forward.

Larry Jordan:  Another thing that you mentioned happened over the last year is SSD’s.  We’re seeing SSD prices start to drop, but we’re not seeing lots and lots of additional capacity on SSD’s.  Are SSD’s stuck on a plateau?

Larry O’Connor:  No, I don’t believe so.  As you get into higher densities then there’s different challenges that have to be overcome, and you can put out now (pardon my pun) flashy, high capacity products, but there’s a lot more to it, and just like hard drives across time, there are some big steps yet to be made to adjust for the leaps in capacity and ensuring the longevity of the data, the media, is managed and maintained.  I don’t think we’re at a plateau; I think we’re going to see some big jumps over the next couple of years in flash, but we’ll see where we’re at in three or four years in terms of what technology is around.  This is the thing, I mean you talk about SSD, and some people think memory; they interchange terms.  A lot of people out there will interchange hard drive and SSD.  What we’re using SSD’s for in a few years will be very different than what we’re using today.  In fact, even the core technology, the media, I should say the chips, the kind of technology that we store data with is going to be very different, no different than if you look at how a hard recorder was media five or six years ago.  They’re still hard drives to the world, but they’re really a very different beast inside at a technical level.  Regardless of using a chip is still effectively silicon, and a hard drive is made up of spinning platters, but those platters are a lot different than what they had been.  The current technology definitely has a furious … what’s really going to be in a flash or a solid state drive in a few years, or what we call a solid state drive.  I think it’s going to evolve significantly.

Larry Jordan:  As you look at the other hardware that you sell through your website, have you noticed, if we exclude storage, any other hardware trends that suddenly caught fire last year that surprised you?

Larry O’Connor:  I can’t say that anything’s been super surprising, in the sense that products that add external functionality have taken off like wildfire, and that’s because the trend in general has been to take away ports and reduce built-in functionality.  Anything that gives you more capabilities has taken off, but that’s also something that is now, to a certain degree, custom tailored.  I mean you buy the external add-ons, the external capability adders that fit your needs as opposed to getting a solution that already has everything in the box for everybody.  You’re buying things that are just for you.  That’s going to get better as the bandwidth on these systems, you know, with Thunderbolt 3 in the future, that really starts to become a real practical game plan.  With Thunderbolt and Thunderbolt 2, others, I really wish there was a PCIE slot in some of these systems to unlock everything but, as we move forward, it’s going to be easier and easier just to plug in what you need.

Larry Jordan:  Well, what I’d like to do, Larry, is to invite back next week on our New Year’s Eve show and talk about how we can take the trends that developed in 2015 and spot what the trends are for 2016.  Can we invite you back next week?

Larry O’Connor:  I’d love to be back, absolutely, and wish you a proper happy New Year.

Larry Jordan:  And Larry, for people who want to keep track of what you and your company is doing, where can they go on the web?

Larry O’Connor:  They can visit us at owcdigital.com, and macsales.com.

Larry Jordan:  And Larry O’Connor is the founder of OWC and Larry, thanks for joining us today.

Larry O’Connor:  Hey, thank you, Larry for having me, and have a merry Christmas!

Larry Jordan:  Jonathan Handel is an entertainment and technology attorney of counsel at Troy Gould in Los Angeles.  He’s also the contributing editor on entertainment labor issues for the Hollywood Reporter and, best of all, he’s a regular here on The Buzz.  Hello, Jonathan, welcome back!

Jonathan Handel:  Larry, it’s a pleasure to be back with you.

Larry Jordan:  And a very merry Christmas Eve to you.

Jonathan Handel:  Merry Christmas Eve and happy holidays to you!

Larry Jordan:  Thank you.  We are devoting tonight’s show to a look back at 2015, and I thought I’d ask you what are some of the trends this year that caught your eye.

Jonathan Handel:  Well, there were trends both in Hollywood and nationally, when it came to labor.  In Hollywood, I think the biggest development really the SAG-AFTRA elections.  We saw a frustration among the membership, among other reasons because of the fact that the health plans have not yet merged.  As you recall, SAG and AFTRA merged back in 2012, but it’s been three years and the health plans, as well as the pension plans, are still separate.  Now, those are separate organizations legally from the union but, nonetheless, people were hoping to see somewhat more progress, and it was one of the bases, though not the only basis, on which the merger was sold.  So what we see now is a Screen Actors Guild, SAG-AFTRA, with something of a split in the leadership between the folks who were pro-merger, the ‘unite for strength’ faction, they’re called, and the folks who initially had been anti-merger, ‘membership first’.  Where that’s going to lead, we don’t yet know.

Larry Jordan:  Well, are you seeing this as foot dragging, or just that the two plans are so complex it’s hard to merge them?

Jonathan Handel:  Well, it’s difficult to tell.  What you have to remember is that the board of directors for the pension and health plan is composed 50% of union representatives and 50% of management representatives.  There is some possibility that what management is trying to do is make merger of the health plans a bargaining issue so that, in the next round of negotiation, which will be starting next fall, the union, if it wants to see those plans merged, is going to have to give up something in return.  That’s not really a proper thing to do, if that is what’s being done, because when they sit on that board, both the union members and management members are supposed to be fiduciaries, or trustees, representing the participants in the plan, the people that are receiving health insurance and receiving pensions or qualifying for pensions.  But whether that’s what’s actually going on, we don’t know.  It is important to know, it is not wholly within the union’s power to simply snap a finger and say okay, now we’re merging.

Larry Jordan:  One of the other issues that I remember from our conversations early in the year was on-set safety, and safety in general.  Has that still developed into a hot button, or has that just sort of subsided now that nobody’s getting hurt recently?

Jonathan Handel:  Well, sadly, it’s sort of subsided now but people are still getting hurt somewhat.  I’m recalling that there were, I believe, some injuries or some deaths, I believe, in a helicopter crash involving a production in South America just recently.  You know, it’s simply unfortunately not the case that no-one gets hurt on a regular basis in our industry; it’s a dangerous business at times.  I’d say that, you know, without having my fingers literally on the pulse of the crew from day to day, I’d say that it has, like all things, subsided to some extent, now that it’s no longer right in people’s viewfinders, as it were.  But I hope there’s been some lasting effect. I’d like to believe that there has been, as a result of the Slates for Sarah movement and other movements related to safety.

Larry Jordan:  Your principal area of coverage is the guilds inside Hollywood, but another key trend has been flights of film out of Hollywood into other States, and even other countries, due to tax incentives and others.  Are you seeing that trend continuing, or is it about the same, or what’s your take on that?

Jonathan Handel:  Well, it is continuing.  You know, the pieces always get shuffled a little bit.  For one thing, we have seen some production return to California, and to the Los Angeles area in particular, as a result of the California incentives that were increased, finally, after a lot of lobbying.  We also saw North Carolina, I believe, end their inventive program, so there’s been some shift.  But there is an awful lot of production that goes on overseas and you know, in other States, and in addition there is an increase in local production being done in local languages overseas.  So it’s a very globalized business and, of course, when you talk about things like safety, like union coverage, union policies, things of that sort, that makes it a little more complex, because of the geographically dispersed nature of the business.

Larry Jordan:  That was a good point.  I remember reading just a couple of weeks ago there was an article on how Warner Brothers is developing films for local markets outside the U.S.  Russia came first to mind, in terms of the article.  This idea of developing films for international distribution that doesn’t even hit the States is relatively new, it seems to me.

Jonathan Handel:  Well, it’s growing.  I mean there have been little bits and pieces of it for some time, I think, but I think finally the studios are recognizing that is going to be potentially a significant part, at least in some territories, of their business.  So it certainly is becoming more prominent, that’s right.

Larry Jordan:  Last question before we run out of time is about crew sizes.  With the miniaturization of hardware and things becoming more and more automated, are crew sizes, especially on mid-sized films, which is the majority of what Hollywood is turning out, getting smaller or are roughly the same number of people being employed?

Jonathan Handel:  Well, you know, my sense is that the crew sizes didn’t get smaller, the pictures got bigger, so to speak!  You know, we really are looking at a Hollywood business that focuses a lot on [tent poles], and of course you’ve got enormous crew sizes there.  I’m not aware of any significant shrinkage in crew sizes.  I may not be 100% right on that, and our viewers may have some more input than I do, but I’m not aware of a huge change.

Larry Jordan:  Jonathan, are there other trends that you’ve noticed this last year that we need to pay attention to?

Jonathan Handel:  Yes.  The devolution of power when it comes to labor and employment relations from Congress, which has been relatively inactive, particularly with the difference in political control between Congress and, of course, the Presidency, to state and local regulators.  So you see States and cities raising the minimum wage.  You see cities, even, such as Seattle, trying to come up with ways to unionize part-time workers like workers on Uber; things that, at one point in time might have been matters for Congress, but in today’s world are really not being addressed federally.

Larry Jordan:  For people that want to keep track of your thought and your writing, where can they go to learn more on the web?

Jonathan Handel:  Two places, jhandel.com, and thrlabor.com.

Larry Jordan:  And the jhandel himself, Jonathan Handel of counsel at Troy Gould and the entertainment labor reporter for the Hollywood Reporter.  Jonathan, as always it’s fun visiting.  Can we invite you back next week to take a look at trends to look forward to in 2016?

Jonathan Handel:  I’d be pleased to come back, thank you.

Larry Jordan:  We’ll see you then.  Jonathan, thank you so much.

Larry Jordan:  I want to invite you to become a member of our video training library.  Our training library is unique in the industry.  It includes more than 1400 in-depth movies, each accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week.  Every movie in our library can be streamed to any internet connected device, and it includes production and post production, hardware, software and techniques.  It features current and past software releases for both Apple and Adobe and, unlike YouTube, all our training is complete.  And unlike other websites, we focus exclusively on media production and post production.  Best of all, our memberships are affordable, starting at only $19.99 per month.  Focused, in-depth, accessible and complete, this is the training that you need to solve problems, master new software and expand your business.  I invite you to become a member today.  Thanks.

Larry Jordan:  It’s time for a Buzz Flashback.  Five years ago today.

Unknown male:  First of all, very different than it was back in the day when record labels were … because the huge growth in the last few years has been that of independently produced and independently released product in a wide variety of different musical styles.  We’re seeing very big changes in the way that artists connect with their fans, and the way fans find artists.

Larry Jordan:  This was a Buzz Flashback.

Larry Jordan:  I want to thank our guests for this week, and remind you that they’ll all be back next week, with their thoughts as they look ahead to 2016: Randi Altman, Philip Hodgetts, Michael Kammes, Larry O’Connor, Ned Soltz, Jonathan Handel and, as always, Mike Horton.  There’s a lot of history in our industry, and it’s all posted to our website at digitalproductionbuzz.com.  Here, you’ll find thousands of interviews all online and all available to you today.  Please sign up for our free weekly show newsletter.

Larry Jordan:  Talk with us on Twitter @DPBuzz, and Facebook at digitalproductionbuzz.com.  Our theme music is composed by Nathan Dugie Turner, with additional music provided by smartsound.com. Text transcripts from Take 1 Transcription.  Visit take1.tv to learn how they can help you.  Our producer is Cirina Catania; our engineering team is led by Megan Paulos, and includes Ed Golya, Hannah Dean, Keegan Guy, Lindsay Loubert, James Miller and Brianna Murphy.

Larry Jordan:  The holidays are a time of hope and celebration, a chance to look back at the past, appreciate what we have in the present and look forward in anticipation to the future.  All of us at The Buzz are honored to be a part of your life.  Have yourself a very merry Christmas.  On behalf of Mike Horton, my name is Larry Jordan, and thanks for joining us for The Digital Production Buzz.

Announcer #1:  The Digital Production Buzz was brought to you by Other World Computing, providing quality hardware solutions and extensive technical support to the worldwide computer industry since 1988; and by Black Magic Design, creating revolutionary solutions for film, post production and television.

Larry Jordan:  If you’d like to see more videos like this one, please subscribe to our YouTube channel.  To stay connected and receive updates from The Buzz, sign up for our free weekly newsletter now, or you can learn more about us on our website.  And thanks for watching The Digital Production Buzz.

Digital Production Buzz – December 24, 2015

Join Larry Jordan and Mike Horton as they talk with Philip Hodgetts, Ned Soltz, Michael Kammes, Larry O’Connor, and Jonathan Handel.

  • Technology Trends of 2015
  • Key Camera Technologies from 2015
  • Workflow Trends from 2015
  • Storage Trends from 2015
  • A Look Back at Labor in 2015
  • Randi’s Perspective: Key News Trends for 2015

View Show Transcript

Watch the Full Episode


Buzz on YouTubeTranscript

Listen to the Full Episode


Buzz on iTunesTranscript

Guests this Week

Philip Hodgetts
Philip Hodgetts, President, Lumberjack System
It’s Christmas Eve, which gives The Buzz a chance to look back at key trends and technology from 2015. To start our round-table, Philip Hodgetts, CEO of Intelligent Assistance and noted industry technology guru, shares his perspective on technology trends for 2015.
Ned Soltz
Ned Soltz, Contributing Editor, Digital Video Magazine, Ned Soltz Inc.
Ned Soltz, contributing editor for Digital Video magazine, continues the Buzz roundtable with his thoughts on key camera technologies from 2015.
Michael Kammes
Michael Kammes, Director, Technology Key Code Media
Michael Kammes, Director of Technology for KeyCode Media, discusses the workflow trends he found interesting from 2015.
Larry O'Connor
Larry O’Connor, President & Founder, Other World Computing
Storage underwent a transformation in terms of capacity this year. Larry O’Connor, founder and CEO of Other World Computing, contributes his perspective on key storage trends from 2015.
Jonathan Handel
Jonathan Handel, Entertainment/Technology Attorney & Labor Reporter, TroyGould and The Hollywood Reporter
Jonathan Handel is an entertainment and technology attorney, Of Counsel, at TroyGould in Los Angeles. He is also the contributing editor on entertainment labor issues for The Hollywood Reporter. This week, Jonathan discusses key labor issues and trends from 2015.

Transcript: Digital Production Buzz – December 17, 2015

Digital Production Buzz

December 17, 2015

[Transcripts provided by Take 1 Transcription]

(Click here to listen to this show.)

HOSTS
Larry Jordan
Mike Horton

SEGMENTS
Randi Altman’s Perspective
Tech Talk with Larry Jordan
BuZZ Flashback: Jessica Sitomer

GUESTS
Joseph Tully , Founder, Tully & Weiss Criminal Lawyers
Kendall Eckman, Regional Manager, Western North America, Blackmagic Design
Lynette Kent, Author, Artist, Educator, Photographer
===

Larry Jordan: Last week, a police helicopter had to abort a stolen car chase in the San Francisco Bay area town of Martinez. Why? They were on a collision course with a drone gone rogue. Tonight on The Buzz, we talk with the pilot of that drone and his lawyer about the perils of flying drones and what you must know to protect yourself.

Larry Jordan: Next, how do you pick the right camera for your project? And as a hint, it isn’t necessarily the camera that you own. Kendall Eckman, the Regional Manager for Western North America for Blackmagic Design, explains what key camera specs mean and how to find the right camera for your next film.

Larry Jordan: Next, Lynette Kent is a professional photographer who travels the world recording amazing landscapes. She’s also an unconventional computer guru and one of the leaders of the Adobe Technology Exchange of Southern California. Tonight, she talks about traveling with Profoto gear, taking pictures and the art of being a pro.

Larry Jordan: All this plus Tech Talk, a Buzz Flashback and Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News. The Buzz starts now.

Announcer #1: Tonight’s Digital Production Buzz is brought to you by Other World Computing at macsales.com; and by Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Announcer #2: Since the dawn of digital filmmaking… Authoritative…one show serves a worldwide network of media professionals… Current…uniting industry experts… Production…filmmakers… Post production…and content creators around the planet. Distribution. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now.

Larry Jordan: And welcome to the Digital Production Buzz, the world’s longest running podcast for the creative content industry covering media production, post production and marketing around the world. Our co-host, Mike Horton, has decided to hang out at home. Can you believe this? I mean, hello, Mike, are you there?

Mike Horton: Yes, I’ve got more important things to do. I’m hanging out at home there, Larry. That’s pretty much the bottom line.

Larry Jordan: I was thinking, we’re about a week away from Christmas. Are your holiday decorations up?

Mike Horton: Well, yes. Now, do you do Christmas trees?

Larry Jordan: Yes we do.

Mike Horton: Ok, well I do a Christmas tree and I do a Christmas tree probably like most people, it goes up about three weeks before Christmas, I don’t know why everybody does that, or two weeks before Christmas. Most sane people do it the night before.

Larry Jordan: Well, no-one has ever accused you of sanity.

Mike Horton: No, so we do it, like, three weeks before so we can panic during the entire Christmas season and this year we decided, for some silly reason, to put it right in front of the fireplace.

Larry Jordan: Ok. That strikes me as a real problem.

Mike Horton: And, of course, we don’t have a fire this year because we’re just not going to put a fire because the Christmas tree’s right in front of the fireplace. No, this is true. We usually put it out in the living room and we’ve never used the living room since we moved into this place 30 years ago. In fact, all we do is pass it going through the front door and say, “Hi, living room,” so we put it in the family room, but the only place in the family room is to put it in front of the fireplace.

Larry Jordan: But that means you can’t have a fire.

Mike Horton: No, and we still panic about the whole dryness thing and the Christmas tree exploding. You hear of all these exploding Christmas trees, I don’t know how that happens, but next year for sure – we keep saying that – let’s just put it up the night before and then take it down the day after.

Larry Jordan: You know, I had no idea there was so much trauma associated with your Christmas tree.

Mike Horton: And there’s a lot of science too, so there you go. Going into the garage and we’ve got five containers of Christmas decorations and all these wonderful Christmas ornaments that go back 40 years to the little babies and all that other stuff and that sort of thing is really, really fun to do.

Larry Jordan: Oh, it truly is.

Mike Horton: But it is a lot of work, especially putting lights on a Christmas tree. Who does that, you?

Larry Jordan: Oh yes, about 17 strings of lights and our ornaments go back 80 years, so I know exactly what you mean.

Mike Horton: And that’s, of course, more trauma because it usually says do not attach more than four strings together, and it’s always 17 strings.

Larry Jordan: I’ve never, ever paid attention to that.

Mike Horton: Yes, that’s a good thing.

Larry Jordan: So I’m going to go back home and discover the smoking remains of my house after today’s show is over.

Mike Horton: It will, it’ll explode.

Larry Jordan: We’ve got a great show today and I’m glad to at least say hi to you at the beginning of it because we’re going to be talking with a guy that was flying a drone, lost control of the drone, the drone chased off a police helicopter causing some air traffic control issues and got arrested by the police for flying a drone and causing all kinds of chaos. So we’re going to find out what the laws about drones are, so I’m looking forward to our first guest.

Mike Horton: Yes, they’re changing all the time, and there are so many idiotic and confusing laws out there right now. And now, of course, if you’ve got a drone, you’ve got to register it.

Larry Jordan: That’s very true, starting December 21st. Michael, thank you, we’re going to see you next week on our Christmas Eve show, so thanks for joining us today.

Mike Horton: Great, and happy holidays and I don’t have to wish you a Merry Christmas yet, but I will.

Larry Jordan: Not yet. We’re going to do that next week. By the way, I want to remind you to subscribe to our free weekly show newsletter at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Every issue every week gives you an inside look at both The Buzz and industry, plus quick links to all the different segments on the show. Best of all, every issue is free.

Larry Jordan: I’ll be back with Owen Ouywang and Joseph Tully right after Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News.

Larry Jordan: This is Randi Altman’s Perspective.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman has been writing about our industry for more than 20 years. In fact, she’s the editor in chief of her own website at postperspective.com. Hello, Randi, welcome back.

Randi Altman: Hi, Larry. How are you?

Larry Jordan: It’s about a week until Christmas, the excitement around here is just palpable and, I can imagine, even more crazy at your place, so before we get hung up on the holidays, what’s been happening this week?

Randi Altman: Well, earlier in the week I was having some fun watching social media blow up about this whole – and I’m sure you’re aware of it – Beats by Dre, which is owned by Apple, how they had this ‘Help Wanted’ Ad for a non-Final Cut Pro editor, they wanted some Avid editors, so I had a really good time reading all the comments on all the different social media platforms and what I’ve discovered is it’s like editing wars.

Randi Altman: It’s crazy. People latch onto a particular editing system and they hold on tight and there are others who are just like, “You know what? Whatever works for the job,” No-one ever commented, “Oh, that was edited in a great way on that system in the theater or watching on their TV screen,” so it’s been very interesting. Then a couple of Final Cut Pro editors were like, “Good, more work for me. You guys do what you’ve got to do and I’ll take those jobs,” so it’s been pretty interesting.

Randi Altman: I think it goes throughout the industry in terms of even the professional editors, because I’ve read some interviews with Kirk Baxter, who admittedly is not overly technical when it comes to his editing system, he relies on his assistant editors and he gets creative, and that’s what he likes. So he’s not necessarily platform agnostic but he’s willing to work on what works for him.

Larry Jordan: I did some homework on that Beats situation. Beats is a separate company from Apple, it’s not part of Apple HQ, so they’re totally independent. Apple HQ still is full Final Cut 10 but Beats, because it’s a separate entity, it would be as though you were deciding to edit with Premiere or Avid or Final Cut. It affects what you and your company do but it doesn’t affect what Apple does. Also, if you look at the headline, that was definitely written to generate clicks, so it blew up. I got a lot of emails about that one myself. What else have we been seeing going on this week, just before everything shuts down for the holidays?

Randi Altman: Well, RED introduced a new camera. They’ve been spitting them out pretty regularly, haven’t they? It’s the Scarlet-W and it’s part of their Dragon line, so that’s new. Then just getting back to the editing thing for a second, I heard today that Bandido Brothers, so Jacob Rosenberg and those guys, they actually purchased some Avid gear and they’re talking about using Media Composer as well. So a company that had been historically an Adobe based platform is opening itself up to more, so they’re using Avid and Adobe products. I think that that’s how the world is going. I think that you’re going to be using multiple.

Larry Jordan: Well, one of the interesting things you said that I’ve felt for a long time is that all too often we define ourselves in terms of our editing tools as opposed to what we create with those tools. We define ourselves as a Premiere editor, an Avid editor, a Final Cut editor, which is why these flame wars exist, because they challenge our existence as a Final Cut or an Avid person, whereas I think a lot of editors need to define themselves as storytellers and, as you were pointing out, what tool do we need to use to tell the story that needs to be told? That’s something that I don’t think the industry’s ready to shift over to yet. We still want to be hung up on the technology and to find ourselves in terms of the technology not in terms of the results. What do you think?

Randi Altman: I think part of that is true. I do see more people, though, willing to embrace other types of technology and lose the whole technical aspect and just dive into the creative, at least some of the people that I’ve been talking to, so hopefully that will be a trend for the upcoming year.

Larry Jordan: Well, thinking of the upcoming year, I know that you’ve got plenty of stuff to do because your newsletter’s about to publish and I don’t want to interfere with that, but I want to bring you back Christmas Eve and take a look at what trends you’ve spotted for 2015, to look back at the year and give us a high perspective of what you’ve noticed. Can we invite you back then?

Randi Altman: Sure, I’d like that. Thanks.

Larry Jordan: We’ll talk to you next week. Randi Altman is the editor in chief of postperspective.com and you can visit her website at any time for some of the finest interviews in the industry. Randi, thanks for joining us today.

Randi Altman: Thanks, Larry.

Larry Jordan: To read more from Randi Altman, visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: When you’re working with media, one thing is essential – your computer needs peak performance. However, when it comes to upgrading your Mac, there are so many different options to choose from that the process can be confusing. That’s why Other World Computing carries the best upgrades that lets your computer performance and storage grow as your needs grow.

Larry Jordan: Since 1988, OWC has become one of the most trusted names in quality hardware and comprehensive support to the worldwide computer industry. With an extensive online catalog of Mac, iPhone and iPad enhancement products, as well as a dedicated team of knowledgeable experts providing first rate tech support, OWC has everything you need to take your current system to the next level. Whether you need to maximize your system’s memory, add blazing speed or enhance reliability, look no further than the friendly experts at OWC. Learn more by visiting macsales.com today.

Larry Jordan: Last week, a police helicopter had to abort a stolen car chase in the San Francisco Bay area town of Martinez. Why? They were on a collision course with a drone gone rogue launched by a student who’s now in the midst of a police FAA investigation. Tonight, we’re joined by Joseph Tully, founder of the California criminal law firm Tully & Weiss and author of California State of Collusion. He’s consistently named among the top 100 criminal trial lawyers in America and holds a certified criminal law specialist designation by the California Bar Association, an honor held by less than one-tenth of one percent of lawyers. Hello, Joseph, welcome.

Joseph Tully: Good evening. How are you?

Larry Jordan: And joining us as well is Owen Ouywang, the Chinese exchange student who was flying the drone at the time. Hello, Owen, welcome.

Owen Ouywang: Hello. Good evening, how are you?

Larry Jordan: Glad to have you both with us. Owen, I want to start with you and start with something simple – how long have you been flying drones?

Owen Ouywang: I’ve been flying drones since I was really a kid, so I was flying remote control helicopters since I was eight or nine.

Larry Jordan: And tell us what model you were flying and what you were filming when this drone runaway occurred.

Owen Ouywang: The model that I was flying was a DJI Phantom 3 advanced model and I have to clarify that I was not trying to get pictures or videos at the time. I was just trying to fly the drone.

Larry Jordan: So explain the situation. Start at the beginning, what happened?

Owen Ouywang: It was 8.30 or nine in the evening and I took out my drone to have a test flight, so I took it off from the front yard of my house. Then I started to fly the drone in an east direction and then I realized that there is a power line in the direction that I was trying to fly the drone, so I took the drone to the south direction. Then I believe there was some interference between the power line and my joystick and then I lost the signal of the drone. That activated a steer forward function which is a called a return to home function and that raises the altitude to a preset altitude and starts to fly it back and I believe that is where the near collision happened.

Larry Jordan: And the incident, as I understand it, was the drone was about 750 feet in the air, give or take a little bit, and started to interfere with a police helicopter which was in pursuit of a stolen car. Am I hearing that correctly?

Owen Ouywang: Yes, this is what I heard from the news as well.

Larry Jordan: So how did the police connect you with the drone?

Owen Ouywang: After the return to home function activated but the drone itself, the drone started to fly back from where it lost its connection with me. I heard a helicopter flying over my head after the drone got close to me. However, I did not know that was a CHP helicopter until the police officer started to talk to me about it.

Larry Jordan: Well, that’s got to be a scary moment. Joseph, what’s the current law on flying drones and was Owen obeying the law as you understand it?

Joseph Tully: Actually, he was. The scary thing about this situation is that this isn’t a situation where you have somebody who’s uninformed or being negligent or being reckless. Owen is a student pilot, he’s flown six or seven different types of aircraft including a helicopter. Before he flew the drone, he had looked up the FAA guidelines and was doing his best to be safe and fly within those guidelines.

Joseph Tully: To answer your question about the current law on drones, there’s no real law about drones so the situation is very analogous to automobiles. When automobiles first came out, there were no laws about vehicular manslaughter or anything like that and, as a society, we had to develop a body of law around this new technology, and that’s where we’re at now.

Joseph Tully: There could be maybe a battery – if I punch you, that’s a battery, if I throw a baseball at you, that’s a battery, if I flew a drone at you, that would be a battery – or assault with a deadly weapon, something like that. We could use those laws to apply them to this situation. However, we fully cooperated with the police and with the US Department of Transportation. They determined that because this was in return to home function, there is no criminal intent or criminal negligence on Owen’s part and therefore there’s no criminal liability. As I understand it, he’s been cleared of any criminal charges at this point.

Larry Jordan: Now, the one thing that puzzles me is that there’s a 500 feet limit to altitude with a drone and the drone went up to 750 feet. Was this a problem with the manufacturer?

Joseph Tully: It’s a default setting in the drone, so it can be increased and in this instance Owen was in a situation where he’s on a hill, there are other houses on that hill, there are other buildings in the area and there are power lines, so he actually – being safety minded – increased the default so that if it ever did go into the return to home function, it would fly up to a safe height and then return home, so it wouldn’t hit a building or a power line and fall down on somebody and hurt them. Owen knows, being a pilot, that most pilots fly above a thousand feet – is that correct?

Owen Ouywang: Yes.

Joseph Tully: Ok.

Larry Jordan: Well, one of the things I want to point out is that Owen had been very proactive in stating what the problem is, stating what he did, stating how this has come out and is serving as a role model spokesman to say, “Hey, pay attention to this,” so that there’s been no attempt to hide the fact this occurred, so Owen, thank you very much for joining us and explaining this today. I want to make that really clear. But, Joseph, is Owen still responsible for flying the drone, even though the drone has gotten out of his control?

Joseph Tully: That’s a really difficult question and the answer is probably maybe. Again, this is a new field in law. It was in autopilot mode. He lost connection with the drone through no fault of anything that he did. Would it be your fault if your cell phone lost connection with somebody while you were guiding them someplace and they got lost? In this case, the drone lost connection, through no fault of Owen’s, and because it lost connection it went into this return to home safety function.

Larry Jordan: Based upon this, and especially because he interfered with a police helicopter, what charges if any is Owen facing, or what penalties, if any?

Joseph Tully: Right now, he’s been cleared of any criminal liability, so there are no federal charges, there are no state criminal charges. There are guidelines that you’re not supposed to fly within five miles of an airport and there’s an airport nearby, within five miles of where this was, so there may be a penalty with that. But it’s my understanding that there are no clear fines or penalties. Again, there’s no real body of law around drones right now.

Larry Jordan: My understanding is that there is new drone legislation pending. Can you describe what that is?

Joseph Tully: Well, I’ve had a chance to review it very briefly and it seems to be focused on just registration. So any drones between half a pound up to 55 pounds have to be registered with the FAA and if you don’t register you face very stiff civil penalties of up to $27,500 and perhaps some criminal liability as well. But the regulations seem to be dealing with registration itself and not how to fly the drone or flying irresponsibly.

Larry Jordan: We have a live chat going on right now and, Owen, you answered this question earlier but Eric is asking why you were flying the drone if you weren’t filming at the time.

Owen Ouywang: I was just trying to test the flight of the drone. People get a drone, they do not fly it only when they want to film. I was just trying to fly it around. That’s what I wanted to do.

Larry Jordan: Basically practicing.

Owen Ouywang: Yes, exactly.

Joseph Tully: And actually he has a passion for flying. Again, he’s a student pilot, he’s close to getting his license, he flies any kind of aircraft he can and he’s going to school to become an airline mechanic, so he loves flying.

Larry Jordan: Joseph, should drone manufacturers provide a different kind of programming for their drones to help solve this problem? Is this a manufacturing issue? Is this a regulation issue? An airspace issue? Where do you think the boundaries lie?

Joseph Tully: I think there is a technological fix. I think the emerging technology of vehicle to vehicle communication, the internet of things where different objects can talk to each other, should be implemented into drones as a fix to this. Also, when I’m in cruise control in my car, if somebody pulls in front of me, my car will slow down and adjust with the laser assisted cruise control with the radar installed in it. I think the drones having radar or vehicle to vehicle communication would have avoided this incident.

Larry Jordan: Joseph, if you were to give guidance to other drone operators who want to fly their drones responsibly and avoid the kind of problem that Owen’s going through right now, what advice would you give them?

Joseph Tully: First and foremost, I would say that a drone is not a toy, so everybody who gets a drone under the tree at Christmas, don’t wake up and just start flying it right away. Be very responsible with it. Again, Owen’s situation is somebody who’s intelligent, who’s knowledgeable and was trying to do the right thing and yet still ended up in a bad situation which could have been really bad, so I would say treat it extremely safe, go to a waterfront, go to a place where people fly kites, where you can have visual sight with the drone at all times. Stay away from crowds of people and objects, so a nice open, flat area where there aren’t a lot of people would be the place to fly a drone.

Larry Jordan: Another legal question for you, Joseph. What are the liability rulings on drones? If damage is caused, who’s liable?

Joseph Tully: I think we would have to go back to cars or aircraft and use existing law and start applying it by analogy to drones. If I fly a drone through the window of your house and I purposely do that or I negligently do that, then I would be responsible for it. If I’m flying a drone responsibly and you are – I don’t know why somebody would do this – but you’re piloting erratically maybe an airplane or something like that and you hit the drone just because you’re flying erratically, that would be your fault.

Joseph Tully: Then I think there’s probably going to be a big body of law relating to manufacturer’s liability. For instance, had something happened here, as you pointed out, there’s not a clear liability situation. The drone was in autopilot mode, it has been programmed to be safe and yet there’s no vehicle to vehicle communication and there’s no radar installed in the drone where it could have avoided hitting an object, a building, a tree or another flying vehicle.

Larry Jordan: Owen, I can just imagine the stress you’re under and I very much appreciate you coming on this show and explaining the situation, so I hope this gets resolved successfully from your point of view.

Owen Ouywang: Thank you very much.

Larry Jordan: And Joseph, for people who want to learn more about your law practice, which is amazing, what website can they go to?

Joseph Tully: They could go to tully-weiss.com.

Larry Jordan: And Joseph Tully himself is speaking. Joseph and Owen, thanks for joining us today.

Joseph Tully: Thank you very much.

Larry Jordan: The folks at Blackmagic Design keep shaking up the industry. The new DaVinci Resolve 12 could be all the video editor you need. DaVinci Resolve 12 combines professional non-linear video editing with the world’s most advanced color corrector, so now you can edit, color correct, finish and deliver all from one system.

Larry Jordan: The brand new Blackmagic Video Assist is a high resolution professional monitor and recorder that allows you to see a full pixel 1080 image large enough so you can focus a DSLR camera accurately; and the new URSA Mini cameras provide stunning quality with a 4.6K sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range, compact, lightweight and built from advanced magnesium alloy.

Larry Jordan: When it comes to state of the art technology, look first at Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan: Have you ever tried to figure out how to pick the best camera? Or wondered if you were using the right gear on your project? Well, our next guest can help. Kendall Eckman is the Regional Manager for the Western North America section for Blackmagic Design and we invited him here to answer that very question. Hello, Kendall, welcome.

Kendall Eckman: Hi, how are you?

Larry Jordan: To put our conversation into perspective, how would you describe your role with Blackmagic? What do you do?

Kendall Eckman: As you said, I’m the Regional Manager for Western North America, so I handle the territory and I try to oversee pretty much everything that’s going on in there, whether it’s the resellers that sell our products, events, trade shows, even meeting with churches, schools, some of the high end corporations and even the studios.

Larry Jordan: I’m going to give you the question that I get probably three or four times a day and I know no-one has a better answer for this than you do. In fact, you are the world’s leading expert in answering this question. Are you sitting down?

Kendall Eckman: Yes, yes.

Larry Jordan: He said with a panicked look on his face. Here’s the question – what is the best camera?

Kendall Eckman: Well, that would be Blackmagic Design, of course.

Larry Jordan: Well, yes, but that’s the wrong answer as well, you know.

Kendall Eckman: Well, we have a number of cameras, as you know Larry, so for me to pick one out of the eight that we carry, that would all depend on what kind of work you’re doing, probably.

Larry Jordan: Now, that is the right answer. The best camera is not necessarily the camera you own, it’s the camera that’s best for the project. This frustrates the heck out of everybody that sends me this email. They say, “What’s the best camera?” and I say, “It all depends upon what you’re doing,” so let’s spend some time thinking about cameras. Every camera has a ton of specs associated with it. Which specs should we pay attention to? What are the most important?

Kendall Eckman: I’d say the ones at the top of my list would be the format that you want to present everything in, whether you need to go to high quality, you need something like a CinemaDNG RAW if you needed to get it out to RAW, or we have flavors of ProRes, so depending on how much time you want to put on a single card, maybe, and the footage that you’re going to do, you can go all the way down to the low proxy settings or you can go all the way up into HQ on the ProRes.

Kendall Eckman: Then I would say even lens mount, as much as that doesn’t sound like something you would look at. I know a number of people who have come to us at all the different shows and they’ve said, “Oh, I have a number of Canon lenses so I need the EF mount,” or “I’m using PR lenses, so that comes into play,” and now, of course, we’ve got into the B4 and a lot of people have B4 glass laying around so they want to use those B4 lenses, so that might be something that you’d look at also.

Larry Jordan: Is there a quality difference between the different lens mounts?

Kendall Eckman: To a degree. I think that you get into the micro four-thirds and they’re there maybe on the lower scale, but much more inexpensive and reasonable for people to get into the market and start shooting with. And then, of course, you can always do the different mounts on there, you can do different adapters, so you can take a micro four-thirds and you can move to a PL or an EF if you need to.

Larry Jordan: Now, you’re talking the micro four-thirds as the size of the sensor. Does sensor size affect quality or, more importantly, what does the sensor size affect?

Kendall Eckman: From what I understand, the larger the sensor – you take a Super 35, you’re going to have a shallower depth of field, so you could go in and maybe focus on someone’s face where everything in the background would be blurry and then it moves down to maybe a Super 16, like what is in our pocket camera or in our micro cameras, that type of thing.

Larry Jordan: If I’m looking at sensor size, do I consider the size of the sensor to be more important or the quality of the lens that’s in front of it?

Kendall Eckman: That’s probably equal. I’d say both. It just depends on what you’re shooting. Just for instance, a lot of people look at our little pocket camera that I mentioned and that’s a Super 16 size sensor but that’s been used in motion pictures and national commercials. A thousand dollar camera and a lot of people come up at shows and say, “What would you really shoot this with? Corporate videos,” and I say, “Well, actually it goes all the way up the scale,” and I think on those they probably do get up into the higher lens choices, the most expensive lenses, when they’re doing that type of shooting, motion pictures.

Larry Jordan: Another question is frame size, whether we should shoot 720 or 1080 or 2K or 2.5 or 4K. How should you decide what frame size to shoot?

Kendall Eckman: I would say if you’re going to get up into something like 4K, that might be because you want to do some pan and crop and go around the image, so you have all of that room to work with, you might do that, but if you’re doing commercials or you’re doing corporate videos, then something in HD would probably be fine. We’re finding nowadays that a lot of people are shooting in 4K, primarily because some of the studios, I believe Netflix, I think even Sony is doing this with their on demand stuff, they want it all shot in 4K at this point and I believe some of that is – and with our customers too – that they want to come in and have 4K for the future, so some of them are shooting in that resolution right now. But as you know, HD looks very good too.

Larry Jordan: Next big question is frame rate. What frame rate should I shoot? I was reflecting, we used to have to only deal with three – we had 24, 25 and 29.97 – and now it seems like there’s an unlimited number of frame rates. What should be your driving criteria on which one to select?

Kendall Eckman: Well, again, it depends on what you’re shooting. If you’re shooting something in motion pictures, you’re going to get 24 frames, but of course what we’ve done is we’ve gotten into 60 frames. As you said, these weren’t available before. You can get even into 120, like on our URSA Mini you can do up to 60 in 4K and you can do 120 in the HD; and then our big URSA camera, you can do double that, you can do 120 in 4K and 240 in HD. The reason for that is then you can go back and you can give it more of a slow-mo look and that’s what a lot of people are looking for, especially if they’re doing sports or any action shot and they want to have some slow-mo in there, they’ll shoot in the higher frame rate.

Larry Jordan: Is another benefit of a higher frame rate sharper edges, in other words less motion blur because we’re shooting at faster frames so you get a greater clarity to your picture?

Kendall Eckman: Yes, from what I understand, that’s another reason, yes.

Larry Jordan: What’s the relationship, if any, between shutter speed and frame rate? How do you determine what shutter speed to shoot at? In fact, with frame rate, what does shutter speed have to do with anything?

Kendall Eckman: From what I understand, the shutter speed is more to do with the still cameras and we do shutter angle. So the shutter angle would be, for instance, we go from I believe 11 degrees up to 360, which is wide open, so if you went into about 180, it’d be half open and half closed.

Larry Jordan: Another big thing that we’re seeing more about is dynamic range. What’s dynamic range?

Kendall Eckman: It’s really what you’re going to get out of a camera as far as the color information, the shadows and highlights. The more dynamic range, you’re going to be able to see those shadows and highlights and pick up more information. For instance, our cameras right now, most of them have 13 stops of dynamic range and then if you get into our new URSA Mini and our bigger URSA camera with the 4.6K, that gets up to 15 stops of dynamic range. If you’re going to shoot a lot of low light shots, you’re going to shoot maybe directly towards the sun, things like that, you’re not going to have to go in and change as much, you’re going to have a lot color information and those shadows and highlights included in there.

Larry Jordan: Is dynamic range the same thing as HDR?

Kendall Eckman: Not from what I understand. We haven’t really gotten into the HDR. I’m just learning about it myself just recently. Seems like a hot ticket item right now. Of course, I wouldn’t be able to tell you if we were moving towards that anyway, but I haven’t heard anything so I don’t know. Usually I’m the last to know anyway, but that is a hot ticket item and I’ve heard a lot of people talking about it. But from what I understand right now, it’s really done after the camera process, more in post.

Larry Jordan: I’m not after trying to get you to preannounce products, because I really do want to keep you employed, but I just want to be really clear that, although a wide dynamic range gives us more latitude between the blacks and the whites, there is no Blackmagic camera today that shoots HDR. Is that a true statement?

Kendall Eckman: That’s true, yes.

Larry Jordan: I’ve had a chance to see a number of technical demos and HDR really is as cool as people say. I’m very, very excited by it. So by Tuesday could you release something to support it, please?

Kendall Eckman: Oh, of course. We’re right on that.

Larry Jordan: What questions should a filmmaker ask to decide what camera to get? In other words, what are the key three or four questions they need to have answers to to pick the right camera?

Kendall Eckman: I think again we can go back to dynamic range as a big one, how much information they need. Quality, if they’re shooting a corporate video or something that’s not a motion picture, they don’t need to shoot in 4K. That could be something else they could look at and maybe not have to go into that 4K world quite yet although, like we discussed, most people are at this point. Most of the HD cameras are 4K capable that are coming out nowadays. And then just the formats – what formats are easy to work? I’ve heard from a number of customers that if you want to get into the RAW, that CinemaDNG RAW that we have works very well. But, of course, all those flavors of ProRes are very easy to work and whether you’re going into an editing program or some like DaVinci Resolve to do coloring, just something easy to work in.

Larry Jordan: One of the things that RAW requires is not only more file size, but it requires you to do a color pass, so if you’re in a hurry and need to get stuff done quickly, shooting RAW would be a bad choice and ProRes would be a better choice.

Kendall Eckman: Exactly.

Larry Jordan: Are you seeing significant differences in quality between the various flavors of ProRes, or is ProRes fortitude good enough? What do you think?

Kendall Eckman: I think 422 is good enough and I’ve actually heard that from a number of our customers that shoot for national commercials, television shows and things like that. I have a few customers that tell me they only shoot in the ProRes format.

Larry Jordan: For people who want more information about the products that Blackmagic offers, where can they go on the web to learn more?

Kendall Eckman: Blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan: And Kendall Eckman is the Regional Manager for Western North America for Blackmagic Design and, Kendall, thanks for joining us today.

Kendall Eckman: Thank you, Larry.

Larry Jordan: And have yourself a great holiday.

Larry Jordan: I want to invite you to become a member of our video training library. Our training library is unique in the industry. It includes more than 1400 in depth movies, each accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Every movie in our library can be streamed to any internet connected device and it includes production and post production, hardware, software and techniques. It features current and past software releases from both Apple and Adobe and, unlike YouTube, all our training is complete and, unlike other websites, we focus exclusively on media production and post production.

Larry Jordan: Best of all, our memberships are affordable, starting at only $19.99 per month. Focused, in depth, accessible and complete. This is the training that you need to solve problems, master new software and expand your business. I invite you to become a member today. Thanks.

Larry Jordan: Welcome to Tech Talk.

Larry Jordan: If you haven’t spent time with Premiere’s libraries, you’re missing a treat. Libraries were added in a release a little earlier this year and libraries allow us to access, organize and share design elements between applications and, with Creative Cloud support, computers and team members. Libraries are automatically synced to your Creative Cloud account. Libraries can be shared between Premiere, After Effects and Photoshop, as well as all of Adobe’s print applications and new with this release is the integration of Adobe’s stock image library with improved searchability and the ability to add stock images to your library, which can then be shared between Premiere, Photoshop and After Effects.

Larry Jordan: At this time, libraries don’t support video, and at this time you can’t copy a clip from Premiere into the library. It’s more of an aggregating thing rather than sharing different elements, but the cool thing is libraries can be shared between projects, between computers, between applications, between collaborating team members. This is really neat. Let me show you how they work.

Larry Jordan: Here, I’ve created a brand new project and to access libraries, we go up to the window menu, go down to libraries and it opens up a free floating window. Now, I’ve already got a few still images built into my library. We can create as many libraries as I want by going up to this fly out menu and saying ‘New library’, but what I want to do here – let’s just close this – we can switch between libraries. I’ve got a webinar library, but we’ll work with My Library, which is the default setting. We can see thumbnails or we can see simply a list of clips, but I want to search Adobe stock.

Larry Jordan: Let’s find something. Oh, it’s near Christmas, let’s look for a snow scene. Snow and forest and now it goes out to the web and it starts to find snowy forest scenes and if I like it, I can click on it and it takes me to a website which tells me more about it and, by the way, the first time you sign up you can get ten free images, which I’m jealously guarding, I’m not going to use them for this presentation. Hold the control key down and when you control click on it, we can view details on the web, which is the same thing as double clicking, find similar shots on the web or I want to save a preview to my library.

Larry Jordan: Now let me just make my library a little bit bigger and there is that stock image. Well, this stock image is now sharable between all the different Adobe applications that I have on my system. To add this to a project, all I have to do is grab it and drag it, and it’s now added to my project. I can dock the library by grabbing it and just pulling it up to here and now I’ve got the library docked as part of my workspace interface.

Larry Jordan: If I want to add this to a scene, let’s just create something nice here and we’ll add this to a project by dragging it over, and we will right mouse click on it and we’re going to say set this to frame size. I don’t want to scale it to frame size, that gives up resolution. We learned that a couple of weeks ago on our 4K and Premiere project that we talked about when we were shooting iPhone video. We’ll go up to the effect controls. By the way, the cool thing about the effect controls is that the transform controls have now been GPU accelerated, which is just really nice because you don’t have to waste time any more. All this motion stuff is going to happen just unbelievably, ridiculously fast.

Larry Jordan: And so we’ve got this very nice winter scene. Now, the cool thing is this is a low resolution image, it’s got an Adobe stock watermark in it, but when I decide that this is exactly the image that I want to use for my project, because I can pull as many previews as I want without spending a dime, I just simply go up to Adobe Stock, buy the image, it’s swapped out, all the new resolution is added and any geometries, any transforms, any effects, all that stuff is applied to the new high res not watermarked image without me having to do anything. No reconciling of one file to another, it all happens magically in the background.

Larry Jordan: Lynette Kent is a professional photographer who travels the world recording amazing landscapes. She’s also an unconventional computer guru, a demo artist and one of the leaders of the Adobe Technology Exchange of Southern California. This is a professional organization for graphics designers, photographers and artists. Hello, Lynette, welcome.

Lynette Kent: Hello.

Larry Jordan: Lynette, what first got you interested in photography?

Lynette Kent: Oh gosh, that goes way back, just taking photos and my brother was a pro photographer so I started doing it as well.

Larry Jordan: By the way, for those watching, to see Lynette’s work, because we’re going to be talking about it, visit her website at lynettekent.com and view any of her galleries and you’ll be lucky if you’re paying any attention to us once you take a look at her photographs. Lynette, before we talk about your creative work, I want to focus on the business of taking pictures. You do a lot of international travel. What gear do you pack and how do you work around airline weight restrictions?

Lynette Kent: Oh, that’s a challenge. I started out wearing a vest with all these giant pockets and my husband was also wearing one, so we were filled with pockets, as well as both our backpacks and that would have worked except that I’m five foot three and with this big vest on with camera pockets that could hold a 70 to 200 28 lens, they kept stopping me, saying I was carrying an extra bag, and they wanted to weigh my vest. The last time that happened, we were coming back from Scotland and I finally agree, I said, “Ok, fine, you can weigh my vest in addition to my camera backpack.

Lynette Kent: However, you can see that it is a vest and I want to take out my personal items such as my passport and also my money, because your pounds in Britain weigh a lot.” Anyway, the lady behind the counter gave up and did not ask me to weigh my vest, which would have sent me way over the 12 kilo limit. So now I’m looking at what else we can do. We’ve got a new kind of vest that isn’t quite so obviously a bag and then I think one of the solutions is to really decide which lenses and equipment you’re taking and get yourself a Sherpa like my husband. A six foot one Sherpa really helps.

Larry Jordan: Well, remind him he’s not supposed to pack any clothing, it’s all supposed to be gear.

Lynette Kent: Oh no, the clothing goes in the checked bags. There’s nothing in the backpacks other than camera equipment.

Larry Jordan: Well, thinking about that, what cameras to you prefer to shoot with?

Lynette Kent: Right now, I’m shooting a Canon 5D mark four – mark three. Wishful thinking on the four – and just a variety of their L glass.

Larry Jordan: Which gets me to my second question, do you have lenses that you prefer in terms of manufacturers and/or focal length?

Lynette Kent: Well, actually I love the 70 to 200 from Canon except not the F28, which most people prefer. I like the F4 IS lens. It’s much lighter weight, so it’s easier for me to hand hold and manage everything and to get it in that bag, and it’s just easier all the way around. Actually, to me it feels sharper than the F28 lens. Then the other one I really love right now is my newest lens, my 100 to 400 version 2 from Canon. It’s got incredible reach and, again, it’s light enough weight that I can hand hold it.

Larry Jordan: Are you picking Canon because it’s from the same company as makes your camera or because of the weight or because of how it looks?

Lynette Kent: Well, looks are always really important but it’s probably because it’s L glass and the reputation that Canon has. I do have a Sigma lens and I have a Tamron lens, but you asked which were my preferred lenses right now, those were it. And then a 24, I’m still looking for what I want for a wide angle.

Larry Jordan: Well, I’ve looked at almost all the galleries on your website. Your Arizona cowboy is wonderful; the shots from Hawaii were wonderful, though I have a creative question for those; and the south of France just were liquid, which brought me to are you capturing these images in camera or is there massive Photoshop massaging going on after the fact?

Lynette Kent: Not really massive Photoshopping. I got very lazy when Lightroom came out and I don’t really work that much in Photoshop or even Lightroom. I take way too many photos so I have to sort and then I’m really just double checking the white balance, of course, but I usually do that in camera with a color checker passport from X-Rite and sometimes I create a profile for the camera, but it just depends. If it’s a sunset or a sunrise photo, I leave it as it was in camera as far as the colors go. I might remove a dust blur on the lens if I spot one, but I’m pretty careful with my lenses and try to keep them really clean, so try to avoid that. I try to avoid most post if I can.

Larry Jordan: Which is interesting, because there are a lot of people who prefer to work in post and just capture something and then manipulate it in post because they want more of a surreal effect, and you’re really trying to do hyper reality as far as I can tell.

Lynette Kent: Yes. Yes, I like traditional real painting and photography.

Larry Jordan: Thinking about that, your work tends to be outdoors. Do you do any lighting at all with your scenes? Are you’re shooting in HDR format? And if you are doing lighting, how are you lighting it?

Lynette Kent: I don’t like to shoot people, basically, because I’m just really bad at it and so I do like scenics and that comes from my painting background. I did landscape painting in watercolors and so I learned mostly to do that and that’s what I see when I look through the viewfinder, is I’m seeing what could have been or could become a painting, so I’m actually not lighting anything outdoors. I have used a reflector, but nothing that’s on those galleries at all.

Larry Jordan: I noticed in your image you’re still being able to retain shadow detail. I’m thinking of the window that’s looking out onto a landscape and some of your foreground shots, and you’re still holding detail in the sky. Are you using grad filters here or are you using HDR?

Lynette Kent: I don’t think there’s anything on the website that has HDR, although I have done it a few times. I did get into the graduated ND filters, as well as ND filters, especially for slowing water and stuff. I don’t know if you’re referring to one of the ones, looking through a window outdoors?

Larry Jordan: The windows were half open, the one on the right was a little bit more open than the one on the left, and we were looking through that and we were holding the shadow detail of the texture of the wood of the windows and still holding the light outside. It looked like there had to be some light there.

Lynette Kent: There was light outside and there was light in the room and it was very gray outside, so even though the light outside is much more powerful, because it was dark and gray and a gloomy day – if it’s the one I’m thinking of – the light from the inside actually helped and then that probably was a little bit of Lightroom lightening to the shadows use. Oh, I do do that a lot. I lighten up the shadows, but you have to be really careful because you end up with too much noise.

Larry Jordan: With the water shots that you’re doing, you have such a liquid, molten, soft flow to the water. Is that a time exposure or something else that you’re doing?

Lynette Kent: It’s usually a long exposure using some kind of an ND filter so that you can do a long exposure, obviously, and the trick there actually is learning how fast the water’s moving and then is that doing to be a ten second, five second, one second shot? What is it going to be? So that it doesn’t look like foam and yet you have water movement but it has a liquid flow, so I usually try about 20 or 30 of those shots and pick the one I like best. The old trial and error.

Larry Jordan: But it’s a fairly long exposure, five or ten seconds.

Lynette Kent: Yes it is. It depends. If it’s a waterfall and it’s just flowing, then you need to slow it. If it’s cascading really hard, you need to slow it more. If it’s a slow moving waterfall then you can go a little bit less.

Larry Jordan: Waterfalls are slower in some places than other places?

Lynette Kent: Well, it depends. If you’re at the base of a 300 foot drop, the water looks like it’s just pounding down and it seems like you can go a little bit faster than you can if it’s rippling over rocks, yes. It’s wrong to say that it flows at a different rate, but it actually feels like it.

Larry Jordan: With the shots that you did in Hawaii with the molten lava, there was almost a lack of scale. I couldn’t tell if I was looking at something which was macro or something which was huge. Was that intentional?

Lynette Kent: I was in a helicopter shooting with a 500 millimeter lens, so I was almost right on top of it.

Larry Jordan: Wow.

Lynette Kent: My legs were burning in the helicopter. We had an open door and, yes, it was hot.

Larry Jordan: Unbelievable.

Lynette Kent: We were about 15 feet above the flow.

Larry Jordan: I just realized, do you do your work principally on assignment or do you just love traveling?

Lynette Kent: I love traveling. Someday I’ll do some assignments, but most of these have been because I just enjoy creating them. I used to use a lot of my own photos in my books when I was writing for Wiley Publishing on Photoshop, so I would use either the good ones or the bad ones to illustrate a point on how to do something. But recently they’ve just been mostly for my pleasure.

Larry Jordan: Well, I should mention that you even sell these photos on your website and I encourage everybody to buy six or seven for Christmas.

Lynette Kent: Oh, that would be great, and a series of cards too.

Larry Jordan: Is there a market for photos online?

Lynette Kent: That I’m not sure of.

Larry Jordan: No, no, I’m just saying, are you able to make any money at all from selling your photos? Or is it really just a labor of love?

Lynette Kent: It’s more a labor of love right now. I would love to sell a few, I think there should be some very large ones put into some big conference rooms in some important companies’ walls. That would be great. But right now, it adds something to the travel. You have something you take home.

Larry Jordan: As souvenirs.

Lynette Kent: Well, yes, I never buy souvenirs and so I create my own souvenirs in a sense. But I think if you’ve taken a wonderful trip to some beautiful places around the world, including in this country, it just brings back the memories every time by looking at really great photographs that you took. I think that’s what excites me a lot.

Larry Jordan: Well, you have a spectacular, painterly look to your images and for people who want to learn more, what website can they go to to see your work?

Lynette Kent: To see my work would be www.lynettekent.com.

Larry Jordan: That’s lynettekent.com and Lynette herself is the person we’re talking to. Lynette, thanks for joining us today.

Lynette Kent: Oh, you’re welcome. Thank you.

Larry Jordan: Take care. Bye bye.

Lynette Kent: Bye bye.

Larry Jordan: It’s time for a Buzz Flashback. Five years ago today…

Jessica Sitomer (archive): Since I can’t advise you, people out there, to breathe in order to relax, my offer to you is write me a letter and just write what’s going on, your frustrations, your fears, your loneliness, even your accomplishments, whatever it is, just write it, email it to me and I promise I will read it and then you can just relax a little bit more, knowing that a complete stranger is out there and knows how you feel.

Larry Jordan: This was a Buzz Flashback.

Larry Jordan: It’s interesting thinking about the photographs that Lynette shoots and how it takes something in real life and transforms it into something totally different. They’re rich, they’re saturated, they’re very painterly, they’re a traditional landscape and fun to look at.

Larry Jordan: I want to thank this week’s guests, starting with Owen Ouywang, Joseph Tully, Kendall Eckman and Lynette Kent for some really interesting interviews. Also, starting next week, we have two very special shows planned. Our Christmas Eve program brings together all our Buzz regulars for a look back at the significant trends, hardware and software, of 2015. Then in two weeks, on New Year’s Eve, we’ll bring the gang back together again for some fearless future casting, looking at hardware and trends to watch during 2016. I think you’ll find both these shows well worth watching, as we talk with Philip Hodgetts, Randi Altman, Jonathan Handel, Michael Kammes, Larry O’Connor and Ned Soltz.

Larry Jordan: There’s a lot of history in our industry and it’s all posted to our website, at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Here you’ll find thousands of interviews all online and all available to you today; and remember to sign up for our free weekly show newsletter.

Larry Jordan: Talk with us on Twitter, @DPBuZZ, and Facebook at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Our theme music is composed by Nathan Dugie Turner with additional music provided by smartsound.com. Text transcripts are provided by Take 1 Transcription – visit take1.tv to learn how they can help you.

Larry Jordan: Our producer is Cirina Catania; our production team is led by Megan Paulos and includes Ed Golya, Keegan Guy, Lindsay Luebbert and Brianna Murphy. On behalf Mike Horton, who is hiding in his house this evening, my name is Larry Jordan and thanks for joining us for The Digital Production Buzz and a very happy holiday to you. Have a good night.

Announcer #1: The Digital Production Buzz was brought to you by Other World Computing, providing quality hardware solutions and extensive technical support to the worldwide computer industry since 1988; and by Blackmagic Design, creating revolutionary solutions for film, post production and television.

Digital Production Buzz – December 17, 2015

Join Larry Jordan and Mike Horton as they talk with Joseph Tully, Kendall Eckman, and Lynette Kent.

  • What Happens When Your Drone Goes Rogue?
  • How to Pick the Best Camera
  • The Art of Being a Professional Photographer
  • Randi’s Perspective: Editing Wars, RED’s Latest Camera, & more
  • Tech Talk: Adobe Stock & Libraries

View Show Transcript

Watch the Full Episode


Buzz on YouTubeTranscript

Listen to the Full Episode


Buzz on iTunesTranscript

Guests this Week

Joseph Tully
Joseph Tully, Founder, Tully & Weiss Criminal Lawyers
What happens if you are flying a drone, you lose control and the drone interferes with police operations? Tonight, Joseph Tully, founder of California criminal law firm Tully & Weiss and author of California: State of Collusion, describes exactly that situation facing student Owen Ouywang where his drone went rogue near San Francisco.
Kendall Eckman
Kendall Eckman, Regional Manager, Western North America, Blackmagic Design
How do you pick the right camera for your project? (Hint: It isn’t necessarily the camera that you own.) Join Kendall Eckman, regional manager for western North America at Blackmagic Design, as he explains how to find the right camera for your next film.
Lynette Kent
Lynette Kent, Author, Artist, Educator, Photographer
Lynette Kent is a professional photographer who travels the world recording amazing landscapes. She is also an unconventional computer guru and one of the leaders of the Adobe Technology Exchange of Southern California. Tonight, she talks about traveling with pro photo gear, taking pictures and the art of being a pro.

Transcript: Digital Production Buzz – December 10, 2015

Digital Production Buzz

December 10, 2015

[Transcripts provided by Take 1 Transcription]

(Click here to listen to this show.)

HOSTS
Larry Jordan
Mike Horton

SEGMENTS
Randi Altman’s Perspective
Tech Talk with Larry Jordan
BuZZ Flashback: Matt Katsolis

GUESTS
Sue Lawson, Editor, Chicago Edit
Maxim Jago, Director, MaximJago.com
Max Votalato, Director/Producer/Editor/Researcher, Freeway City Films
===

Larry Jordan: Tonight on The Buzz, Sue Lawson is an award winning Chicago based editor and recently she associate produced and edited a documentary on guerilla film preservation called ‘Reel Heroes.’ Tonight, she tells us how to save our films.

Larry Jordan: Next, Maxim Jago is an award winning director who’s thinking about the future of media. We’re moving to 4K, but what about 8K and what’s the relevance of more colors or HDR? Tonight, Maxim takes us into the future.

Larry Jordan: Next, filmmaker Max Votolato was born in London but now he lives in LA. His latest documentary is called ‘Freeway City,’ which is the story of Gardena, California, the onetime poker capital of the world. Tonight, we learn how he made it.

Larry Jordan: All this plus a Buzz Flashback, Tech Talk and Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News. The Buzz starts now.

Announcer #1: Tonight’s Digital Production Buzz is brought to you by Other World Computing at macsales.com; and by Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Announcer #2: Since the dawn of digital filmmaking… Authoritative…one show serves a worldwide network of media professionals… Current…uniting industry experts… Production…filmmakers… Post production…and content creators around the planet. Distribution. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now.

Larry Jordan: And welcome to the Digital Production Buzz, the world’s longest running podcast for creative content producers covering media production, post production and marketing around the world. Mike.

Mike Horton: Hmm?

Larry Jordan: Cast your mind back, back into the dim reaches of time.

Mike Horton: Cast my mind back. Ok, yes.

Larry Jordan: Do you remember the first show that you and I did together?

Mike Horton: No. Do you?

Larry Jordan: Yes, I looked it up. I had to because…

Mike Horton: Well, if I’d looked it up, I wouldn’t remember.

Larry Jordan: Yes. November 15th 2007.

Mike Horton: Oh my gosh.

Larry Jordan: More than eight year ago.

Mike Horton: Oh my gosh. Seriously? Eight years ago?

Larry Jordan: Eight years ago and between the time of the first show – by the way, my notes on the first show were rocky, rocky, rocky but nobody died, so it was a little on the shaky side technically…

Mike Horton: You actually keep a diary of notes of every show that we do?

Larry Jordan: Clearly, we have notes on every show but I don’t keep a diary on it because I couldn’t… We’ve had 434 shows since you and I started working together on November 15th, 434.

Mike Horton: Wow.

Larry Jordan: We’ve done 1736 interviews and we’ve had 1311 guests on the show since November 15th 2007.

Mike Horton: And I don’t remember one of them.

Larry Jordan: It’s a frightening thought, isn’t it?

Mike Horton: I’m still trying to figure out how to get to this place. No, that is a frightening thought, but that’s an awesome statistic.

Larry Jordan: And think about it, we’ve done a new show every week, every year, for eight years.

Mike Horton: That’s not easy.

Larry Jordan: That’s not easy.

Mike Horton: It is, it’s a lot of hard work and you’ve got to thank everybody around here and you’ve got to thank you and congratulations on all this, because this has imparted a lot of wisdom to the world that this world needed to know.

Larry Jordan: Well, thank you, but it would not be as much fun if you weren’t on the show.

Mike Horton: You’re damn right, and I’ll try to remember this show.

Larry Jordan: Let’s focus on the important stuff. Also, I want to remind you to subscribe to our free weekly show newsletter at digitalproductionbuzz.com. You can keep up with all of Mike’s activities every issue, every week. It’s an inside look at both The Buzz and the lives that our co-hosts lead, plus quick links to all the different segments on the show and, best of all, every issue is free.

Larry Jordan: We’ve got a really exciting show with some amazing guests. Mike and I will be back with Sue Lawson, right after Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News.

Larry Jordan: This is Randi Altman’s Perspective.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman has been writing about our industry for more than 20 years. In fact, she’s the editor in chief of her own website called postperspective.com and, as always, it’s wonderful, Randi, to have you back on the show. How are you doing?

Randi Altman: I’m good, Larry. How are you?

Larry Jordan: Well, it’s getting closer and closer to the holidays, which means it’s the award season and, man, you talk to everybody that’s out for awards today. What are you hearing and what are you paying attention to?

Randi Altman: Well, we’ve been covering some of the top directors for the last month or two and what I’ve been noticing in terms of trends is there really is no trend. We’ve got some pretty high end directors on some films that were mentioned in the Golden Globe nominations and some of the other nominations that have been announced so far. We’ve spoken to Danny Boyle and Ridley Scott and Todd Haines and Todd Hooper and we have Quentin Tarantino coming up and Spike Lee.

Randi Altman: What I’ve been discovering is these guys are all over the place in terms of who’s shooting digital, who’s shooting film and who’s shooting a combination of both; it’s been fairly interesting. Then they’re all debating on the post schedule as well. You’ve got someone like Ridley Scott, who loves digital, just loves it, can’t wait for the process to get even faster and wants a faster post schedule. He did 25 weeks on ‘The Martian’ and he thought that was too long, so you’ve got a director like him and then you’ve got a director like Quentin, who really wants to take his time, wants to shoot 70 millimeter, and it’s fun to watch.

Larry Jordan: The other thing that I was impressed with, especially with the Golden Globes, because the Hollywood Foreign Press Association loves to throw out shocking nominations, is films that we thought would be heavily nominated, like ‘The Martian,’ are totally ignored, and films that we weren’t expecting to get nominated, like ‘Spotlight,’ get a lot of attention. Are we seeing a shift away from traditional Hollywood movies and more of an emphasis on independents?

Randi Altman: I think we’ve been seeing that for the last couple of years. ‘The Martian’ has a lot of visual effects, but they might be moving away from nominating those movies with visual effects and going more for personal dramas, so I’m not terribly surprised about that.

Larry Jordan: Well, it’s going to be fun to watch because award season runs now until March of next year and there are going to be all kinds of conversations about who’s ahead and who isn’t and we’ll have you give us the latest scoop in terms of what’s happening behind the scenes. Randi, for people who want more information about you and your writing, what website can they go to?

Randi Altman: They can visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: Postperspective.com and Randi Altman is the editor in chief. Randi thanks for joining us today.

Randi Altman: Thanks, Larry.

Larry Jordan: To read more from Randi Altman, visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: When you’re working with media, one thing is essential – your computer needs peak performance. However, when it comes to upgrading your Mac, there are so many different options to choose from that the process can be confusing. That’s why Other World Computing carries the best upgrades that lets your computer performance and storage grow as your needs grow.

Larry Jordan: Since 1988, OWC has become one of the most trusted names in quality hardware and comprehensive support to the worldwide computer industry. With an extensive online catalog of Mac, iPhone and iPad enhancement products, as well as a dedicated team of knowledgeable experts providing first rate tech support, OWC has everything you need to take your current system to the next level. Whether you need to maximize your system’s memory, add blazing speed or enhance reliability, look no further than the friendly experts at OWC. Learn more by visiting macsales.com today.

Larry Jordan: Sue Lawson is a Chicago based editor specializing in narratives, documentaries, indie features and trailers. Her clients include international recording artists, Fortune 500 corporations and, of course, lots and lots of independent filmmakers. Hello, Sue, welcome back.

Sue Lawson: Hi Larry, how are you?

Mike Horton: Hi Sue.

Larry Jordan: Mike and I have been looking forward to this…

Sue Lawson: Oh, Michael’s there too.

Mike Horton: I’m here.

Sue Lawson: Oh… my heart.

Mike Horton: I know, it’s so great to talk to you and see you.

Sue Lawson: You too.

Larry Jordan: I was just thinking, Sue, you’ve been a long time member of the Chicago Creative Pro User Group. What’s the film and media community like around Chicago?

Sue Lawson: It’s actually getting a lot stronger these days. We were flying over… for a while, but it’s coming back, which is great.

Mike Horton: Well, now you have, what, three primetime series that are filming in Chicago, like Chicago Med, Chicago Police…

Sue Lawson: Fire.

Mike Horton: Yes, Chicago something.

Sue Lawson: Police, Fire, Chicago CSI.

Mike Horton: Yes, exactly, so that’s really stepped up, so there’s a lot of television shows shooting in Chicago right now.

Sue Lawson: It’s awesome. It’s coming back, baby. What can I say?

Larry Jordan: I was just wondering, where’s the bulk of the business? Is it in corporate media, traditional media like you and Mike were just talking about, or independent films?

Sue Lawson: For Chicago, I still think that the bulk of it is in corporate, which is good. Corporate and agency stuff, that’s probably really the hub of it all, but the independent scene is blossoming here, it’s getting stronger, so that’s a good thing.

Mike Horton: Back when I was an actor…

Larry Jordan: That long ago?

Sue Lawson: Back then.

Mike Horton: That was way, way back but we used to do a lot of commercials in Chicago. Chicago was like the commercial capital. There was New York and then there was Chicago and we used to go back to Chicago to film a lot of commercials. Sometimes we’d come out to LA, but Chicago had all these great big agencies, so it was a great place to film.

Larry Jordan: And great architecture.

Mike Horton: And great architecture.

Sue Lawson: Fabulous architecture. Obviously, Michael, what we need is for you to come back to Chicago so we can… that commercial was. You went to LA, that’s what happens.

Mike Horton: I know, that’s what happens.

Larry Jordan: Don’t stroke his ego any more than it is already because he’s unlivable at that point.

Mike Horton: Merry Christmas.

Sue Lawson: Merry Christmas.

Larry Jordan: Sue, what caught my attention recently was an announcement that you’ve been working on a documentary called ‘Reel Heroes: Saving Film One Frame at a Time,’ and while I know Mike would like to talk about making commercials in Chicago just to get you to smile, tell us about this documentary. This whole idea of archiving and preservation is one that I think all of us are overlooking, so tell us what that show is about.

Sue Lawson: It is absolutely awesome. I kind of stumbled into it. I know the filmmakers, I’ve worked with them on a couple of other projects, and they have been working on this for 12 years so far. It started out as a quirky little story about film preservationists, film collectors, the people who have day jobs doing something else somewhere else, most of them still in the film industry, but it really evolved over time into something much bigger than they thought it was going to be and, fortunately, that’s when I got involved. It’s awesome that way, but some of the things that I have found so interesting about that was the FBI actually had, I don’t want to call it a witch hunt just in case I’m on their list and my broom’s in the closet…

Mike Horton: Well, you will be after this show.

Sue Lawson: That’s right, that’s right. I’ll just tell them I know you guys and I’ll be fine.

Larry Jordan: There’s no question, that’ll get you out.

Sue Lawson: But they had actually really done this witch hunt to go after people who were collecting films – I think one of the most notable ones was Roddy McDowall and I was like, “Really?” – and what they did about trying to destroy films – I understand the copyright issues, if you don’t own the copyright, you don’t own the film, you don’t own that print – but so much of our cultural heritage has just been destroyed because there wasn’t room for it and people didn’t think it was necessary to save these things. So it’s kind of near and dear, I think, to all of our hearts in the industry.

Larry Jordan: That’s part of why we have such a sense of triumph when we read about the restoration of a film from the ’30s and ’40s because we are only able to restore a fraction of our film history.

Sue Lawson: Oh, exactly.

Larry Jordan: So what was the film about?

Sue Lawson: The film will be about – because it’s still in post production. In fact, it just recently entered the post production side of things after, as I said, about 12 years of interviews that they’ve been conducting, so…

Larry Jordan: But is it about the process of preserving film or is about the people who are preserving film or is it about the films that have been preserved? What point of view does it take?

Sue Lawson: It is about the people who are preserving the films and it is not so much about the process of preserving them, but the process that these people are going through to find just those missing frames to go ahead and restore the films. I think one of the most notable people was Kevin Brownlow, who actually got a special Academy Award for restoration, I want to say it was of ‘Napoleon,’ which came out way before my time.

Mike Horton: It was early 1900s, yes.

Sue Lawson: Yes, I believe so. It is about the people and their quest to go ahead and preserve films and about some of the films themselves. There are a lot of films that are in the public domain, if you can find them now, and a lot of these collectors are nice enough to share the films and some of the films, at least clips of the films, are going to be in this project as well.

Mike Horton: How do people determine which films to preserve?

Sue Lawson: I think that’s a really good question. I don’t know if there is a correct answer to that because in a perfect world they would all be preserved.

Mike Horton: Yes. You know what the great thing is, at least in 2015 versus, say, 2000? To preserve films now with all the technical equipment we have right now, it’s a hell of a lot cheaper than it was just 15 years ago. So we can take a lot of these films that we were asking, “Should we preserve it or should we not preserve it?” and it’s really not going to cost us that much, it’s going to cost us that much in time is what It’s going to cost us.

Sue Lawson: Exactly, and to be able to preserve them in their original state, in the film state, not just …

Mike Horton: That’s where you need the people. That’s where the people come in.

Sue Lawson: That’s where the people and the money comes in as well, because that is a costlier process. But obviously the people who are profiled in this piece, and some of them are pretty notable, as I said, Kevin Brownlow, Joe Dante, Leonard Maltin. There are a number of named people in this and people who are just really known within the film collector and film preservation world as well, but they’re obviously not getting the same press as, for example, Scorsese is, who obviously is at the forefront of this, he and… and I think Clint Eastwood’s on the Board of Directors for the film group as well. It’s amazing and I think people understand this is something that we almost have to do because we lose it otherwise and film is hard to preserve and hard to keep, it’s a very volatile medium. Just being exposed to air and – poof! – it’s gone.

Larry Jordan: Of the interviews that you’ve heard, because you were involved both as an associate producer and will be working with the editorial crew, which one stands out the most to you and why?

Sue Lawson: I actually can’t choose. I was going to say it depends on the day, but I think so many of them are truly phenomenal. I think one of the things that caught me first were the interviews where they delved into the FBI going on this hunt for people and how paranoid people were about this. A couple of people who were in the film actually have asked not to be in it now because they are still concerned about repercussions from the government.

Mike Horton: Wow.

Sue Lawson: Really, after all these years, you’re still concerned about that, so it’s an interesting journey that we’re taking.

Larry Jordan: What method of preservation are your guerilla preservationists using? How are they keeping the film safe?

Sue Lawson: They’re actually going ahead and restoring film itself and having more film prints made. This particular project, although it was shot on digital and even tape – if you think 12 years ago, it began its world in tape – but they’re looking at doing film outs on this as well because they are true preservationists and they truly believe in the beauty and the pristine quality of film, even when it’s all scratchy. There’s something magical about it.

Mike Horton: Just don’t run it through a projector. Just keep it in the can.

Larry Jordan: Never show it, just keep it.

Mike Horton: Never show it, yes.

Larry Jordan: Now, you’re going to be the supervising editor on this and they’ve been shooting for 12 years. You must have a plethora of – I work in that word as often as I can – a plethora of…

Mike Horton: Let me look that up, Larry. Oooh.

Larry Jordan: …of formats. What’s your workflow? How are you getting all this stuff organized and how are you going to edit it?

Sue Lawson: Well, first of all, as you said, organization is the key. They have a ton of stuff, and they’re not done, they still have a few more interviews that they would like to go ahead and get. But it’s the basic format of determining what it is you have, what the different formats are. I categorize all of those.

Sue Lawson: What I actually want to do is let’s get the cut made first and then we’ll go ahead and worry about transcoding things, as opposed to transcoding 12 years’ worth of material. Let’s work a little differently with that. Storage to me is probably the biggest thing that we have to worry about at this time because there’s so much and I like having things neat and tidy and organized, but between archival footage itself, all of the interviews that they’ve done, all the B-roll, of course, that goes along with everything, it’s a lot.

Larry Jordan: So how are you organizing it? Are you using a digital asset manager or pads of paper or what?

Sue Lawson: I’d like to use the old rock and chisel type of thing from the Flintstones era. I thought that would work really well and it’s pretty indestructible as long as I don’t drop it. Yes, I’m big on doing digital asset management, backing things up again and again and again and as far as keeping track of everything that we have, I don’t want to say I’m a paper and pencil type of gal, but I still like things like spreadsheets for those things. I like keeping track of things that way; and when I’m working with other people, I think that that’s really a good way of doing things at this point.

Larry Jordan: So although I keep trying to pin you down and you keep tap-dancing around the issue, have you decided whether you’re going to use a digital asset manager? And if so, which one?

Mike Horton: Use FileMaker Pro. That’s what you would love.

Sue Lawson: You think that would be the one that I should go with, Michael?

Mike Horton: Absolutely. That’s what Walter Murch goes with, so you might as well go with it too.

Sue Lawson: Might as well, then, yes. I really thought I could find something better than…

Mike Horton: You and Walter are like this, we all know that, come on.

Sue Lawson: We’re like this. We’re like this.

Larry Jordan: So you’re not going to answer the question?

Sue Lawson: No, I’m not answering that yet, yes.

Larry Jordan: Have you started editing yet?

Sue Lawson: They have got as far as getting the trailers done for additional financial resourcing, for their Indiegogo campaigns. To actually start on the project itself, we are at that point now and we’re starting to pull everything together. It’s a process and I as the supervising editor, for better or worse, my hands are tied on this one. That’s the frustrating part for me, because I just want to sit down and start moving things around. But that is not my role in this one, yet.

Larry Jordan: Then what is your role? What does a supervising editor do?

Sue Lawson: My role on this particular project as the supervising editor is to keep them on track, keep them on budget, make sure that they’re moving in the right direction, offer creative advice as well as to what’s working, what’s not working, how the story should be flowing and, truthfully, I’m touching things up as well as far as taking things out, making them look better. I’ll probably be doing the final color work on it as well, just because the experience that the current editor has on it, which are the filmmakers, and they don’t have quite as much experience on a regular basis as somebody older like me.

Larry Jordan: We have a live chat going and Eric says that he’s tired just thinking about the amount of work that’s involved in editing this.

Mike Horton: Yes, seriously. That’s a lot of work.

Sue Lawson: Eric, that’s why you’re not editing it. But he’s right, it is a lot of work, but frankly it’s nothing that we’re not accustomed to. The last documentary I did, granted it was only five years’ worth of footage and interviews, but there was a lot with that one. This one, I will at least look at as being a little happier subject, because the last one was on sex trafficking. That was a really tough one to do and I’m the one who edited that one. That was a tough one to do. This one, at least, is happy. You know, we’re looking at movies.

Mike Horton: Yes.

Larry Jordan: As you’ve looked at this, in a really short period of time, what have you learned as you’ve been involved with this process?

Sue Lawson: From what standpoint?

Larry Jordan: From something you didn’t know before that you know now. Is there a workflow thing that you’ve learned or is it pretty much the same thing, just a different subject?

Sue Lawson: I think it’s the same thing, just a different subject. One of the workflows that I like to emulate, and it’s online, everybody can see it anywhere anyplace, but it’s pretty much the standard workflow that they use with Frontline. Steve Audette was kind enough, I think, at one point to post that online and that’s our go to Bible. “Let’s see what we can do about emulating that type of organization structure,” because we’ve all been given projects that are just one hot mess when you get them and…

Larry Jordan: Sue, thanks for joining us today. We’ll keep track of this project in the future and your website is?

Sue Lawson: Thanks guys. My website is chicagoedit.com and the website for the movie is reelheroesfilm.com.

Larry Jordan: Thank you, Sue. The websites are reelheroesfilm.com and chicagoedit.com and Sue Lawson is involved with both. You take care. Bye bye.

Mike Horton: Bye Sue.

Larry Jordan: The folks at Blackmagic Design keep shaking up the industry. The new DaVinci Resolve 12 could be all the video editor you need. DaVinci Resolve 12 combines professional non-linear video editing with the world’s most advanced color corrector, so now you can edit, color correct, finish and deliver all from one system.

Larry Jordan: The brand new Blackmagic Video Assist is a high resolution professional monitor and recorder that allows you to see a full pixel 1080 image large enough so you can focus a DSLR camera accurately; and the new URSA Mini cameras provide stunning quality with a 4.6K sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range, compact, lightweight and built from advanced magnesium alloy.

Larry Jordan: When it comes to state of the art technology, look first at Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan: Maxim Jago is a film director, a screenwriter and an author who splits his time between filmmaking and speaking as a futurist. He’s a regular speaker at media technology conferences, film festivals and events celebrating creativity. He’s also the Chief Innovation Officer at filmdo.com and a mentor to new filmmakers. Hello, Maxim, welcome back.

Maxim Jago: Hello, how are you? It’s good to see you.

Mike Horton: Hello.

Larry Jordan: It’s good to hear your voice. You know, the last time we chatted was in October, talking about your ‘James Bond’ spoof, but this time I want you to put your futurist hat on and share your thoughts on the trend toward ever higher resolution video. 4K is well entrenched in production, it’s moving quickly into the consumer market, but is it likely to be successful?

Maxim Jago: Well, it’s an interesting question. Ultimately, our job is to produce media for people to experience and we’re finding that those people can’t tell the difference between a 4K screen and HD. Now, they can really obviously if it’s SD and so the TV manufacturers are trying to produce a marketing campaign that 4K is better, there are more pixels.

Maxim Jago: But I was doing a little bit of a calculation and actually, at enough of a distance from a screen, the picture is effectively retina anyway and this idea of retina is that you can’t see individual pixels, so it’s as high resolution as your eye can perceive, and this was the thing that Apple made a big fuss about when they came out with the retina screen for the iPhone and now that’s become a standard that we refer to.

Maxim Jago: But I think that a lot of people are just going to skip 4K. HD’s great, there’s not that much 4K material available, but what I’m estimating is that we will typically, because we can, go for higher and higher resolution screens. If you look at frame rate, a lot of productions now, people are over cranking at double frame rate because they can. It’s extra data but it just means you’ve got the potential to do slo-mo and you’ve got that flexibility in post.

Maxim Jago: I’m seeing a lot of people shooting 4K but they’re not finishing in 4K at all. They’re finishing and grading and working on their content in 2K or 1080, really, HD. But I have this theory that we will inevitably go for higher and higher resolution screens because the technology is there, but I think that we will top out in terms of distribution at 8K and the reason I think we’re going to top out at that level is I worked out that if you had a 20 foot wide screen, which is as big as any front room I can imagine anybody having a TV on, at nine feet away, if you were working in 8K, it’s retina. So even if you could go higher than that resolution, it would be fundamentally pointless and really…

Larry Jordan: Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait. Stop a second. In order for us to perceive an 8K image, it has to be viewed on a 20 foot screen?

Maxim Jago: Oh no. No, no. No, of course you can view it on anything, but it’s pointless unless your nose is almost on the screen because the further away you are from the screen, the smaller the dots appear, so at…

Larry Jordan: Wait, wait, wait, I disagree with that. You’re absolutely right, the further you get from the screen, the smaller the dots appear. Or the smaller the screen.

Maxim Jago: Right, yes.

Larry Jordan: So if you were looking at an 8K image on a six foot screen, are you going to see 8K?

Maxim Jago: No. You can’t perceive that image resolution, that’s the point. If you had a six foot screen, I didn’t do the calculation for six feet, ah goodness, I mean, if nine…

Larry Jordan: The answer’s two and a half.

Maxim Jago: Two and a half feet?

Larry Jordan: Two and a half feet away from the screen to see 8K resolution.

Maxim Jago: Thank you, there you go. That sounds about right if it’s nine feet at 20 feet. So if you are pushing for higher and higher resolution media, then it’s pointless. For acquisition, maybe, if you’re doing scientific work or if you’re producing, ARRI came out with a 65 mm frame sensor and then they produced this extremely high resolution, high megapixel video camera and then, when they were asked what it was for, they had to say, “Well, we don’t know but we thought some people would have a use for it.”

Maxim Jago: So I think that we’re always going to push for better and better acquisition, we want to accurately reproduce what’s there. They humanize much better than cameras currently for perceiving real life, but in terms of distribution NHK in Japan are now trialing an 8K 100 megabit AVC intra-broadcast through satellite, just to see if they can. It’s an enormous amount of data to put in the satellite bandwidth to distribute at that resolution. My point is that I think we will go for higher and higher resolution screens, but there is a biological limit to how high it’s worth going and, like you just said, on a six foot screen it’s two and a half feet.

Maxim Jago: It’s literally pointless to broadcast anything higher than that, even if we could, and what I think’s interesting about that is that we’re reaching new limits in our technology that are not defined by the technology, but actually by our own biology. We’re very unlikely to have bigger walls in our lounges, we’re very unlikely to have bigger screens, so we’re reaching a new threshold, a new limit, which I think is really interesting. What’s much more interesting for the end user experience, I think, is HDR, broader color gamuts, that kind of stuff.

Larry Jordan: See, that’s what I want to get to. I think that once consumers see an HDR picture or a wider color gamut picture, they’re not going to be interested in resolution. They’re going to be interested in the vibrancy and the emulation of real life that HDR provides that standard dynamic range can’t begin to touch and, in fact, SD starts to look really good if you’re looking at an HDR picture in a way that it never did when compared to HD. The difference between HD and HDR is just unbelievably toward HDR. Would you agree?

Maxim Jago: I 100 percent agree. In fact, as you know, I’m really into the VR headset thing and I think that’s going to be a huge new medium, but you’re not always going to want to put a headset on to watch the news or to see something passing on a screen. Those are going to be a particular type of experience. Somebody said something interesting about HDR that hadn’t occurred to me before, just for a frame of reference for people who aren’t familiar with the high dynamic range idea, most TVs go to maybe 100 or 200 Mits. I think that’s one candle power per square meter of light.

Maxim Jago: The new screen technology they’re talking about in the home, they’re looking at either going to 1,000 or 2,000 Mits, so it’s ten or 20 times as bright as a regular TV. But what’s important about it is the contrast range. You still have very dark shadows with detail in them and have very bright parts of the image and, as someone said, when you see a bright image come on an HDR screen, you have a physiological reaction. Your pupils shrink and so you feel that in your eyes, you feel a physical reaction to what’s happening on the screen, which is something that we just haven’t had before. I’ve had headaches from bad stereoscopic, but it’s not quite the same thing.

Maxim Jago: So I think this is absolutely the next step. I think it’s relatively straightforward technology to implement, but then all of these things are. By the time you’ve paid for the R&D, manufacturing the technology isn’t that hard. The question is what do audiences really feel strongly about? And I’m with you, I think HDR is the next step. I think what’ll happen is we’ll get HDR, we’ll get these better color gamuts, we’ll get all of that, and I think the manufacturers will just sort of sneak in, “Oh, by the way, it’s UHD,” or, “It’s 8K.” It just will be, but that’s years away. I think we’re going to start to see HDR media very, very soon.

Mike Horton: To interrupt here, you brought up VR. I had a demo earlier today in west LA of a VR workflow. It was VR a 10K workflow in post production. You’ve seen the mounts where they have several GoPros or several Red cameras or whatever and they’re all shooting at the same time, when they’re actually filming entertaining for VR, and then you ingest them into your computer and I saw a 10K workflow. Of course, you’re maybe going to acquire 10K but you’re not going to distribute 10K, but it was really interesting and, yes, we can do it. It was incredible.

Maxim Jago: I love it. I was speaking with Al Jazeera a while ago about their workflows. You can 3D print a GoPro rig perfectly aligned to them. That’s cheap to do now and you can hire GoPros for $20, $25 a day. You get a 14 camera rig, you can do it stereoscopic if you want, although it takes some finishing, so you just plant one of these things in a location and you can have a reporter in the scene talking to the camera and walking around the camera and saying, “Look over here,” and you can look over there. What they’re saying is if you get it cheap enough, as the front line of a warzone moves, you can put a satellite transmitter in one of these, leave it behind and run.

Mike Horton: Oh, that’s brilliant. That’s absolutely brilliant.

Maxim Jago: Yes. You can get rigs, if you want go around you can do it with something like four cameras, if you want to get a complete circle of image, but if you want a sphere it’s something like seven and if you want to do it beautifully with stereoscopic it’s 14, but imagine if your experience of locations around the world is VR like that. Now, I think that is happening and it’s coming and we’re working on the standardization right now. As usual with new technologies, there’s 15 different competing technologies and we have to pick one.

Larry Jordan: But do you think VR is going to be successful outside of games? Is the average viewer going to want to put on a headset to watch?

Maxim Jago: Yes, I really do. If you look at HD, that was driven by the PlayStation 3 supporting HD and suddenly there was demand for TV, so the price went up and then it went down. I’m a gamer, I’ve been a gamer since ‘Pong’, as they say, and I cannot wait to play ‘Far Cry’ with a VR headset. It will be amazing. But I think that what that will do is pay for the standardization, pay for the reduction in price, pay for the conversion of this complex technology into a consumer technology and, you know, they’re talking about $200 or $300 for a really great VR headset. Yes, many people will have them in the home but, no, they won’t use it for their general TV consumption. They’re going to use it for that one movie that’s been shot especially for it or location stuff.

Mike Horton: Or real estate or architecture. There’s an infinite amount of possibilities it’s going to be used for and you’re going to see all of that at CES in Las Vegas in January.

Maxim Jago: And you know there are two ways of doing VR, right? You’ve got one way where you set the camera in position and the viewer can look in every direction but they can’t navigate. The other way, which is much more complex, is that you generate a 3D model of the environment, you acquire photo quality textures, put those in the 3D environment and allow the viewer, as it were, to navigate the environment.

Maxim Jago: What we’re beginning to see now, particularly in the development of games but this is something that we can work towards fairly quickly now with film and TV as well, is that in the games effectively it’s immersive theater. There’ll be characters who’ll be having a conversation, a dialog, but you’ll come across it as a player and before you interact with these characters, you can just stand and watch or ignore them or interact with them and change the narrative.

Mike Horton: And they’re actually doing that right now. I just saw some of that last week at 20th Century Fox, so they’re actually doing that kind of stuff.

Maxim Jago: But now what I want to see is the acquisition of dynamically generated 3D models of actors as they act in a set so that you generate a 3D model of the environment and that becomes the 3D space in which the user is navigating and then you place the actors in that environment with cameras in every direction observing them, taking that data, building it into a 3D model of the actors and placing them in the virtual space for the viewer so that as a viewer, there could be an argument going on between two people in a room and you can walk around the room, stand next to them, go and stand somewhere else. You have an incredibly immersive experience. We have the technology for this, it’s just difficult at the moment.

Larry Jordan: Interesting. Maxim, where can people go on the web to learn more about the kind of projects and things you’re working on?

Maxim Jago: Well, I’m revamping my website, but maximjago.com is the place to go.

Larry Jordan: That’s maximjago.com and Maxim Jago himself is the face you’re looking at. Maxim, thanks for joining us today.

Maxim Jago: Thank you, Larry, it’s a real pleasure. Thanks for having me.

Larry Jordan: Take care.

Mike Horton: Thanks Maxim.

Larry Jordan: See you soon. Bye bye.

Larry Jordan: I want to invite you to become a member of our video training library. Our training library is unique in the industry. It includes more than 1400 in depth movies, each accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Every movie in our library can be streamed to any internet connected device and it includes production and post production hardware, software and techniques. It features current and past software releases from both Apple and Adobe and, unlike YouTube, all our training is complete and, unlike other websites, we focus exclusively on media production and post production.

Larry Jordan: Best of all, our memberships are affordable, starting at only $19.99 per month. Focused, in depth, accessible and complete. This is the training that you need to solve problems, master new software and expand your business. I invite you to become a member today. Thanks.

Larry Jordan: Welcome to Tech Talk.

Larry Jordan: That’s the back-up process also straightforward, but how do I get stuff back? You click on the ‘R’ for restore and you click on ‘Search’. I want to search all of my archives and I want to search for a file that has the name ‘girl’ in it, and click on ‘Search’. It says, “I found this. I’ve got Girl Dancing on Bridge, we’ve got girls on a carousel.” I want to recover the girls on a carousel, so I check it – I could check multiple files – and then we can add it.

Larry Jordan: Once it’s been added, close this window and now it’s said “Go to, find this file. It’s stored at that location – think of it as a timecode – on volume number one in a set called Back-up 25.” This is the stuff that we’ve done. Now click on ‘Restore’ and it says, “Go for it.” Put in tape number one and you’ll never guess – right. It’s got to cue the tape, so let’s go fast forward and get the tape. Cue to the right spot and restore the file.

Larry Jordan: The file itself that we’re recovering is about 450 megabytes. At the speed the tape plays back, it’s going to take three seconds to pull it off the tape. In fact, we can see that the restoration is complete and this time I don’t have to wait for the rewind, because notice that there’s our girl on carousel laid to the hard drive and there’s the kids that we just recovered from the tape.

Larry Jordan: Very cool and the nice thing is that, yes, it takes a little bit of time but I know with absolute certainty that that which is on my hard disk as the master, when it got laid to the tape, is accurate and when it came back, it’s equally accurate because of the verification process that all tape drives use.

Larry Jordan: Filmmaker Max Votolato has lived in Los Angeles for 14 years, holding staff jobs at a number of major media companies around town. He’s originally from South London, though, and a graduate of the London College of Communication’s Film and Video Program. His latest film, ‘Freeway City,’ is the story of Gardena, California, the onetime poker capital of the world. Hello, Max, welcome.

Mike Horton: Is it?

Max Votolato: Hi, Larry, how are you?

Larry Jordan: We are delighted to be talking with you. I was just thinking, graduating from the London College of Communications is a big deal. What first got you interested in making films?

Max Votolato: I grew up in South London. My neighbor as a kid was Terry Jones, movie director, part of Monty Python, and Terry’s son Bill is around my age and we had class together so we took Terry’s Super 8 camera out and later his Video 8 camera and made our first films together in the neighborhood and that was my first foray into filmmaking. It’s funny, other neighbors in this community were also involved with media, and another neighbor named … who had a company named … Films, made documentaries for Channel 4 in London, so as a teenager I was his trainee and I would go out on these shoots and learn about documentary filmmaking.

Max Votolato: The London College of Communications used to be called the London College of Printing when I went through it, but it’s not a printing school, it’s just a media school, and they had a very documentary approach too, so somehow I’ve always been involved in documentary.

Larry Jordan: Well, your most recent film is ‘Freeway City,’ and we’re going to talk about that in just a minute, but you’ve also done a number of other documentaries. What are some of your past projects?

Max Votolato: There was a project called ‘Italian Americans in Federal Hill’ and, similar to ‘Freeway City’, it was about the community of Federal Hill. I was an associate producer on the project and I shot many of the interviews, so that was almost a training ground for doing this project. It was one of the early inspirations to do a feature length documentary like this. But more recently, I worked on a series called ‘On Patrol,’ which was all about the cops in Santa Barbara. It was a police ride along reality program, docu-style also, and it’s now on Hulu but you can see that it’s another documentary project chronicling the Santa Barbara PD.

Max Votolato: I’ve also worked on the series ‘Cosmos: A Space Time Odyssey.’ I was a unit manager on that show and that was great experience for learning how to make documentaries for broadcast, and deal with the clearances and all the other intricacies of getting films broadcast ready. Also I produced a short film for Jason Clark, who’s the producer of the ‘Ted’ movies. He was also producer on ‘Cosmos’ for the Breakthrough Initiatives Group. That was my most recent work.

Larry Jordan: What is it about documentaries that appeals to you as opposed to narrative or fiction?

Max Votolato: Well, I’m a big fan of the format because it’s something I can do myself. I wanted to make movies and didn’t have the financial resources to do a big narrative film or a dramatization of one of the ideas I have, so I can be a one man band and go out with my own camera and interview people and then almost do the post production alone too, so it’s an accessible format.

Larry Jordan: All right, well let’s talk about your newest project, which is ‘Freeway City.’ I love the subtitle, which is The One Time Poker Capital of the World. How can you not love a subtitle like that? What was it about the story that attracted you?

Max Votolato: Well, a lot of things. I wanted to make a film about Los Angeles. I was very inspired by the Mike Davis City of… and I was looking to tell a story about Los Angeles. It’s funny, I discovered… inadvertently. I was making another film about the Southern California bail bond scheme and one of the bail agents who I was profiling, a guy named Francisco Rodriguez, has a company called Hollywood Bail Bonds and it’s not in Hollywood, it’s in Gardena, so I started spending a lot of time in the area and his unofficial office is a bar called the Desert…, Gardena Boulevard, so this became one of our key hangouts and it was instrumental to ‘Freeway City’ because it started to build the network for the film in terms of the community and hearing the stories and the history of Gardena.

Max Votolato: I didn’t know about Gardena and when I tell these stories to friends, things that I was picking up, nobody else had heard about the history of Gardena. There are some poker clubs still there now, but at one time it was a major poker destination with six clubs and it was one of the only places in California you could play legally. It’s not just a poker story, it’s a chronological history, probably 85 years, of the city since it was incorporated and I think it touches on a lot of things and is SoCal centric and it’s an original untold story, so to me it was just a great opportunity.

Larry Jordan: So what is the story? Give us the one paragraph version of the plot.

Max Votolato: Well, Gardena was many things to many people. In the early days, it was an agricultural community that was white and Japanese American and then Pearl Harbor happened, there was the internment of the Japanese Americans and the post-war Gardena started. It made the city a very different place. Poker clubs came in. They’d already been there before the war but that’s when the poker community got very strong there and then you have this whole battle that went on between the clubs.

Max Votolato: Then in the late ’60s, the Japanese American story became very important to the city because Gardena became a gateway to Japanese corporations that wanted to come to the United States. Some big corporations like Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hitachi all made their entrance into the United States through Gardena because the city’s leadership was Japanese American and spoke the language and they were able to impart our culture and customs and show the Japanese corporations coming into America how our society works. So it was a big selling point to them and it became an area where they set up their formal US headquarters in the early days.

Larry Jordan: So as you were making the film, how many people did you interview and did you do it all yourself? What kind of gear? Talk about the production process for a minute.

Max Votolato: I interviewed 35 people and they were all about two to three hour interviews. I shot the film on a Sony FX1, which is an HDV camcorder which uses Mini DV tape. My process when I do these interviews is I set the camera up and then I sit by the camera and do the interview and so very simple, the interviewees were miked with a Lavalier and it was wired to camera. I missed shooting with tape; solid state maybe is not always as reliable as those old tapes were. So it was very simple and usually it was a sit down interview but on occasion I went out in a car or would be walking with someone, so again very run and gun style.

Max Votolato: Then I posted the film in Final Cut Pro mostly. In the beginning, I started in Final Cut Pro 5 and then the project graduated with the new releases, so it went to 6 and 7 and then ultimately brought it into Adobe Creative Cloud for the finishing. But that was when the film was really built. I didn’t do an .xml export to bring it into Premiere, I took it out as one big chunk of video and then I did the sound work and my titles.

Larry Jordan: Now, one of the things I was very impressed with is you did not only a lot of B-roll and a lot of Ken Burns style moves on still images, but a lot of historical footage. How did you find the historical footage and what’s the licensing process like?

Max Votolato: It came from a lot of sources. Most of the footage was from the Prelinger Archives, so it’s public domain footage and that’s always the battle when you’re doing these things, because you want to get away from the talking heads as much as possible and give the story momentum and there is no footage of these card clubs. Now it’s hard to bring a camera into a casino, it’s always a problem, so when I could I’d find archival footage that matched the stories and gave me kinetic stare, but then many times it was just photographs that I’d have or maps or headlines and I’d have to make them move, just film some energy and get away from those talking heads.

Max Votolato: I got my first round of photographs from the City of Gardena. They had done a project with a company called Arcadia Publishing and they publish these, you see them in Barnes & Noble, books about small towns… together a heritage community and they go across the country, so they’d done a lot of the work compiling their pictorial history of the city and that gave me a head start. But even book that didn’t have a lot of pictures of casinos or card clubs, so I was able through my interviewees to get pictures.

Max Votolato: There was one interviewee in particular, Blaine Nicholson, who had been publicist for Ernie…, who’s kind of the central figure in the story of the card clubs, and he had an amazing archive of photographs that he’d just scrapbooked, and he had photo albums and we shot a three hour interview at his home in San Diego, and at the end of it he pulled out these boxes and it was like everything I’d never seen before but had heard of. So I sat for two hours with a scanner at his coffee table, and we scanned these images together and he talked me through them, gave me notes on who the people in the photographs were, and when these pictures were taken and that was a huge resource.

Max Votolato: Toyota gave me access to their photo archive. A lot of it had to do with the early days of that company in the United States. So there were plenty of pictures of the area from there, and they even had film of their original cars being tested, old car commercials and things like that. There’s a gentleman in the film, George Castro, who’s a photographer for the City of Gardena and many of his pictures are in the film too. I was lucky to work with some really talented After Effects artists who were able to make those pictures come alive and that’s a lot of what you see also in those sequences.

Larry Jordan: I notice the film is online and for people who are watching, they can see the website, it’s freewaycity.org. But what are your plans for distribution and are you hoping to make money on this or is this a project for love?

Max Votolato: In the beginning, it was a different world in terms of distribution. I had big dreams about coming out on DVD. This has been a long time project, I’ve been doing this on and off for ten years, I started in 2005, and I’ve worked these jobs and done this in my own time. So it’s taken a long time to get it across the finish line.

Max Votolato: Maybe it still does have a chance with distribution. To me at this point, it’s more important for the film to be seen, and I’ve noticed that filmmakers are starting to use Vimeo that way just to get eyeballs on your film, and the outreach through Facebook and other social media tools to bring an audience to the film is incredible. I’m finding my audience online now and getting their feedback and it’s a real pleasure.

Larry Jordan: So now that you’ve got this one toward the finish line, what are you working on next? Or are you just going to take a long nap?

Max Votolato: No, no, I’m very excited about this project and I feel that there’s another film in there. There was so much that didn’t make it into this cut of ‘Freeway City’ that I’m very optimistic about another documentary, and maybe even a dramatization of some of these stories.

Larry Jordan: That could be fun. What website can people go to who want to see the film?

Max Votolato: The film is on freewaycity.org and you can follow the film also on Twitter, @freewaycityfilm, and my personal Twitter is @votolato.

Larry Jordan: And Max Votolato is the producer, director, writer, researcher, camera and editor for ‘Freeway City.’ Max, thanks for talking with us, I wish you great success with the film.

Max Votolato: Thanks very much. Thanks for having me.

Larry Jordan: Take care. Bye bye.

Larry Jordan: It’s time for a Buzz Flashback. Five years ago today…

Matt Katsolis (archive): In the Western world, we so often feel that we have excess income, excess resources. While we may have physical excess, they have spiritual excess, and by that I mean just that so many people there have so little yet are content. It’s a perspective shift and I’d say it’s a healthy perspective shift, just to really keep things in mind like, wow, we really do have it so good here and not to contribute to the noise.

Larry Jordan: This was a Buzz Flashback.

Larry Jordan: You know, Michael, it’s been an interesting show, starting with Sue and looking at everybody else that’s there.

Mike Horton: You know what was really interesting? We talked to two documentary filmmakers and they talked about how many years they’ve been working on their documentary. Do you know how long it takes to do a documentary, the average time from conception to end? I bet you don’t.

Larry Jordan: More than a year?

Mike Horton: Yes. It’s about seven years.

Larry Jordan: Seven?

Mike Horton: Seven years is the average from conception to end for a documentary filmmaker, and that’s a lot of discipline.

Larry Jordan: You have to care.

Mike Horton: Yes, you have to care.

Larry Jordan: And you could see it in their faces, you see how they light up as they were talking about it?

Mike Horton: Yes. I mean, what was Sue, 15 years? And this guy, ten years?

Larry Jordan: Yes, Sue was 12.

Mike Horton: The average time is about seven years.

Larry Jordan: 12 years and they haven’t even finished editorial yet. They’ve got at least a year of that.

Mike Horton: Yes, you’ve got to care about documentaries.

Larry Jordan: Yes, that’s why you don’t necessarily get into it, as Max was saying, to make money, because the distribution’s going to change in the ten years you’re working on the project.

Mike Horton: That’s the thing, it is going to change.

Larry Jordan: I want to thank our guests tonight that were making films, starting with Sue Lawson and Maxim Jago, both a director and a futurist, then Max Votolato, a filmmaker.

Larry Jordan: There’s a lot of history not only in the world, but in our industry and it’s all posted to our website, digitalproductionbuzz.com. Here you’ll find hundreds of shows and thousands of interviews and Mike stars in just about all of them. They’re all online, all available to you today.

Larry Jordan: Talk with us on Twitter, @DPBuZZ, and Facebook at digitalproductionbuzz.com. Our theme music is composed by Nathan Doogie Turner with additional music provided by smartsound.com. Text transcripts are provided by Take 1 Transcription – visit take1.tv to learn how they can help you.

Larry Jordan: Our producer is Cirina Catania; our engineering team is lead by Megan Paulos and includes Ed Golya, Keegan Guy, James Miller and Brianna Murphy. On behalf Mike Horton, the handsome guy on the other side of the table, my name’s Larry Jordan and thanks for joining us for The Digital Production Buzz.

Mike Horton: Goodnight, everybody.

Announcer #1: The Digital Production Buzz was brought to you by Other World Computing, providing quality hardware solutions and extensive technical support to the worldwide computer industry since 1988; and by Blackmagic Design, creating revolutionary solutions for film, post production and television.

Digital Production Buzz – December 10, 2015

Join Larry Jordan and Mike Horton as they talk with Sue Lawson, Maxim Jago, and Max Votolato.

View Show Transcript

Watch the Full Episode

Tech Talk
With Larry Jordan
 

Buzz on YouTubeTranscript

Listen to the Full Episode


Buzz on iTunesTranscript

Guests this Week

Sue Lawson
Sue Lawson, Editor, Chicago Edit
Sue Lawson is an award-winning, Chicago-based editor of corporate videos and feature films with a passion for preserving digital media. Recently, she associate produced and edited a documentary on guerrilla film preservation called Reel Heroes. Tonight she describes the project and how to preserve media for the long-term.
Maxim Jago
Maxim Jago, Director, MaximJago.com
Maxim Jago is an award-winning director who is thinking about the future of media. We are already moving to 4K, but what about 8K, or more colors, or the impact of HDR? Discover where the future is taking us, tonight, on The Buzz.
Max Votolato
Max Votolato, Director/Producer/Editor/Researcher, Freeway City
Originally from South London, filmmaker Max Votolato has lived in Los Angeles for 14 years creating dozens of film and television credits. His newest documentary is called Freeway City, which is the story of Gardena, California, the One-Time Poker Capital of the World. Tonight, he shares what he did and how he did it.

Transcript: Digital Production Buzz – December 3, 2015

Digital Production Buzz

December 3, 2015

[Transcripts provided by Take 1 Transcription]

(Click here to listen to this show.)

HOSTS
Larry Jordan
Mike Horton

SEGMENTS
Randi Altman’s Perspective
Tech Talk with Larry Jordan
BuZZ Flashback: Andy Howard

GUESTS
Patrick Southern, Assistant Editor
Christina Horgan, Post Sound Editor, Fire Lotus Productions & Dog House Post Audio
Charles Dautremont, CEO/CTO, Cinedeck
===

Larry Jordan: Tonight on The Buzz, Patrick Southern is an editor who’s spent the last year cutting documentaries for A&E, National Geographic and the Lifetime Movie Network. Tonight, he joins us live in the studio to tell us what it takes to be a successful editor.

Larry Jordan: Next, Christina Horgan began as a graphics designer, then she became an award winning sound editor. She’s worked on feature films, television and the web. She’s a member of the Motion Picture Sound Editors Guild and tonight she explains what we need to know to capture great sound during production.

Larry Jordan: Next, Cinedeck has a very cool solution to the problem of replacing only a portion of an existing video, called an Insert Edit. Charles Dautremont, the CEO of Cinedeck, explains how it works.

Larry Jordan: All this plus Tech Talk, a Buzz Flashback and Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News. The Buzz starts now.

Announcer #1: Tonight’s Digital Production Buzz is brought to you by Other World Computing at macsales.com; and by Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Announcer #2: Since the dawn of digital filmmaking… Authoritative…one show serves a worldwide network of media professionals… Current…uniting industry experts… Production…filmmakers… Post production…and content creators around the planet. Distribution. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now. From the media capital of the world in Los Angeles, California, The Digital Production Buzz goes live now.

Larry Jordan: And welcome to the Digital Production Buzz, the world’s longest running podcast for creative content producers covering media production, post production and marketing around the world. Good to have you with us. Mike?

Mike Horton: Hmm?

Larry Jordan: Do you know what the big news was this week, the really, really big news, the news that everybody and their cousin knows about?

Mike Horton: Hmm. Michael Horton’s back after two weeks?

Larry Jordan: Well, that’s true. It’s good to have you back, by the way. We’ve missed you in that chair.

Mike Horton: Thank you. Usually you say that.

Larry Jordan: Well, this news is so big it even preempts that.

Mike Horton: I didn’t want anybody to miss it. Hi, everybody, I’m back. Thank you. It’s great to be back.

Larry Jordan: With you gone, I didn’t realize it was…

Mike Horton: Adobe did something, right?

Larry Jordan: We can’t take you anywhere, can we?

Mike Horton: They released something.

Larry Jordan: They did, they released updates to Premiere and Audition.

Mike Horton: I haven’t checked my updates, I haven’t done anything. Are they big updates or just little bug fixes?

Larry Jordan: These are big updates. These are the ones they announced at IBC.

Mike Horton: Oh, and I saw those at the Supermeet.

Larry Jordan: There are two really cool features. One is a remix feature inside Audition, which allows us to make music of any length that we want so we can retime a show and have it be slightly longer without having any change in audio quality.

Mike Horton: Mmm, we can talk to Christina Horgan about that, right?

Larry Jordan: We should, and she’s coming up a little bit later. But the big one is that Premiere now supports 4K and 8K editing and HDR video, and between the two of them I think HDR is going to have a bigger impact.

Mike Horton: Have you been doing anything with HDR? I know you talk about it a lot.

Larry Jordan: No, because there’s nothing I have that allows me to shoot it or edit it. But now we can.

Mike Horton: I know you talk about it a lot. Do you even do anything?

Larry Jordan: It’s like we see the Promised Land and we can’t get there. We’re like Moses, we’re prevented, we just can’t get across. Well, now we can. Premiere makes HDR editing possible, which is really cool. I know you’ve played with these. What do you think?

Mike Horton: I don’t play with these. Hey, listen, I’ve had a tough two weeks. I didn’t even know the damn updates were out until you told me.

Larry Jordan: I will send you a memo next time.

Mike Horton: No, but I did see them at IBC, that’s the thing, so now that they’re out I want to play with them, so thank you. I will play with them.

Larry Jordan: I want a report on my desk next week.

Mike Horton: It’s one of the perks of doing this job, folks, is I find out what’s going on when I come in to the office.

Larry Jordan: And the way that he finds out is he’s a subscriber to the Digital Production Buzz newsletter. Every issue every Friday gives people like Mike an inside look at both The Buzz and the industry. Mike and I, by the way, are going to be right back with Patrick Southern after we hear from Randi Altman’s Perspective on the News.

Larry Jordan: This is Randi Altman’s Perspective.

Larry Jordan: Randi Altman has been writing about our industry for more than 20 years. In fact, she’s the editor in chief of her own website at postperspective.com and I always like every week getting her take on what’s happening inside the industry. Hello, Randi, welcome.

Randi Altman: Hi Larry, thanks for having me back.

Larry Jordan: So what’s the big news this week?

Randi Altman: Well, I think the big news is that Adobe has finally released all of the enhancements and upgrades they’ve made to their Creative Suite, the stuff that they were showing in Amsterdam at IBC and stuff that they were showing at their own Adobe Max, so it’s out there for the taking now.

Larry Jordan: Well, I know you’re going to be talking to a lot of people to find out what’s going on, but from your perspective what’s your sense of where Adobe is headed?

Randi Altman: I think they’re headed to the high end and I think this new release and these new products make that pretty clear. At Adobe Max, their own conference, they were showing native 8K editing, thanks to Dell workstations and Nvidia cards. They are really taking advantage of the GPU and also they’ve made additions to their editing product and After Effects as well, so I think they want the high end and that’s pretty clear.

Larry Jordan: Well, Adobe made the big news this week, but what else is happening in the industry that’s caught your attention?

Randi Altman: This week, Assimilate announced a new version of their Scratch. It’s 8.4. While Simulate is still being used in color suites, what they’re also doing is bringing the product on set and that’s pretty important to what they’re offering with this new release and going forward. So DITs are going to be using it in various ways on set and also they have Scratch Web, so real time via the cloud. I think that they’re one of those companies that realizes you can’t just be one thing and they’re adding to their ecosystem, so that’s big news.

Larry Jordan: I was just thinking that Assimilate’s not the only company that’s moved their tools to be on set as opposed to in post. What’s driving this trend to putting more post tools on set?

Randi Altman: I think it’s about efficiency. I think that it’s also about tighter deadlines and less budgets, so I think there has to be a very clear and efficient path from set to post and that’s what’s been happening. It started a few years ago, but the march continues.

Larry Jordan: Randi, I look forward to talking with you again next week. What website can people visit who want to learn more about you and the stuff you’re writing about?

Randi Altman: Postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: And Randi Altman is the editor in chief of postperspective.com. Randi, as always, thanks for joining us today.

Randi Altman: Thank you, Larry.

Larry Jordan: To read more from Randi Altman, visit postperspective.com.

Larry Jordan: When you’re working with media, one thing is essential – your computer needs peak performance. However, when it comes to upgrading your Mac, there are so many different options to choose from that the process can be confusing. That’s why Other World Computing carries the best upgrades that lets your computer performance and storage grow as your needs grow.

Larry Jordan: Since 1988, OWC has become one of the most trusted names in quality hardware and comprehensive support to the worldwide computer industry. With an extensive online catalog of Mac, iPhone and iPad enhancement products, as well as a dedicated team of knowledgeable experts providing first rate tech support, OWC has everything you need to take your current system to the next level. Whether you need to maximize your system’s memory, add blazing speed or enhance reliability, look no further than the friendly experts at OWC. Learn more by visiting macsales.com today.

Larry Jordan: Patrick Southern is a freelance assistant editor who has recently worked on documentaries for A&E, National Geographic and the Lifetime Movie Network. Hello, Patrick, welcome.

Patrick Southern: Hey, Larry, thanks for having me.

Larry Jordan: I have done my homework. You were born and raised in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Patrick Southern: That’s true, yes.

Larry Jordan: This is not a media centric environment. What got you interested in editing from there?

Patrick Southern: Interestingly enough, my father was a photographer and originally I wanted to be a cinematographer. I wanted to put images in motion, and I went to college at Oral Roberts University and got a degree in multimedia and moved out to Los Angeles to become a cinematographer and quickly found out that there are many people who are better at that than I.

Mike Horton: Did you come out to Los Angeles with no connections at all?

Patrick Southern: No connections. Well, I say that, I had one connection. I had worked at an Apple store in Oklahoma and I worked in the one to one program, which is a training program, and I taught Final Cut and Logic and a few other applications and one of my students happened to have a son in law who had a brother.

Mike Horton: So there is a connection.

Patrick Southern: There’s my connection.

Mike Horton: Who had a cousin.

Patrick Southern: Right, absolutely. So I met him and he was my only connection, but I didn’t have any work when I first came out here so my wife and I actually started working as not even extras. We were audience members, paid audience members for various studios in town.

Mike Horton: Seriously, there’s a job like that?

Patrick Southern: There is.

Mike Horton: I didn’t even know that.

Patrick Southern: Yes, $8 an hour and when there are two of you and you get free food, it’s a pretty great gig.

Larry Jordan: Yes, it takes care of lunch for that day.

Patrick Southern: It absolutely does, yes.

Larry Jordan: Well, you were teaching one on one at the Apple store in Tulsa. Is that where you got your training on the editing tools you used, or did you have mentors or take classes? What did you do?

Patrick Southern: It was kind of a mix. In college, we learned Avid and then I worked at the University’s media department for a while and learned Final Cut 7 there and then became certified in 7 at the Apple store. Then shortly thereafter they released X and everybody hated it, including myself at the time, but I still had to teach it so I got certified in X and noted very quickly that when it came to teaching Final Cut 7, it took a lot longer to get a concept across than when teaching Final Cut X.

Patrick Southern: In fact, there was an 80 year old woman who came in and she’d been learning iMovie and everybody accuses Final Cut of looking like iMovie Pro, which is a valid argument I suppose, but she went from learning iMovie to being able to ingest, organize, edit, do some color grading, effects and titling and sharing a movie all within an hour. I thought that was very interesting. So I moved out here with that training, not knowing cinematography, learned I was not so great at cinematography and then started pursuing editing from there.

Larry Jordan: What kind of projects are you working on currently? You’ve been here, what, a year? And you’re working for A&E and you’re working for Lifetime Movie Network and you’re working for National Geographic? Editors who have been here for ten years would kill for gigs like that.

Patrick Southern: That they would. I’ve been here for three years, but just the last year has been in television. Again, started out doing audience work and then the one contact that I had here in LA ended up getting me a job at a creative firm in Burbank and I worked there for about a year and a half, went through some training at a place called the Power Edit Academy and…

Mike Horton: The what?

Patrick Southern: The Power Edit Academy.

Mike Horton: Let me Google that for a second. Is it legit?

Patrick Southern: It is legit, yes.

Mike Horton: All right.

Patrick Southern: There’s a gentleman named Jeff Bartsch who works in reality television.

Mike Horton: Oh, I know Jeff.

Patrick Southern: You know Jeff?

Mike Horton: Yes, Jeff’s great.

Patrick Southern: He’s a great guy. I read his book, Edit Better, while I was working at the creative firm and thought, “Man, this is some great content.”

Mike Horton: Oh, this place. Ok, all right, ok.

Larry Jordan: Is that ok? Can he go to school there?

Mike Horton: It’s legit.

Larry Jordan: Ok, good. We’re continuing.

Patrick Southern: So I met up with Jeff to talk about his book and he said, “I’ve got this thing called the Power Edit Academy,” so I took his class and at the end of his class we’d gone through a number of things in terms of non-scripted editing and he did this great presentation trying to encourage us and so without having any jobs lined up, yet again I left my solid job at the creative firm and about three or four weeks later the one contact I had – his name’s Sam Sullivant – he happened to work on a movie called Focus and…

Larry Jordan: Not the Will Smith film?

Patrick Southern: Oh, the Will Smith film, yes. He worked on the Will Smith film with Mike Matzdorff and so I got to know Mike Matzdorff through Sam Sullivant, who is the brother of the son in law of the lady that I taught at the Apple store in Tulsa and through Mike I was able to get this job on ‘OJ Speaks and The Secret Tapes of the OJ Case with Chuck Braverman.’

Mike Horton: Yes, all of a sudden you became something of an evangelist for Final Cut X, at least in social media. On Facebook posts, on Twitter posts, it’s all Patrick Southern talking about the positive things about Final Cut Pro X.

Larry Jordan: Well, share some of those. What makes you excited about Final Cut X? I’m a little biased, I think Final Cut X is kind of cool, but you’re working in the trenches and I’m teaching it, so what do you like about it?

Patrick Southern: There are a number of things. Probably the first thing that got me working in Final Cut X was the ease of use with the magnetic timeline. A lot of people buck and fight against it, but I feel like there’s a lot in the magnetic timeline that is extremely useful. Switching shots around is super easy.

Patrick Southern: I remember in Final Cut 7, you had the F keys, F11, F12 and F9, I think, were your insert and overwrite and replace, I don’t even remember at this point, and I always had trouble because I always wanted to change the brightness on my computer and having to hold function got a little bit weary, so having Q, W, E and D now to do my primary edit functions into the timeline, I loved.

Patrick Southern: And now, having worked a year in non-scripted, one of the things that I’ve come to love is Lumberjack and a very little known feature of Lumberjack, the Transcript Mode, so the ability to take your transcript and then tie it to your footage in Final Cut and search within the browser and the timeline index has been amazing. I’m a very, very big fan of that tool.

Mike Horton: I’m sure Philip and Greg are watching right now. It’ll make them feel good.

Larry Jordan: I was just thinking, you came to LA, you knew exactly one person, you took a course, you met another person and clearly the way that people get jobs anywhere, not just in LA, is the people that know them and know of them. But there’s also marketing involved. How do you go about marketing yourself? How do you tell the world that you’re here and what’s worked and what hasn’t?

Patrick Southern: That’s a great question. A lot of it does start out as word of mouth, but oddly enough I met Mike Matzdorff originally through Twitter, so of all things he was on Twitter talking about Final Cut and he said, “Yes, I just worked on this movie for Warner Bros,” and I said, “Oh, I had a friend who worked on a movie at Warner Bros in Final Cut as well,” and I told him that it was my friend Sam and he said, “Oh, Sam Messman?” and I said, “No, not Sam Messman.”

Patrick Southern: Oddly enough, I found that Twitter and Facebook have been the two tools that I have got the most work through in the last year, which is very different, so as odd as it may seem, hashtagging things #FCPX, and then searching through that thread and looking for other people who are interested can help you tie into a network of people who assist or edit in Final Cut, and there have been situations where somebody that I’ve met through Twitter or Facebook hasn’t been able to do a job and has said, “Hey, would you like to potentially do this job?” and I usually say, “Yes, absolutely.”

Larry Jordan: You principally do assistant editor work as opposed to editing and there’s a big difference between what editors do and what assistant editors do. How would you describe the role of the assistant editor and when you’re assigned to a gig for the first time, what do you do? What’s your workflow?

Patrick Southern: That’s a great question. In terms of the difference between an editor and an assistant, I feel it’s a very catch-22 situation becoming an assistant because you’re both expected to be the person who knows the most about the application and also it’s your one way into post production, so you have to know all of the ins and outs of the software – or at least seemingly so – and then when it comes to editing you have to know story inside and out.

Patrick Southern: So assistant editing is very, very technical in terms of you need to know how to make a multicam clip, you need to know how to troubleshoot the software if something breaks, you need to know how to be able to organize the footage and get it to a place where the editor doesn’t have to think about all the technical stuff so that when it comes to working with the footage, they’re simply thinking of story.

Mike Horton: Do assistant editors ever once in a while go into the editor’s room when he’s having problems and actually fix his computer and fix his application and fix the problem that he’s having?

Patrick Southern: Oh yes.

Mike Horton: Do they really?

Patrick Southern: Maybe not all assistant editors but, yes, I don’t know of an editor that I’ve worked with for more than a week that hasn’t asked me to come in and, “Hey, my computer’s acting slow.”

Mike Horton: You can hear the editor in the other room, “God!” And you know exactly what you have to do – got to go in there and fix his computer.

Patrick Southern: Yes. Oh, there’s a lot of that, and being that all of the stuff I’ve worked on so far has been Final Cut X, a lot of editors I’m working with, it’s their first time working with Final Cut X, so they’ll often start out with me in the room with them and, “Hey, Patrick, how do you do this again?”

Larry Jordan: But is it principally a technical hat that you wear? Do you ever make a creative decision?

Patrick Southern: There are times when I will help with the creative process. For example, on ‘OJ Speaks’…

Mike Horton: You were an editor on that, right?

Patrick Southern: I was an assistant, but with the producer we did the first assembly, so before the editor ever got any of the material, Tom Jennings and I went through and we laid out the entire story beginning to end and it was about four hours longer than what you see on television; and then David Tillman, the editor, would come through and shorten things. I have since done editing for Tom at his company, but I was principally an assistant on that project.

Larry Jordan: But, again, as an assistant, you’re expected really to organize the media ingest and output and keep track of everything, keep the equipment working, but not necessarily to contribute creatively. Is that a true statement?

Patrick Southern: You’re not expected to do that as part of your responsibilities, but there are times when somebody will ask your opinion or say, “Hey, I could use help with maybe finding some moments,” so there are opportunities in terms of finding footage and knowing where footage is or what might potentially go well in a story that you can contribute creatively without forcing yourself on the editor.

Mike Horton: Are you confident in your abilities as a storyteller?

Patrick Southern: I’m not a Tom Jennings or a Chuck Braverman or a David Tillman, but I’m fairly confident. I did spend a year and a half at the creative firm as a producer and an editor, so I am fairly confident in my storytelling, yes.

Larry Jordan: Ok, so let’s put your assistant editor hat back on. The biggest challenge that somebody has is how they get organized for a Final Cut X edit. I’ve just dumped a basketful of camera cards on you and you’ve got an empty RAID, you’ve got a brand new computer, the software’s installed. How do you set it up?

Patrick Southern: Basically, first thing I always do is use ShotPut Pro to move everything onto the new drive so that I make sure I’ve got my checksums, I want to make sure that the transfer took place safely, and then usually there’s some sort of organization that’s communicated between me and the editor – “Here are the story beats that we expect the story is going to have” – and so we’ll break it down into events. A lot of Final Cut editors like working in one event.

Patrick Southern: Everybody that I’ve worked with, we’ve done multiple events for the different kinds of footage, whether it be archival footage, archival audio, so forth and so on; and then within that, we will use keyword collections and I took a cue from Philip and Greg with Lumberjack and have decided that I like creating folders for people, places, activities and then if there are any other logical collections of keywords that I can put together, then I’ll create a folder for that.

Patrick Southern: So I’ve got my keyword collections that I may not even have tagged anything with and I’ll go ahead and set those up within folders and then, as we’re watching through footage, you apply your keyword collections so that footage will start to fill into those collections.

Larry Jordan: And you store the media all on a single RAID and you’ve got it all on a single device or do you have it across multiple hard disks? And is there an organizational pattern there as well?

Mike Horton: It depends on the budget, Larry.

Patrick Southern: It really does depend on the budget. Some budgets, we’ll do a mirrored drive.

Mike Horton: Oh wow.

Patrick Southern: If you don’t have a whole lot of money, then the mirrored drive is one way to go; and then the way that I prefer to work is with Sam Messman’s Share Station where everything’s all on shared storage. You’ve got a nice RAID that is then backing up to an additional drive.

Mike Horton: That thing is powerful and it’s a beauty.

Larry Jordan: So as you’re looking forward, what projects are you looking to do in the future?

Patrick Southern: Oh, that’s a great question. Right now, documentaries is the place for me. I enjoy the speed of the work.

Mike Horton: And you can also change the world with that wonderful story if you get lucky enough to be involved in that wonderful story.

Patrick Southern: Oh yes, absolutely.

Mike Horton: Only documentary. I love it.

Patrick Southern: Yes, me too.

Larry Jordan: Patrick, thanks for joining us today. Patrick Southern is an editor and an assistant editor working in Final Cut and a variety of other tools, based in LA and, Patrick, it’s been fun chatting today. Thank you very much.

Patrick Southern: Thank you, Larry.

Mike Horton: Thank you.

Larry Jordan: Take care.

Patrick Southern: Thanks, Mike.

Larry Jordan: The folks at Blackmagic Design keep shaking up the industry. The new DaVinci Resolve 12 could be all the video editor you need. DaVinci Resolve 12 combines professional non-linear video editing with the world’s most advanced color corrector, so now you can edit, color correct, finish and deliver all from one system.

Larry Jordan: The brand new Blackmagic Video Assist is a high resolution professional monitor and recorder that allows you to see a full pixel 1080 image large enough so you can focus a DSLR camera accurately; and the new URSA Mini cameras provide stunning quality with a 4.6K sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range, compact, lightweight and built from advanced magnesium alloy.

Larry Jordan: When it comes to state of the art technology, look first at Blackmagic Design at blackmagicdesign.com.

Larry Jordan: Christina Horgan began her career in graphic design, then she transitioned into sound design and sound editing. Since then, she’s won Best Sound Design at the 2015 FANtastic Horror Film Festival, as well as becoming a member of the Motion Picture Sound Editors Guild. Hello, Christina, welcome.

Christina Horgan: Hi, Larry, thank you for having me.

Larry Jordan: I’ve been looking forward to this conversation all week. I’m really glad that you’re here because I’m puzzled. You started off as a graphics designer and then you transitioned into sound design and I can’t think of a single piece of connection between graphics design and sound design. Why did you make…

Mike Horton: I’ll give you a piece of it. Do you know who developed the LAFCPUG website?

Larry Jordan: No way!

Mike Horton: She did. She designed it. There’s your graphic design. Then, because she was interested in editing at that time, she got involved in the user group. On day one, she did the LAFCPUG design, which is the same 15 years later.

Larry Jordan: She may not really want you to mention this.

Mike Horton: I know.

Christina Horgan: Not because I wanted it to stay the same.

Mike Horton: No, no, it’s all my fault, it’s all my fault that it’s the same, but she did it. She did it because she was interested in editing and film and everything else. She took that graphic design background, which she’s brilliant at, and now she’s in sound.

Larry Jordan: But graphic design is visually based and audio is aurally based and generally the two of them don’t go hand in hand. What attracted you to it?

Christina Horgan: Well, I have to disagree. In my head, in my world, I can play a movie in my mind, whether it’s visual, but it’s got to have sound with it as well. I create from the same place and it depends on what you’re going for. If you’re going to create anything visually, you still have to come up with your concept and your ideas and so forth and it’s really the same with the sound. However, you have already a visual palette to work from.

Larry Jordan: So you see pictures in your head when you’re designing sound?

Christina Horgan: Yes. Don’t let that get out too much.

Mike Horton: She really is a sane woman. I know her well.

Christina Horgan: But yes, and colors. To me, sound has colors, it’s all of that and I just transitioned from one plane to the other and I can go back again.

Larry Jordan: Well, you’ve done both sound editing and sound design. Which do you prefer?

Christina Horgan: Sound design.

Larry Jordan: How come?

Christina Horgan: It’s creative and I am a creative person and an artist as well, and so it appeals to me. However, there’s a real satisfaction in cutting and editing. I do enjoy it, it’s very relaxing, good therapy. It just depends.

Mike Horton: You know, we talk to editors, especially some of the legendary editors, they all come from sound. They all started in sound and moved to picture. Why is that? Walter Murch, Dede Allen, all these brilliant editors started in sound.

Christina Horgan: Well, I’m backwards. I started from picture and I transitioned over to sound and I don’t think I’m going back, really. I love sound.

Mike Horton: I don’t know if it’s back.

Christina Horgan: I’ve always been kind of a nut for audio anyhow. I didn’t even know it when I was a kid and always messing around with my own thing, my own mixes. Remember the little cassette tapes? We would record and I had my amplifier and all my equalizers and I was always trying to do my own thing and absolutely loved it. Had no idea that there was a deeper thing going on there really, because I am artistic as well, so it was just easier to apply visual. But it took an economical crash for me to finally get to realize – I don’t come from a family that has anyone in the industry so right off the bat it was difficult to get into. Secondly, I’m female. I graduated from high school a long, long time ago and it was even tougher to get into unless you had family already in the industry.

Larry Jordan: So where did you study? Where did you learn your craft?

Christina Horgan: I learned at Video Symphony, an absolutely fantastic program. I took the Pro Tools program and all of the instructors there were top veterans – Vicky Sampson, Solange Schwalbe.

Mike Horton: Larry Jordan.

Christina Horgan: Larry Jordan, yes. But every aspect of audio. We went through an entire audio engineering program, so each aspect of post came later and we learned from all of the experts how to cut properly all the way to mixing. It gave you a taste of everything so that you could find your way. What you really thought you wanted to do when you came there might not be what you ended up wanting to do, actually.

Larry Jordan: Well, not only did you take the class, but you actually listened to what the instructors were talking about, because you won the award for Best Sound Design for Cut! Tell me what this is about.

Mike Horton: That was so cool because you had just been at my meeting, showing off Cut! and showing off her work, and then the next day she’s holding up a trophy from San Diego.

Christina Horgan: That’s true.

Mike Horton: I know, it really was, it was the next day or next two days.

Christina Horgan: A couple of days later, and honestly I was really surprised. I was already just really excited to be nominated, that alone was beyond any expectation, and the entries were really, all of them were great and…

Mike Horton: Well, that’s a hell of a film fest.

Christina Horgan: Yes, it was fantastic, it really was. But the Cut! sound design is a very fun story. I was able to collaborate with the director, David Rountree, on his ideal, what his vision was, and he allowed me to really pick his brain, and that’s something that is not normal. You don’t usually get to have any kind of collaboration on that level with most film directors, or even beyond your supervising sound editor, and Solange Schwalbe and Vicky Sampson were co-supervisors on the movie. Anyway, he had a specific feel for what he wanted. He wanted a lot of metal in his sound design and I guess you could go to a library, but that’s not real sound design.

Mike Horton: Yes, we had the talk earlier. Why not just go to a library and pick them out, especially when you have no budget?

Christina Horgan: Well, you would do that for hard effects, if you’re cutting sound effects, but if you’re creating sound design, which is a completely different animal, you want it to be original and unique. There might be some things you could pull from a library and elaborate on and modify them and tweak them, but true sound design is taking a concept and creating something that has not been created yet for that movie. Sound design is sounds that are not real to the world, especially horror films. That’s a great example. It’s the sounds that drive the emotion and make the hairs stand up on your arms and the back of your neck and the suspense that keeps your attention. With so many of those horror movies, the scripts are not really great.

Larry Jordan: Yes, it’s all in the audio.

Christina Horgan: So you have to be able to drive the story home with the sound design.

Larry Jordan: Do you record your own audio?

Christina Horgan: I do. If I have the use of a studio, that’s wonderful, but normally you don’t and in this case I didn’t.

Mike Horton: She’s got wonderful stories about creating the sound design for Cut!

Christina Horgan: Yes, I don’t have time to tell them all.

Mike Horton: I know, we only have about two and a half minutes, but you should bring her back just to tell that story. There are just a great, great stories when you have no money.

Larry Jordan: All right, tell me a story. What was it like?

Mike Horton: Quickly!

Christina Horgan: Quickly, it was done in my kitchen. Briefly, I didn’t have any mics. There’s no budget on this movie, first of all, and I didn’t have any mics worthy of something you would create. I was hoping to be able to borrow one from the school and you’re not supposed to do that, take it off the premises.

Christina Horgan: My kitchen was a disaster zone for three weeks, off limits, and everything was created and recorded in my kitchen directly into Pro Tools on my laptop, plugged in on the counter, and I ransacked a dumpster – and I’m not a dumpster diver – and I found a karaoke machine that had a little ten dollar mic that came with it that was still plugged into it and it was just a little cheap cardioid mic and I thought, “Hmm, I wonder if this thing works,” and found out it worked and I used that. I hung a guy wire across my kitchen and then looped this thing over and just slid it back and forth over whatever it was I needed to record so I could have use of all my hands. It was awful.

Mike Horton: Are we talking about a lot of sound effects in the movie or all of the sound effects in the movie?

Christina Horgan: All of it.

Mike Horton: All of it done in your kitchen with a ten dollar mic.

Christina Horgan: Yes, yes, and half the sound design was already done with that mic because it was so chintzy and so bad that I was just going to take it into Pro Tools and tweak and modify it and process it and do all the stuff to get all these scary sounds anyway.

Mike Horton: And you did process the sounds?

Christina Horgan: Oh yes. Otherwise they would just sound like a bunch of pots and pans and scrapes.

Mike Horton: Oh, ok. All right.

Christina Horgan: I won’t give all of it away.

Larry Jordan: You said it took you three weeks to record, at least your kitchen was trashed for three weeks. How long did it take you to design the audio itself?

Christina Horgan: Well, we had a lot of time on the film. We had probably a total of about six months that we worked on it. That wasn’t the original schedule.

Mike Horton: Six months in post?

Christina Horgan: Yes.

Mike Horton: Wow.

Christina Horgan: It got pushed. There’s no budget so it was easy. We were all invested in this movie, we loved this movie.

Mike Horton: And David’s such a nice guy, you want to do anything for him.

Christina Horgan: Exactly, he’s a great director and because of our dedication and investment in David Rountree, we’re his post team. I hope he makes a lot of movies.

Mike Horton: Well, he will. People like him and he’s talented, so he will.

Christina Horgan: He is talented. But, yes, we had a lot of time. It was just supposed to be two months and I would have still been finished, but because I had so much extra time, it allowed me to go back and do more and more, so there are layers and layers and layers of sound design.

Mike Horton: Are you proud of your work or could you go over it again and again and again?

Christina Horgan: No, I love it. I won’t touch it now it’s done.

Mike Horton: Ah, good for you.

Christina Horgan: This one’s done. But that is another thing about post – there’s not enough time to do things. These days, it’s just got to be done in two weeks’ time and we’re so used to that.

Mike Horton: No chance for it to breathe.

Christina Horgan: Right.

Mike Horton: No chance for you to breathe.

Christina Horgan: And it really does make a difference. Your award winning movies are the ones that really have the budget to employ a lot of editors and a lot of crew, or they have the budget to allow for the length of time to work on it, or both.

Larry Jordan: So what would you like to be doing in the future? What are the next couple of projects you’re hoping to get?

Mike Horton: Redesign the LAFCPUG website? Only kidding.

Christina Horgan: Now he brings that up. I’m not doing that any more. Anything to do with editing. I love post editing and I love sound design. I have to say I am not a big horror movie fan. If I’m going to go rent a movie, it’s usually not going to be that, but to work on them is an entirely different thing. I absolutely love it. I could just create sound design for horror movies all day long. Blood and guts and all that stuff.

Mike Horton: Blood and guts. Just don’t watch them.

Christina Horgan: Well, we don’t get the reels in chronological order.

Larry Jordan: And you get just to design it on your own. Christina, thank you so very much for joining us today.

Christina Horgan: My pleasure.

Larry Jordan: We will bring you back to hear more horror stories of horror films in the future.

Christina Horgan: Thank you, Larry.

Mike Horton: Horror stories of horror films, yes.

Larry Jordan: Take care. Thanks again.

Christina Horgan: Thank you for having me.

Larry Jordan: Welcome to Tech Talk.

Larry Jordan: When I’m editing 4K in a 4K timeline, image stabilization works differently than if I’m editing 4K inside, say, an HD timeline. There is our R3D native file inside the source monitor. I need to configure this to match the sequence settings. We’ll drag it in, we’ll say change the sequence settings and there is our R3D file playing natively inside Premiere.

Larry Jordan: Except notice the road. The road is rocking. Generally, the road doesn’t rock when you are shooting unless the camera is handheld, so we need to stabilize it. We’ll go to the effects menu, do a search for the warp stabilizer, grab that and drag it onto the clip and, like all image stabilization, the first thing that it’s got to do is analyze the clip, because what it’s doing is it’s mapping where essential pixels are moving so it knows what it has to stabilize and what it doesn’t.

Larry Jordan: Here we go. Analysis is not particularly fast when you’re dealing with an image as large as 4K, but the analysis is done and now, if we rewind back to the beginning, notice how steady the road is because the default settings in warp stabilizer have just taken out all that handheld jitter. This is a really, really important point. The larger or the higher the resolution of your video, the more critical it is that it be stable.

Larry Jordan: When we’re looking at tiny little images in standard def, you can have the camera move as much as you want, nobody’s going to get sick watching it. But when you take higher resolution video and you display it on a larger screen or a theatrical size screen, sensitive members of the audience are absolutely going to develop motion sickness. This is why, as your resolution increases, the speed of your movements must decrease – slower pans, slower tilts – and image stabilization becomes really important because the eye gets fooled into thinking the whole environment around you is moving and suddenly your audience is throwing up in the aisles when you really want them to be fascinated by the quality of your cinematography.

Larry Jordan: There’s a conflict here so, one, move slower when you shoot 4K and, two, image stabilize. It doesn’t have to be rock solid, you can keep that handheld kind of movement, but take the jerkiness out of it or your audience is just never going to be able to concentrate on your material because it’s just too disquieting for their tummies.

Larry Jordan: But a couple of interesting things. In order for warp stabilizer to work, the clip must be in a sequence and both the sequence frame size and the clip frame size must match, which means it’s fine for stabilizing a 4K image in a 4K project, but what do you do when you want to stabilize an image in an HD project? Here, warp stabilizer breaks unless you know the secret. Let me show you.

Larry Jordan: If I apply the warp stabilizer, I’m going to get an error message and it says it requires the clip dimensions to be the same as the sequence. Well, this won’t work. What we do instead – let’s go back up to the effect controls and take off the effect – is we right mouse click on this and we nest the sequence. The word nest is right there and we’ll just accept the default name and apply the warp stabilizer to the nest. Again, it’s got to go through and calculate, which is going to take the better part of three minutes, so I’m going to do a quick dissolve here because it still has to analyze. But the way that we get around the fact that the warp stabilizer requires the clip to be the same size as the project is that we nest the clip.

Larry Jordan: At that point, the warp stabilizer works exactly the same way and, as soon as this analysis is done, I want to show you a couple of settings that can even improve the quality of the stabilization once the filter’s done analyzing. Be right back.

Larry Jordan: And the analysis is almost complete. If we go down to the effect controls, we can see that this is where it’s listing the analysis. It’s good to go, we’ll just hit it at the beginning and play it. Notice that the image is stable but we see some variation at the top and the bottom. That’s because down here for borders I’ve left the smooth motion set, subspace warp set, but I’ve changed the borders. Stabilize only means that the image is stable but we’re going to see little edges of black creeping in and out.

Larry Jordan: If I say stabilize and crop, it’s going to crop evenly around the image and make the image look stable, but the best option is crop and auto scale and it’s going to slightly zoom our image so that it fills the entire frame and now you don’t notice the motion jitter of the road. What we’re seeing is that warp stabilizer works great when you’re editing a 4K clip in a 4K sequence, but if you’re using warp stabilizer on a 4K clip inside an HD sequence, you always want to nest the 4K clip in order for the image stabilization to work.

Larry Jordan: Charles Dautremont is the CEO and CTO of Cinedeck. As the Chief Technology Officer, he leads a team of developers creating innovative solutions for the broadcast industry. Charles holds a Bachelor of Science in architecture from Cornell University and started in the entertainment industry here in Los Angeles as a Technical Director at the visual effects and animation studio Rhythm & Hues. Hello, Charles, welcome.

Charles Dautremont: How are you doing?

Larry Jordan: We’re talking to you and I’m looking forward to this interview, so we’re doing great. How about yourself?

Charles Dautremont: Good, good. Good to be back. It’s been a long time.

Larry Jordan: It has indeed. How would you describe Cinedeck?

Charles Dautremont: Oh, a lot of work. We make tools that help people get their work done. That’s how I’d describe it.

Larry Jordan: Well, yes, but that could be said of just about any software developer and you guys don’t do software as much as hardware.

Mike Horton: I’ll tell you, I saw it just a couple of weeks ago at the LAFCPUG meeting in the lobby and I would describe it as magic. Using that word, you can go in and say, “Well, what makes it magic, Horton?” Well, don’t talk to me, talk to Charles.

Larry Jordan: Ok, so why is it magical?

Charles Dautremont: Well, lately it’s magical because we’ve cracked the insert editing egg into flattened files, which has been a problem for everybody since the advent of file based workflows. Once you’ve got a flat file, if you have to make a change in the past you had to re-render the entire file after making the change in the NLE. That’s no longer true.

Larry Jordan: Define a flat file. Tell me what a flat file means to you.

Charles Dautremont: A file that you would deliver to the network, for instance, so you have your timeline in your editor, like Avid or Final Cut, and when that’s all cut and you’ve added all your effects and color and all the rest of it, the end of the game is you render it out as one layer with the audio however it needs to be and that’s what you hand off to your delivery. Now, if you need to make a change to that, say there’s an audio dropout or misspelling in a lower third, that sort of thing, in the traditional workflow you go back to your editor and you give that person whatever the fix is, they put it in the timeline and they re-render the final product again.

Larry Jordan: Well, that’s because so many compression algorithms compress between frames, it’s not just individual frames that are compressed, they compress video in groups of frames which means insert editing becomes difficult because of the way the compression scheme works. Do you guys get around that somehow?

Charles Dautremont: We do it for certain codecs like XDCAM that are… like that, but most delivery codecs actually are iFrame codecs, but still to this day no-one has really done that. But we’ve done it.

Larry Jordan: Back in the day, which is long before you were born, I was doing video editing on one inch and two inch tape decks and we could do insert edits in tape, but the insert would need to be exactly the same duration as the clip that we were replacing, it just dropped in and had to match to the frame. Do you have the same limitation as we do with insert edits on the Cinedeck?

Charles Dautremont: Do you mean if you have a 40 minute tape, you need to work within that 40 minute tape’s duration?

Larry Jordan: No, let’s say you wanted to replace a one minute shot and you needed to replace it with a one minute and five second shot, can you still do that as an insert edit or do we have to go back to the NLE?

Charles Dautremont: You would need to go back to the NLE in that case. It’s really extremely analogous to working with tape. If you have a file that’s 40 minutes long, it’s like having a 40 minute tape. If you need a 42 minute file, then you would have to go get a 60 minute tape to fit it in. So again, it’s very much like tape in that sense.

Larry Jordan: So is insert edit a product, an application, a feature within one of your hardware boxes or a plug-in for an NLE?

Charles Dautremont: Currently it’s a feature in the software that runs on our hardware. That doesn’t mean that it won’t become those other things at some point in the not too distant future.

Larry Jordan: So help me understand, how does the process work? I’ve got a one hour show, I’ve got to replace a bad title, I misspelled a person’s name, so how do I do it?

Charles Dautremont: You load the complete file that you exported earlier into our insert edit player and with your NLE you treat it exactly like a tape machine, set an in point, an out point. In Avid, for instance, you use the digital cut tool, press the ‘Digital cut go’ and it does the insert, so it’s very simple and very much like using a tape machine.

Larry Jordan: So we would transfer the file to one of the three different versions of Cinedeck that are out there, do the edit down the Cinedeck and then transfer it back off to the final distribution? Am I hearing that correctly?

Charles Dautremont: The file can live anywhere, as long as you have a big enough pipe. For instance, most of our customers have SANs that their files live on, like an ISCI or similar, and as long as the pipe is big enough, the file can be run directly from the SAN inserted to and it still lives on the SAN so there’s not really a copy overhead or that sort of thing.

Larry Jordan: Ok, then I’m confused again because I thought you said earlier that it required Cinedeck gear to be able to do the insert edit and now we’re doing it from the SAN. Where does the Cinedeck get involved?

Charles Dautremont: The Cinedeck gets involved because there’s baseband video involved. The NLE is playing out video to the Cinedeck, which is then writing it into the file. It’s exactly like a tape machine, if you think of it that way. The tape just can live somewhere else, like on a SAN.

Larry Jordan: Is the insert edit frame accurate?

Charles Dautremont: It is, of course, perfectly frame accurate or it wouldn’t be much use, and it’s also better than a tape machine in some respects because on a tape machine it’s very hard to do an extremely short insert. At least, the engineers I’ve spoken to, people don’t do less than a second usually, whereas we could do a single frame of a single channel of audio.

Larry Jordan: And what codecs does this support?

Charles Dautremont: Currently in use around town, most people work in ProRes, some people work a bit in DNx. I’d say 95 percent of the work is done in ProRes.

Mike Horton: Really? 95 percent? Jeez.

Charles Dautremont: Absolutely. Network deliveries that are not cinema deliveries, in other words network television, are I would say maybe higher than 95 percent ProRes.

Mike Horton: Wow.

Charles Dautremont: Yes, and there are people who prefer DNx but they’re a small minority mostly because of what the networks require, not the actual preferences of the people doing the work. Now, we also support JPEG 2000 for insert edit and for cinematic deliveries, of course, that’s more common.

Larry Jordan: We’ve talked about the codecs that you support, and this doesn’t even require an NLE, so this could be something that could be done long after the editors involved with the project are finished. You realize that there’s a mistake here or we’ve got to blur something out or whatever, so this doesn’t actually require tying in with the edit suite, it just requires access to the master output of the show, correct?

Charles Dautremont: Right. For instance, a scenario that comes up relatively frequently with one of our customers is their customer will arrive with a fix for a show that was done, well, put out to tape and they need to make the inserts from the tape to the file, so we also support that and drive the tape machine as the source for the fix.

Larry Jordan: Given what this does, aside from the fact that it requires Cinedeck gear to run, are there other limitations with this that we should be aware of?

Charles Dautremont: There are some limitations in terms of codec, things like variable bitrate H.264. That’s very difficult to do and not a big need for that, but that’s certainly a limitation. Lossless compression where the frame sizes are not the same, it’s a similar scenario. Otherwise there aren’t a whole lot of limitations. You’re limited in the number of audio channels by the FDI, you can only carry 16. So a file based version of this, which allows you to just open two files and do an insert from one to the other, would have fewer of these limitations that are hardware based.

Larry Jordan: You know, it’s an amazing technique, to be able to do an insert edit on a file based workflow and have it be frame accurate. I’m sitting here stunned that you can actually do this.

Mike Horton: You’ve just got to see it.

Larry Jordan: It’s just amazing.

Charles Dautremont: Yes, yes. Everybody says they can’t believe it, they have to see it, and then when they see it, it’s a little bit underwhelming because it just works. If you come from the tape world, it’s even more underwhelming because that’s how you have worked all your life.

Larry Jordan: That’s right, they always did it that way.

Charles Dautremont: But this all started back in the early 2000s, when we were doing film deliveries in short films and we were working in After Effects and some of the stuff we were doing was 4K or 6K at the time and it took eight, ten or 12 hours to export something. So if you made a mistake or you had a fix or the client wanted something else, that’s a serious penalty. It seemed to me at the time, I couldn’t believe it, here we are in this digital world, it’s just data, why can’t we just fix it in the flat file? I don’t know.

Larry Jordan: And now for the first time, we can. Charles, where can we go on the web to learn more about this product and the rest of the Cinedeck gear?

Charles Dautremont: You can go to cinedeck.com. That’s full of nice little demo stuff and all kinds of information.

Larry Jordan: And Charles Dautremont is the CEO and CTO of Cinedeck. Charles, thanks for joining us today. This has been a fun interview. I’m glad for your time.

Larry Jordan: It’s time for a Buzz Flashback. Five years ago today…

Andy Howard (archive): One of the things that we’ve been focusing on recently is integration in with unified communications environments. In particular, we’re showing integration with Microsoft Sharepoint server for information distribution throughout organizations, as well as Microsoft’s Office communication server so that you can view video directly within the Office communicator client and be able to collaborate with users about that video as you’re watching it.

Larry Jordan: This was a Buzz Flashback.

Larry Jordan: Michael, I was just thinking, you’ve had a past history with Christina. She’s been working with you now for a long time.

Mike Horton: I did. We need to have her back because she’s got a story. She’s got a great story of survival in this industry.

Larry Jordan: And not giving up.

Mike Horton: And not giving up and ambition and all the things that we need to survive and it goes beyond what most of us have gone through. Whether she wants to talk about it or not, I don’t know, but she’s a hell of a woman. Very talented.

Larry Jordan: And how did you get her to do your website? That’s a story in itself.

Mike Horton: It was interesting, because when you start a user group, all of a sudden everybody’s excited about it and it’s a digital revolution and all that kind of stuff, everybody wants to help, and she was one of those people who wanted to help and she happened to be a graphics designer and I, as you know, cannot draw a stick figure…

Larry Jordan: I do know that.

Mike Horton: …and I find web design incredibly boring, so she did the design of the website but it had to be simple enough for me to update it all the time, and it’s stayed the same for 15 years. It’s just terrible.

Larry Jordan: Well, my feeling is once you find something that works, don’t change it.

Mike Horton: I know. It looks so old, but it’s easy to navigate. Thank you, Chris. It works.

Larry Jordan: I want to thank our guests for tonight, starting with film editor Patrick Southern, then sound designer Christina Horgan and Charles Dautremont, the CEO and CTO of Cinedeck.

Larry Jordan: There’s a lot of history in our industry, as Mike has just made clear, and you’ll find it at digitalproductionbuzz.com, thousands of interviews all online and all available today; and please sign up for our free weekly show newsletter, talk with us on Twitter, @DPBuZZ, and Facebook at digitalproductionbuzz.com.

Larry Jordan: Our theme music is composed by Nathan Dugie Turner with additional music provided by smartsound.com. Text transcripts are provided by Take 1 Transcription – visit take1.tv to learn how they can help you.

Larry Jordan: Our producer is Cirina Catania; production is Megan Paulos, Ed Golya, Keegan Guy, Lindsay Luebbert, James Miller and Brianna Murphy. On behalf of the handsome Mike Horton, my name’s Larry Jordan and thanks for listening to The Buzz.

Mike Horton: Goodbye, everybody.

Announcer #1: The Digital Production Buzz was brought to you by Other World Computing, providing quality hardware solutions and extensive technical support to the worldwide computer industry since 1988; and by Blackmagic Design, creating revolutionary solutions for film, post production and television.

Digital Production Buzz – December 3, 2015

Join Larry Jordan and Mike Horton as they talk with Patrick Southern, Christina Horgan, and Charles Dautremont.

  • Getting Started as an Assistant Editor
  • Secrets of Sound Design
  • Solve Problems with Cinedeck’s “Insert Edit”
  • Randi’s Perspective: The Latest From Adobe and Assimilate
  • Tech Talk: Image Stabilization in Premiere Pro CC with 4K Media

View Show Transcript

Watch the Full Episode

Tech Talk
With Larry Jordan
 

Buzz on YouTubeTranscript

Listen to the Full Episode


Buzz on iTunesTranscript

Guests this Week

Patrick Southern
Patrick Southern, Assistant Editor
Editor & Assistant Editor, Patrick Southern specializes in FCP X but also works on Avid and Premiere Pro. Patrick has spent the last year cutting documentaries in Los Angeles for A&E, National Geographic, and the Lifetime Movie Network. Tonight, he shares his techniques on how to become a successful assistant editor.
Christina Horgan
Christina Horgan, Post Sound Editor, Fire Lotus Productions & Dog House Post Audio
Christina Horgan began her career as a Graphic Designer then transitioned into Sound Editing. Since then, she’s worked on feature films, television and the web. She recently won the award for Best Sound Design at the 2015 FANtastic Horror Film Festival for her work on the Psychological Thriller/Horror Feature CUT!. Christina is a member of the Motion Picture Sound Editors Guild and shares her thoughts on creating great sound design during production on a budget.
Charles Dautremont
Charles Dautremont, CEO/CTO, Cinedeck
How many times have you created the “final output” only to discover that a small section of your project needs to be replaced? In the past, we needed to re-output the entire project. Now, Cinedeck has the perfect solution with their new feature, Insert Edit. CEO/CTO Charles Dautremont explains how it works.